Trump's Lawyer Admits to Paying the Whore

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

This is great. Cheeto's lawyer has no publicly admitted to paying the porn star. The lawyer - lying of course - claims that he paid for it out of his own pocket in an excuse to keep cheeto out of it and to not violate any campaign finance laws.

In making the comment, the porn star believes the non-disclosure agreement has been violated, so now she is going to tell the story (and of course get paid well for it).

Is it that cheeto is the world's biggest moron or does he just surround himself with morons?

 

[countryroads89]

This is great. Cheeto's lawyer has no publicly admitted to paying the porn star. The lawyer - lying of course - claims that he paid for it out of his own pocket in an excuse to keep cheeto out of it and to not violate any campaign finance laws.

In making the comment, the porn star believes the non-disclosure agreement has been violated, so now she is going to tell the story (and of course get paid well for it).

Is it that cheeto is the world's biggest moron or does he just surround himself with morons?

Both.

 

[Herd Fever]

This is great. Cheeto's lawyer has no publicly admitted to paying the porn star. The lawyer - lying of course - claims that he paid for it out of his own pocket in an excuse to keep cheeto out of it and to not violate any campaign finance laws.

In making the comment, the porn star believes the non-disclosure agreement has been violated, so now she is going to tell the story (and of course get paid well for it).

Is it that cheeto is the world's biggest moron or does he just surround himself with morons?

You answered your own questions

 

[i am herdman]

This is great. Cheeto's lawyer has no publicly admitted to paying the porn star. The lawyer - lying of course - claims that he paid for it out of his own pocket in an excuse to keep cheeto out of it and to not violate any campaign finance laws.

In making the comment, the porn star believes the non-disclosure agreement has been violated, so now she is going to tell the story (and of course get paid well for it).

Is it that cheeto is the world's biggest moron or does he just surround himself with morons?

I assume "no" was a typo.

hahaha, You ass. Had to do it. Seriously, why are you against Trump banging a porn star ho bag?

 

[extragreen]

Now the cons have assimilated paying porn stars for sex into their family values claim.

 

[dherd]

This is great. Cheeto's lawyer has no publicly admitted to paying the porn star. The lawyer - lying of course - claims that he paid for it out of his own pocket in an excuse to keep cheeto out of it and to not violate any campaign finance laws.

In making the comment, the porn star believes the non-disclosure agreement has been violated, so now she is going to tell the story (and of course get paid well for it).

Is it that cheeto is the world's biggest moron or does he just surround himself with morons?

YES, THAT WOULD BE ILLEGAL, AND WE ALL KNOW WHAT AN UPSTANDING GENTLEMAN
TRUMP AND ALL HIS ASSOCIATES ARE. DIDNT WANT TO TAKE ANY CHANCES TRUMP
WAS AFRAID THAT SELLING OUT TO RUSSIA WOULDNT BE ENOUGH.

 

[HerdBuckeye]

I assume "no" was a typo.

hahaha, You ass. Had to do it. Seriously, why are you against Trump banging a porn star ho bag?

Wasn’t he married?? I think my question answers your question.

 

[ThunderCat98]

"Whore."

Ladies and gentlemen, the party that champions women's rights (but only when they want their votes).

 

[i am herdman]

Wasn’t he married?? I think my question answers your question.

Did I ask you?

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

"Whore."

Ladies and gentlemen, the party that champions women's rights (but only when they want their votes).

Well, technically she is a whore, as she engages in sexual acts for money.

 

[sistersville]

Now the cons have assimilated paying porn stars for sex into their family values claim.

. All cons or a few cons or 2 cons. Dont wrap them all into one lump eg

 

[extragreen]

. All cons or a few cons or 2 cons. Dont wrap them all into one lump eg

About 50 million of them

 

[19MU88]

Boys, as long as he keeps on MAGA....it's all good.

keep trying, wishing and hoping but the fact remains....HE IS YOUR PRESIDENT.

 

[HFF-SLTX]

Boys, as long as he keeps on MAGA....it's all good.

keep trying, wishing and hoping but the fact remains....HE IS YOUR PRESIDENT.

Actually, he is OUR President. And after the 1990's, I don't think much of America cares what type of sex life a President has. After all, we learned that having an extra marital affair with a White House intern while on the job did not matter, as long as the POTUS did his job of putting the American people first. I am just waiting for Melania to appear on the Today Show and proclaim this Vast Left Wing conspiracy.

 

[HerdBuckeye]

Actually, he is OUR President. And after the 1990's, I don't think much of America cares what type of sex life a President has. After all, we learned that having an extra marital affair with a White House intern while on the job did not matter, as long as the POTUS did his job of putting the American people first. I am just waiting for Melania to appear on the Today Show and proclaim this Vast Left Wing conspiracy.

The conspiracy being that she is really a mail order bride sent by the Russians to infiltrate Trumps family. Bahahaha.

 

[C.K. Ocsevol-Evad]

"Whore."

Ladies and gentlemen, the party that champions women's rights (but only when they want their votes).

Clearly, you and Raleigh don’t know the definition of a “whore,” moron.

 

[WV-FAN]

The conspiracy being that she is really a mail order bride sent by the Russians to infiltrate Trumps family. Bahahaha.

it's a wonder the left hasn't figured a way to scheme this yet. no surprise a leftie would come up with the idea.

 

[ARandomHerdFan]

"Whore."

Ladies and gentlemen, the party that champions women's rights (but only when they want their votes).

 

[HerdBuckeye]

it's a wonder the left hasn't figured a way to scheme this yet. no surprise a leftie would come up with the idea.

I’m sure she married him for his devilish good looks. Such a handsome devil.

 

[ThunderCat98]

Clearly, you and Raleigh don’t know the definition of a “whore,” moron.

Yeah. That's it. I don't know what "whore" means.

Whether or not she accepts money for sex, I'm sure we can all agree that the term "whore" is degrading and derisive. Hey! Here's an idea! Since she's your "friend," maybe you should tell her you think she's a "whore" and see how well that goes over.

Seems to me you referring to a woman who uses sex for profit by a derogatory term doesn't really fit with all that virtue signalling you like to engage in.

Oh, and let's not act like you don't refer to all women as "sluts" and "whores." You've done it hundreds of times on this very board.

 

[countryroads89]

Yeah. That's it. I don't know what "whore" means.

Whether or not she accepts money for sex, I'm sure we can all agree that the term "whore" is degrading and derisive. Hey! Here's an idea! Since she's your "friend," maybe you should tell her you think she's a "whore" and see how well that goes over.

Seems to me you referring to a woman who uses sex for profit by a derogatory term doesn't really fit with all that virtue signalling you like to engage in.

Oh, and let's not act like you don't refer to all women as "sluts" and "whores." You've done it hundreds of times on this very board.

LOL!

You're defending a prostitute? Is that a better word. You're outraged because someone called her a whore?

LOL!

Let's npot lose sight of the big picture here. Little hands donnie slept with a whore just a few months after his wife gave birth to their son and had his personal attorney pay her hush money. That does wonders for the dignity of the White House, the highest office in the country.

Go back to denigrating the black who was faithfully married for many years and counting and raised two upstanding young ladies in the name of "family values." And while you're at it, maybe you can call Michelle an "ape in heels."

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

Whether or not she accepts money for sex, I'm sure we can all agree that the term "whore" is degrading and derisive. .

That depends on how you view language, and how you view the actual acts that earn one that term.

That word is common in Shakespeare, and in The Bible. Using a "nicer" word, such as prostitute, doesn't change the moral self-degradation that is whoring oneself. If anything, I would say you are indulging in the very liberal pastime of not calling a spade a spade.

 

[ThunderCat98]

LOL!

You're defending a prostitute? Is that a better word. You're outraged because someone called her a whore?

LOL!

Let's npot lose sight of the big picture here. Little hands donnie slept with a whore just a few months after his wife gave birth to their son and had his personal attorney pay her hush money. That does wonders for the dignity of the White House, the highest office in the country.

Go back to denigrating the black who was faithfully married for many years and counting and raised two upstanding young ladies in the name of "family values." And while you're at it, maybe you can call Michelle an "ape in heels."

First, I'm not "defending" anyone. Merely pointing out the hypocrisy of the left. Where or how you came up with my "defense" of this lady, Trump, or their actions, I'm not sure.

Second, I doubt you had the same faux outrage when Slick Willy was having sexual relations with an intern in the Oval Office.

Third, wtf??? When or where have I ever made racial slurs towards the Obamas or anyone else?

You are a f*cking idiot.

 

[C.K. Ocsevol-Evad]

Yeah. That's it. I don't know what "whore" means.

Whether or not she accepts money for sex, I'm sure we can all agree that the term "whore" is degrading and derisive. Hey! Here's an idea! Since she's your "friend," maybe you should tell her you think she's a "whore" and see how well that goes over.

Seems to me you referring to a woman who uses sex for profit by a derogatory term doesn't really fit with all that virtue signalling you like to engage in.

Oh, and let's not act like you don't refer to all women as "sluts" and "whores." You've done it hundreds of times on this very board.

You truly are a fvcking moron. A whore is defined as somebody who accepts money for sex. I don’t look highly upon anyone - male or female - who accepts money for sex. Therefore, it’s not denigrating women. It’s denigrating an action regardless of gender.

Denigrating an action is in no way contradictory to supporting equal rights for women. In fact, it’s the opposite. It’s holding women, just like men, accountable for their actions.

If a woman blows up a school with hundreds of children in it, is it contrary to supporting equal rights for women by calling her a “cvnt”? Of course not. See how illogical your attempt is?

And my friend? I’ve never even heard of this women before the cheeto debacle. Like usual, you have no idea what you’re talking about and only continuing to prove the widely held belief that you’re a moron.

 

[big_country90]

Clearly, you and Raleigh don’t know the definition of a “whore,” moron.

Ok...we'll just wait until you call a random girl a slvt, like you have done a thousand times before on here, to call you out.

 

[ThunderCat98]

You truly are a fvcking moron. A whore is defined as somebody who accepts money for sex. I don’t look highly upon anyone - male or female - who accepts money for sex. Therefore, it’s not denigrating women. It’s denigrating an action regardless of gender.

Denigrating an action is in no way contradictory to supporting equal rights for women. In fact, it’s the opposite. It’s holding women, just like men, accountable for their actions.

If a woman blows up a school with hundreds of children in it, is it contrary to supporting equal rights for women by calling her a “cvnt”? Of course not. See how illogical your attempt is?

And my friend? I’ve never even heard of this women before the cheeto debacle. Like usual, you have no idea what you’re talking about and only continuing to prove the widely held belief that you’re a moron.

First, your analogy is ridiculous. What happened to you? You used to be better at this. Old age catching up to you?

Second, you haven't addressed the fact that you often refer to women as "sluts" and "whores," not just this one.

Third, I thought you posted something previously about knowing this woman (maybe another woman he had an affair with?). Maybe it was another poster.

 

[Brushy Bill]

Now the cons have assimilated paying porn stars for sex into their family values claim.

And somehow you're on team abortion, odd.

 

[extragreen]

And somehow you're on team abortion, odd.

And somehow, team abortion doesn't claim to be the family values party.

 

[Brushy Bill]

I thought she got paid to keep her mouth shut, not for sex. So technically she's not a whore, right.

 

[C.K. Ocsevol-Evad]

First, your analogy is ridiculous. What happened to you? You used to be better at this. Old age catching up to you?

.

The analogy is fine. Your intelligence isn’t. The analogy proved that attacking a person due to an action which just happens to be reprehensible doesn’t contradict a stance on women’s rights.

Second, you haven't addressed the fact that you often refer to women as "sluts" and "whores," not just this one.


.

Yes, I often refer to slvtty women as “slvts.” If a guy robs a bank, I refer to him as a bank robber. Your attempt is as bad as all of your others.

Identifying an action and labeling a person based on said action doesn’t contradict support for female rights. What is so hard for you to understand about that?

.

