ADVERTISEMENT

Again...We have a serious spending problem and our government's answer is to tax us more...

Your net income hasn't decreased, dumbass. That's what's not getting through your empty skull.

You're being told to stop wasteful and unnecessary spending, dumbass.

You're cutting COSTS not INCOME.

Asking for MORE income is ludicrous when you're WASTING so much money.

Stop being a dumbass, dumbass.
Oh my. What is the Wayne Co rube debating? Tell me he's not attempting to draw parallels of govt being like a for-profit business. Holy shit.
 
Oh my. What is the Wayne Co rube debating? Tell me he's not attempting to draw parallels of govt being like a for-profit business. Holy shit.

He's saying our government needs more income and the rich should pay it. Just more dumbassery.
 
Remove the magats and the size of the federal gov't decreases. Go...

GDP is at a record high. It's been that way Biden's entire presidency.

That's already been accomplished.
Not high enough. Just think of what we could do as a country. Look at our growth in the last couple of decades. We are basically stagnate
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
Your net income hasn't decreased, dumbass. That's what's not getting through your empty skull.

You're being told to stop wasteful and unnecessary spending, dumbass.

You're cutting COSTS not INCOME.

Asking for MORE income is ludicrous when you're WASTING so much money.

Stop being a dumbass, dumbass.
ou're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year.

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production.

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased.

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

What's going on??
 
Oh my. What is the Wayne Co rube debating? Tell me he's not attempting to draw parallels of govt being like a for-profit business. Holy shit.
ou're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year.

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production.

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased.

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

What's going on??
 
  • Haha
Reactions: raleighherdfan
He's saying our government needs more income and the rich should pay it. Just more dumbassery.
ou're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year.

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production.

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased.

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

What's going on??
 
Not high enough. Just think of what we could do as a country. Look at our growth in the last couple of decades. We are basically stagnate
ou're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year.

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production.

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased.

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

What's going on??
 
ou're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year.

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production.

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased.

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

What's going on??
why would you not want to grow more. The US economy could do way better and grow in size. We have given up our industrial base and innovation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
No more proof is needed as to why the hick out Wayne was never able to grow his business beyond the size of a woodshed.

The problem with the situation is that the scenario demonstrates just how unproductive and inefficient the government is. He’s making the case for DOGE and he doesn’t even realize it. There is a reason why guys like Elon build multi billion $$ companies and the hick remained in the woodshed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
why would you not want to grow more. The US economy could do way better and grow in size. We have given up our industrial base and innovation.
The U.S economy has been growing continually, except for the republican recessions, for the last 75 years. You idiot.
 
No more proof is needed as to why the hick out Wayne was never able to grow his business beyond the size of a woodshed.

The problem with the situation is that the scenario demonstrates just how unproductive and inefficient the government is. He’s making the case for DOGE and he doesn’t even realize it. There is a reason why guys like Elon build multi billion $$ companies and the hick remained in the woodshed.
You're an idiot. Either you aren't able to put 2+2 together or you stupidly refuse to answer the question.

You're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year.

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production.

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased.

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

What's going on??
 
If a company has increased productivity the natural occurrence should be a reduction in spending and lower % cost on that production.

It’s basic economics. Increased productivity rarely lowers net income. Increased productivity improves net income by improving efficiencies and eliminating nonproductive parts of the operation.

Your “situation” demonstrates why the govt is broken. Its inefficiencies compound the nonproductive parts of its bureaucracy. Thank you for pointing that out in your example.
 
You're an idiot. Either you aren't able to put 2+2 together or you stupidly refuse to answer the question.

You're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year by 797%

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production by 6%

You've reduced your work force by 9%

Your work force compensation is 5% of your company's income

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased by 13%

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

You think your best move is to reduce income.

What's going on??
 
You're an idiot. Either you aren't able to put 2+2 together or you stupidly refuse to answer the question.

You're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year by 797%

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production by 6%

You've reduced your work force by 9%

Your work force compensation is 5% of your company's income

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased by 13%

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

You think your best move is to reduce income.

What's going on??

What's going on? You're showing everyone how ignorant you are and you're doing a fantastic job.
 
You're an idiot. Either you aren't able to put 2+2 together or you stupidly refuse to answer the question.

You're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year by 797%

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production by 6%

You've reduced your work force by 9%

Your work force compensation is 5% of your company's income

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased by 13%

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

You think your best move is to reduce income.

What's going on??
 
You're an idiot. Either you aren't able to put 2+2 together or you stupidly refuse to answer the question.

You're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year by 797%

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production by 6%

You've reduced your work force by 9%

Your work force compensation is 5% of your company's income

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased by 13%

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

You think your best move is to reduce income.

What's going on??
 
You're an idiot. Either you aren't able to put 2+2 together or you stupidly refuse to answer the question.

You're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year by 797%

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production by 6%

You've reduced your work force by 9%

Your work force compensation is 5% of your company's income

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased by 13%

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

You think your best move is to reduce income.

What's going on??
Are you seriously trying to compare a govt to a for profit business as if they’re the same? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Go back to high school and try again inbred. You just keep demonstrating why govt and it’s bloated bureaucracy is the most inefficient system there is.
 
Are you seriously trying to compare a govt to a for profit business as if they’re the same? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Go back to high school and try again inbred. You just keep demonstrating why govt and it’s bloated bureaucracy is the most inefficient system there is.
You're an idiot. Either you aren't able to put 2+2 together or you stupidly refuse to answer the question.

You're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year by 797%

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production by 6%

You've reduced your work force by 9%

Your work force compensation is 5% of your company's income

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased by 13%

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

You think your best move is to reduce income.

What's going on??
 
He has a very, very low I. Q.
You're an idiot. Either you aren't able to put 2+2 together or you stupidly refuse to answer the question.

You're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year by 797%

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production by 6%

You've reduced your work force by 9%

Your work force compensation is 5% of your company's income

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased by 13%

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

You think your best move is to reduce income.

What's going on??
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT