ADVERTISEMENT

A lawless President

The United States, the Court held that the federal government's power to regulate and enforce immigration was derived from its foreign policy power, which is located in Article I and Article II of the U.S. Constitution. Article 1 of the Constitution establishes the enumerated powers of Congress

Hey Bubba. It's not the right of Texas to ignore the U.S. Constitution. oath breakers might understand that but they are...well...oath breakers.
 
The State Self-Defense Clause in Article I, Section 10 provides that a State may defend itself when it has been “actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay,” and the State does not need the consent of Congress to do so. The Invasion Clause in Article IV, Section 4 provides that “[t]he United States … shall protect each [state in this union] against invasion.” These clauses provide dual protection against invasion broadly defined. This includes defending against actions by “foreign hostility [and] ambitious or vindictive enterprises of [a state’s] more powerful neighbors.” This encompasses defense against hostile non-state actors such as cartels and gangs operating at the border and entering into Arizona’s territory. James Madison specifically cited Virginia using its militia to stop smugglers as an example of a valid exercise of the invasion power, and there is every basis to conclude this sovereign power was retained as reflected in the State Self-Defense Clause. The Import-Export Clause in Article I, Section 10 also recognizes that States retain sovereign authority to execute inspection laws, which requires operational control of the border to channel entry of goods to authorized ports of entry. This is an aspect of the historical police power that is expressly preserved for the States. In sum, both the power of self-defense against being “actually invaded” and the power to “execut[e] [their] inspection laws” are sovereign powers that were retained by the States under the U.S. Constitution to permit States to control on-the-ground conditions at their borders that are essential to public safety and security in a State.
 
Hey Bubba,

The United States, the Court held that the federal government's power to regulate and enforce immigration was derived from its foreign policy power, which is located in Article I and Article II of the U.S. Constitution. Article 1 of the Constitution establishes the enumerated powers of Congress

Hey Bubba. It's not the right of Texas to ignore the U.S. Constitution. oath breakers might understand that but they are...well...oath breakers.
 
sovereign powers that were retained by the States under the U.S. Constitution to permit States to control on-the-ground conditions at their borders that are essential to public safety and security in a State.
 
Hey Bubba,

The United States, the Court held that the federal government's power to regulate and enforce immigration was derived from its foreign policy power, which is located in Article I and Article II of the U.S. Constitution. Article 1 of the Constitution establishes the enumerated powers of Congress

Hey Bubba. It's not the right of Texas to ignore the U.S. Constitution. oath breakers might understand that but they are...well...oath breakers.

Hey dumbass,

Damn, you're a dumbass and couldn't care less about America, its citizens and their rights, America-hating, dumbass.

Ex-FBI officials warn Congress of 'new and imminent' border danger: 'The country has been invaded'

A coalition of former FBI officials has issued a warning about a "new and imminent danger" for the U.S. at the southern border, suggesting the country has "been invaded" by military-age foreign nationals.

In a letter sent last week to congressional leaders in the House and Senate, the retired officials "express our concern about a current, specific threat that may be one of the most pernicious ever to menace the United States."

The letter warns "the United States is facing a new and imminent danger" and highlights what the officials say is a threat of an invasion at the southern border, where there were over 302,000 migrant encounters in December after a record fiscal 2023 in which there were 2.4 million migrant encounters.

"In its modern history, the U.S. has never suffered an invasion of the homeland and, yet, one is unfolding now," they say. "Military aged men from across the globe, many from countries or regions not friendly to the United States, are landing in waves on our soil by the thousands — not by splashing ashore from a ship or parachuting from a plane but rather by foot across a border that has been accurately advertised around the world as largely unprotected with ready access granted."

The ten officials include former FBI assistant directors Kevin Brock and Chris Swecker, former Terrorist Screening Center Director Timothy Healy and former acting Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Mark Morgan, who is also a former FBI superintendent.

They also note numbers of gotaways, which are estimated to have exceeded 800,000 last fiscal year, and encounters of those on the FBI’s terror watch list. FBI Director Christopher Wray has also expressed concern about who is evading Border Patrol.

