Van Plows Into Muslims Leaving Evening Prayer in London

[wvkeeper(HN)]

 

[herdfan06]

Story

 

[Walter Brennaneer]

http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/18/entertainment/beyonce-babies/index.html

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

I still can't find anything labeling this as "terrorism." Is that only when the victims are white and not Muslim?

 

[herdfan429]

I still can't find anything labeling this as "terrorism." Is that only when the victims are white and not Muslim?

It absolutely is terrorism and should be labeled as such.

 

[i am herdman]

I still can't find anything labeling this as "terrorism." Is that only when the victims are white and not Muslim?

Here you go,

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/0...police-investigate-incident-as-terrorism.html

 

[19MU88]

That's a relief. I was afraid the media would just report man loses control of van.

Let's go ahead and call him radical as well

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

I still can't find anything labeling this as "terrorism." Is that only when the victims are white and not Muslim?

If he had no political goal beyond not liking Muslims, it is not terrorism. It's then just a good ol' hate crime. Of course, the British government will call it terrorism just be politically correct.

 

[wisemaniac]

I still can't find anything labeling this as "terrorism." Is that only when the victims are white and not Muslim?

The Charleston shooting victims weren't white.

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

The Charleston shooting victims weren't white.

Yes, I love anecdotal fallacies.

As you can see from a Facebook video going around, the media (and people) are quick to paint an act committed by a person with darker skin and/or a Middle Eastern sounding name as an act of terrorism. Yet, with an act against Muslims committed by a cracker, the use of "terrorism" as a description is rare and takes time to earn.

In this case, some publications even blamed those in the mosque in their headlines before later changing the headlines.

 

[i am herdman]

Told you a

Yes, I love anecdotal fallacies.

As you can see from a Facebook video going around, the media (and people) are quick to paint an act committed by a person with darker skin and/or a Middle Eastern sounding name as an act of terrorism. Yet, with an act against Muslims committed by a cracker, the use of "terrorism" as a description is rare and takes time to earn.

In this case, some publications even blamed those in the mosque in their headlines before later changing the headlines.

That and just like the HUD thread where you went for shock value.

Backfired

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

Told you a
That and just like the HUD thread where you went for shock value.

Backfired

English, please.

 

[sistersville]

It can all be called a hate crime but its terrorism. Listen libs your hero bill mahler said " after a terrorist attack by a crazy islamic terrorist, please dont let THOSE POOR MUSLIMS leave your lips.IF BLACKS in america WERE MUSLIM they would have taken over america by now.

 

[wisemaniac]

Yes, I love anecdotal fallacies.

As you can see from a Facebook video going around, the media (and people) are quick to paint an act committed by a person with darker skin and/or a Middle Eastern sounding name as an act of terrorism. Yet, with an act against Muslims committed by a cracker, the use of "terrorism" as a description is rare and takes time to earn.

In this case, some publications even blamed those in the mosque in their headlines before later changing the headlines.

This should be called terrorism. And the Charleston reference is not an anecdotal fallacy.