Third, I thought you posted something previously about knowing this woman (maybe another woman he had an affair with?). Maybe it was another poster.

As E.T. says, that is your problem. Don’t try thinking.

I thought she got paid to keep her mouth shut, not for sex. So technically she's not a whore, right.

She is a porn star. She gets paid to have sex. So, no, you’re wrong, and pretty fvcking stupid at that.

 

[countryroads89]

I thought she got paid to keep her mouth shut, not for sex. So technically she's not a whore, right.

Damn dude, you’re on your own level of stupid.

 

[ThunderCat98]

You know you've gotten under CK's/Rifle's skin when his responses consist entirely of slamming your intelligence and name - calling. Way to resort to ad hominem attacks. I'm sure your fans here (all 3-4 of them) think they're way cool.

 

[herdfan06]

Can we get back to discussing whores, rather than the proper grammatical application of the word?

 

[Brushy Bill]

And somehow, team abortion doesn't claim to be the family values party.

That's a good thing, because team abortion hates families. Nice jersies your team wears, is the red dye made from aborted baby blood?

 

[C.K. Ocsevol-Evad]

You know you've gotten under CK's/Rifle's skin when his responses consist entirely of slamming your intelligence and name - calling. Way to resort to ad hominem attacks. I'm sure your fans here (all 3-4 of them) think they're way cool.

Yeah, clearly your stupidity is under my skin, because I never call people “morons,” “idiots,” or mock their intelligence after they say something foolish.

Nice job failing on your “hypocrite” attempt. Here, this is an example of hypocrisy; your post from earlier on the thread . . . ‘89 must have really gotten under you skin!

You are a f*cking idiot.

 

[extragreen]

That's a good thing, because team abortion hates families. Nice jersies your team wears, is the red dye made from aborted baby blood?

It's not smart for cons to attempt to play nicey nice with abortion with me. I'll start voting a straight republican ticket when cons provide and pass legislation to both stop abortion and also pay for the food, clothing, shelter, and health insurance up to the age of 18 years of all prevented abortions. Ball is in your court, babies or your money? That's what I thought.

 

[Brushy Bill]

It's not smart for cons to attempt to play nicey nice with abortion with me. I'll start voting a straight republican ticket when cons provide and pass legislation to both stop abortion and also pay for the food, clothing, shelter, and health insurance up to the age of 18 years of all prevented abortions. Ball is in your court, babies or your money? That's what I thought.

This is why it's pointless to discuss things with Marxists like you, you literally gave me zero opportunity to respond.

 

[extragreen]

This is why it's pointless to discuss things with Marxists like you, you literally gave me zero opportunity to respond.

It's pointless for you to bring up the subject with me. I already know that cons would ban abortion if they could, but you aren't willing to pay to help them after they're born. You're not pro life, your pro birth. Then it's the pull yourself up by boot straps from there on out.

 

[ThunderCat98]

Yeah, clearly your stupidity is under my skin, because I never call people “morons,” “idiots,” or mock their intelligence after they say something foolish.

Nice job failing on your “hypocrite” attempt. Here, this is an example of hypocrisy; your post from earlier on the thread . . . ‘89 must have really gotten under you skin!

He did. Which is why I called him a f*cking idiot. See, like most normal people, I don't have a problem admitting when someone irritates me.

Now people that suffers from NPD? They would never admit someone is annoying them. Too close to saying that person is an equal, snd we all know a narcissist simply couldn't stomach that. Reminds me of someone that posts here . . .

 

[Brushy Bill]

It's pointless for you to bring up the subject with me. I already know that cons would ban abortion if they could, but you aren't willing to pay to help them after they're born. You're not pro life, your pro birth. Then it's the pull yourself up by boot straps from there on out.

I keep telling you I'm not a con/cuck/GOPe, yet you are literally to retarded to understand that fact.

Proverbs 6:16-17

16 These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:

17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,


Now, the question is, in a free society like ours where "we the people" have the power to choose our representation, are those that vote for abortion loving democrats complicit in the murder of MILLIONS of babies in Gods eyes? You better hope not.