The pedo administration has, however, also said it has greater awareness of the border now and that gotaways are a decades-old problem for the country.

"With the investments that this Congress has made in the Border Patrol, CBP as a whole, we have greater situational awareness now than I’ve ever had," Border Patrol Chief Raul Ortiz said in March last year.

The former officials express concern, particularly in light of the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel.

"It is stark to say so, but having a large number of young males now within our borders who could begin attacking gatherings of unarmed citizens, in imitation of 10/7 and at the behest of a foreign terror group, must be considered a distinct possibility," they wrote.

"We would be remiss not to call out this potentially grave threat in the most direct terms. The warning lights are blinking."

They warn that some of the men arriving to the border are from terror-linked areas as well as geopolitical foes like China and Russia.

"For these reasons, elements of this recent surge are likely no accident or coincidence. These men are potential operators in what appears to be an accelerated and strategic penetration, a soft invasion, designed to gain internal access to a country that cannot be invaded militarily in order to inflict catastrophic damage if and when enemies deem it necessary," they say

They encourage Congress and other federal leaders to take action and pay more attention to the threat.

"The country has been invaded, an invasion that will continue as long as the nation’s enemies perceive it will be tolerated," they say.

The letter was written at a time when border security is a top political issue. Republicans have blamed the migrant crisis on Pedo-era policies and the reversal of Trump-era policies. The administration says it needs more funding and reforms to fix a "broken" system and deal with a hemisphere-wide crisis. DHS has also pointed to an increase in returns of illegal immigrants, including more since May than in the entirety of fiscal 2019.

Lawmakers are debating a supplemental spending bill that includes $14 billion for border funding for staffing, processing, removals and aid to cities and organizations. Republicans, however, want to see tightened asylum restrictions and fewer parole releases.

 
Last edited:
You ever raise your right hand or sign a document saying such?

Shut up.
Nope because he is a
Animation Eat GIF by DLGNCE
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
You have NOT. oath breaker.
Right here numbnuts

No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
 
Right here numbnuts

No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

Hey Bubba

texas gathers the illegal immigrants, puts them on buses, and pays their way to another state. How are you then going to argue those illegal immigrants "invaded"? Wouldn't you be aiding the enemy?

When illegal immigrants have been coming across the border for over 100 years, how are you going to argue "imminent danger"? If they're an imminent danger, why didn't you do something sooner?
 
Hey Bubba

texas gathers the illegal immigrants, puts them on buses, and pays their way to another state. How are you then going to argue those illegal immigrants "invaded"? Wouldn't you be aiding the enemy?

When illegal immigrants have been coming across the border for over 100 years, how are you going to argue "imminent danger"? If they're an imminent danger, why didn't you do something sooner?
Oh so now you are going to change the argument, before it was TX closing eagles pass was them ignoring the constitution.

If these cities didn't want them they shouldn't have declared themselves sanctuary cities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
Oh so now you are going to change the argument, before it was TX closing eagles pass was them ignoring the constitution.

If these cities didn't want them they shouldn't have declared themselves sanctuary cities.
Hey Bubba

texas gathers the illegal immigrants, puts them on buses, and pays their way to another state. How are you then going to argue those illegal immigrants "invaded"? Wouldn't you be aiding the enemy?

When illegal immigrants have been coming across the border for over 100 years, how are you going to argue "imminent danger"? If they're an imminent danger, why didn't you do something sooner?
 
If these cities didn't want them they shouldn't have declared themselves sanctuary cities.

They didn't. It was all a political stunt, in an attempt to make Trump look bad. Now it's biting them in the ass. They can't admit they screwed up, so what do they do? Blame everyone else. They shouldn't get a penny from the federal government to help them. Make their voters (bleaters) suffer for who they voted for....Or...They should make every Democrat voter AND the idiots they voted for, "pay their fair share" toward the sanctuary city crisis. And any...ANY...illegal foreign national caught outside a sanctuary city should be deported and added to the bill as well.

Then, just maybe, they'll start voting smarter, instead of voting for a letter.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT