Experts baffled. Scientists stumped. Fact-checkers bewildered.
What could it be?
- Thread starter murox
- Start date
I have asked you this numerous times, but you never answer: do you not know what "confirmation bias" is?
You're the biggest and easiest to identify example of that. Remember the horrendously illogical, easily disproved argument you made from that guy's tweet about electricity prices in Europe? This one is almost as bad. From your own damn article:
First, this:
“There is no credible evidence to suggest that Covid-19 vaccines have contributed to excess deaths in Australia or overseas,” the TGA said.
Ms Cutter also rubbished those claims.
“There is zero evidence that vaccines are causing these deaths as far as I’m concerned, but I cannot prove it,” she said.
Then, there is this:
Moreover, she noted the timing of the excess deaths “doesn’t match with the vaccine rollout, and the age profile of people dying does not match with people who’ve been vaccinated”.
“Hardly any young people are dying,” she said. She also noted there was no excess mortality in Western Australia in January and they were “just as vaccinated as the rest of the country”.
“The numbers do not stack up,” she added.
Remember Middle Class Murox's theory? Young, healthy people are going to be keeling over dead due to the vaccine. Well, these excess deaths are not impacting young people, so his own theory is shot down by his new theory. Brilliant.
I don’t. But your second failed attempt at trying to hint at my brother’s passing continues to prove that 1) you are the most morally-bankrupt, piece of shit human on this board 2) you continue to post about things you have no clue about 3) you try to find any glimmer of hope for your argument, even if it’s factually incorrect, while throwing out overwhelming evidence from the other side.
We know you don’t care about being morally bankrupt. That’s been shown time and time again starting way before you were banging and “developing strong feelings” for Hooters waitresses that you would put in your wife’s bed while she was working to pay the bills that you couldn’t. But do you not realize how stupid you look with your continued failed vaccine attempts, predictions that constantly never come to fruition, and the overwhelming and easy to see confirmation bias that you resort to?
Then why include “unexpectedly” in the obituary? There’s no moral failing on my part to warn people about the danger of this experimental poison.
Thanks, Banker. I appreciate it.
Let me teach what “context” means just like I’ve had to about “confirmation bias.”
In the context you’re attempting to use “unexpectedly,” it relates to something sudden without any warning that can be linked to getting vaccinated. In that context, it’s completely wrong.
With the use of it in the obituary, it relates to friends and family being aware that it was a very real possibility but one that wouldn’t come so quickly.
The fact that I have to dumb this down for you is still shocking even after your repeated inability to understand confirmation bias.
If that were your primary concern, you wouldn’t constantly use confirmation bias even when tbt overwhelming amount of evidence speaks against your position. You wouldn’t discard all evidence against your position and search for any sliver of hope that doesn’t disprove your claim, even if that sliver is based on illogical, false, or misinterpreted information.
We all know that isn’t your primary concern, and the fact that you can’t admit that nothing you have predicted has happened is further proof of that.
