It was pathetic watching Army do everything possible to lose that game
For sure. The Go Navy post is the most positive thing to come from you on here. You might even be a fan of Navy.I enjoyed it
For sure. The Go Navy post is the most positive thing to come from you on here. You might even be a fan of Navy.
Very well said and well put.The biggest playbook Army needs to learn is to change your athletic department over to a 501C non profit like Navy. That way you can raise more private money and hire better coaches(like Paul Johsnon and the current Nay Coach) and you can do $70 million stadium renovations and so on. You can get around the federal public institution handcuff and red tape. Let's you join a high mid major conference. That attracts better players, coaches, etc. Also, Army, like Navy, needs to consider relaxing standards such as the military obligation after they are done at the school. That attracts better players who know if they get a pro contract they have some way around it. Oh, and Army needs to relax the 5 year commitment. Not much Army can do about telling mom's, dad's, and recruits that as a West Pointer you are likely to be in the infantry, armor, cavalry, and field artillery. No likely to be a biochemist or get a plush desk job in Sand Diego for a few years. Not going to get to be a David Robinson or Napolean MCallum. It takes a special smart person that is driven to understand that being appointed an infantry platoon leader is a high honor. That's just the job they sign up to do and Army likes West Pointers in those roles. You are going to be a dirty muddy boot on the ground for awhile.
I think Army football is at a crossroads. They either need to align themselves with the Ivy League(or play at that level) and forget trying to compete at the high to mid level IA football or do what Navy did so they can compete. This isn't 1955 anymore. Recruiting and coaching is a whole different game now. Or, stay true to their mission which is to make military officers and not field a Top 20 football team. Either way works, but Army has a decision to make. It can't compete at that level doing what they have done for 100 years.
At ease, Sailor!
The biggest playbook Army needs to learn is to change your athletic department over to a 501C non profit like Navy. That way you can raise more private money and hire better coaches(like Paul Johsnon and the current Nay Coach) and you can do $70 million stadium renovations and so on. You can get around the federal public institution handcuff and red tape. Let's you join a high mid major conference. That attracts better players, coaches, etc. Also, Army, like Navy, needs to consider relaxing standards such as the military obligation after they are done at the school. That attracts better players who know if they get a pro contract they have some way around it. Oh, and Army needs to relax the 5 year commitment. Not much Army can do about telling mom's, dad's, and recruits that as a West Pointer you are likely to be in the infantry, armor, cavalry, and field artillery. No likely to be a biochemist or get a plush desk job in Sand Diego for a few years. Not going to get to be a David Robinson or Napolean MCallum. It takes a special smart person that is driven to understand that being appointed an infantry platoon leader is a high honor. That's just the job they sign up to do and Army likes West Pointers in those roles. You are going to be a dirty muddy boot on the ground for awhile.
I think Army football is at a crossroads. They either need to align themselves with the Ivy League(or play at that level) and forget trying to compete at the high to mid level IA football or do what Navy did so they can compete. This isn't 1955 anymore. Recruiting and coaching is a whole different game now. Or, stay true to their mission which is to make military officers and not field a Top 20 football team. Either way works, but Army has a decision to make. It can't compete at that level doing what they have done for 100 years.
In other words when ARMY decides they want to get better at something they need to pattern themselves after the NAVY and the USMC. Been telling you that herdman
Army can compete right now. Several of the games have been very close. Where do you get your information concerning Navy relaxing their service obligation? That is done by statute and rule and neither academy has much discretion in doing so. Last year you said Navy had relaxed its academic standards which was proven to be BS. Army is out of excuses......
Army can compete right now. Several of the games have been very close. Where do you get your information concerning Navy relaxing their service obligation? That is done by statute and rule and neither academy has much discretion in doing so. Last year you said Navy had relaxed its academic standards which was proven to be BS. Army is out of excuses......
Losing close games in not competing, winning games is competing. Army sucks ass when it comes to football and should seriously think about dropping down and joining the Patroit or IVY league
Losing close games in not competing, winning games is competing. Army sucks ass when it comes to football and should seriously think about dropping down and joining the Patroit or IVY league
saw on twitter a guy debating it, he basically said the main reason army can't compete with afa and navy is basically they're recruiting from the same pool of potential student athletes. you can go to afa or navy and spend your active duty obligation at a base far away from the front lines or you can go to army and likely be in the thick of things for your active duty obligation.
That is a reason, maybe a smaller reason than the other things mentioned. Most West Pointers are headed to a line platoon. But, the funding, conference affiliation etc. is a bigger reason.
Says the poster who obviously has never played a minute of competitive sports in his/her life. I couldn't disagree more with this opinion. Competing and being competitive are two different things friend.
This game is pointless. They should just do Navy/Air Force. At least it would be a good game most years. Army/Navy is pretty much predetermined.
Navy and Air Force do play each other. Actually it is a pretty close series.
Following your logic Marshall should not play wvu in basketball or football.
Series Navy leads, 60–49–7 (.547)
The Army vs Navy game is the best rivalry game in American sport.
Navy and Air Force do play each other. Actually it is a pretty close series.
Following your logic Marshall should not play wvu in basketball or football.
Series Navy leads, 60–49–7 (.547)
The Army vs Navy game is the best rivalry game in American sport.
Ha yea right
I agree and so did many of the commentators. Seeing this game in person should be on every fans bucket list. Concerning Army being competitive, I think the streak ends next year and Army may win the next three. I'll bet you a beer they win next year.
Auburn vs Alabama
Ohio State vs Michigan
Yankees vs Red Sox
Nah I don't have a lump because I could care less. Sorry I'm not some flag bearer turn a blind eye to the atrocities my government has committed American.
Army vs Navy is just another game to me
Great American institutions with pitiful football.
We have helped free more people and been more generous than any other nation in the world's history.
Well here for one. this country freed thousands of slaves who had been sold into slavery by their black brothers.Free who lol