Will Bill Clinton be the real president in 2017?

[Walden Pond]

How much of a hand will he have in Hillary's presidency? People are going to expect those good times again. The good times when Bill the man was running the show. Now you've got Hillary the woman. What if she wants to try to distinguish herself by doing things completely different than Bill, and she screws it all up?

Really, she can't win. Oh, she can win the election and the office. But she's going to be in the shadows of her husband. And watch him get all the attention. Once they're living in the White House again, they'll see him jogging around laughing everyday. They'll gravitate to him, wondering why he's so happy. Hillary has looked like a mad old hen for years. Nobody even likes her.

I wouldn't blame her if she withdrew from this whole thing. Her life story could be set to a sad Tammy Wynette song.

 

[i am herdman]

I am not so sure she can win now. I thought she was a slam dunk. But, she looks miserable and looks like an old hag. Plus, even women are calling her a liar beyond belief now. One woman even told me at least Bill was a likeable liar and he liked the country.

 

[MARSHALL77]

What a hoot for sure regarding the former President ...if she is elected ( which I seriously doubt will happen) we would then have a tie for the worst elections ever..that being the last two.

With all that is going on today , I am not so sure that as ignorant as many voters are that she has a serious chance to not only obtain the nomination but should she then win the election as the nominee. If the Dems go with her it is total political suicide.

All you have to do is bring up the DEATH of 4 AMERICANS in Bengahazi for starters and that with her floundering as well as inept and lying answers should end it...hopefully.


This post was edited on 4/13 6:27 PM by MARSHALL77

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

Originally posted by MARSHALL77:
All you have to do is bring up the DEATH of 4 AMERICANS in Bengahazi for starters and that with her floundering as well as inept and lying answers should end it...hopefully.

Isn't that interesting?

Neocons killed 3,527 Americans in Iraq, yet the GOP keeps running Neocons. Even Rand Paul is drifting toward neoconservatism.

Four Americans die in a CIA op gone wrong, and Faux News and its disciples go batshit. And hell, the good guys took out 100 bad guys there.

They had to lie. Forget national security and top-secret classified business, your average dumbass American can't handle the truth of what was going on there. They just picked the wrong lie. I guess at least we learned a goddamn ambassador shouldn't be involved ass-deep in gunrunning.

I'd vote for Bill again if we could. And I bet 60% of Americans would.

 

[wvkeeper(HN)]

Worth remembering that Bill Clinton never receive a majority of the vote in either 1992 or 1996.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

Originally posted by wvkeeper(HN):
Worth remembering that Bill Clinton never receive a majority of the vote in either 1992 or 1996.

It is worth noting. It is also worth noting Perot took votes from both conservatives and union liberals. I don't think we will see another third party candidate like that in a long time.

 

[MichiganHerd]

Originally posted by Raoul Duke MU:

They had to lie.

Administrations have been lying their balls off for decades, perhaps centuries. You're right, they do have to lie, or at least hold back from being forthcoming. I doubt many could handle the truth, if they knew what the hell was really going on.

The problem with Hussein's administration, is that they seem to have problems with getting their lies straight.