ADVERTISEMENT

Again...We have a serious spending problem and our government's answer is to tax us more...

Your net income hasn't decreased, dumbass. That's what's not getting through your empty skull.

You're being told to stop wasteful and unnecessary spending, dumbass.

You're cutting COSTS not INCOME.

Asking for MORE income is ludicrous when you're WASTING so much money.

Stop being a dumbass, dumbass.
Oh my. What is the Wayne Co rube debating? Tell me he's not attempting to draw parallels of govt being like a for-profit business. Holy shit.
 
Oh my. What is the Wayne Co rube debating? Tell me he's not attempting to draw parallels of govt being like a for-profit business. Holy shit.

He's saying our government needs more income and the rich should pay it. Just more dumbassery.
 
Remove the magats and the size of the federal gov't decreases. Go...

GDP is at a record high. It's been that way Biden's entire presidency.

That's already been accomplished.
Not high enough. Just think of what we could do as a country. Look at our growth in the last couple of decades. We are basically stagnate
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
Your net income hasn't decreased, dumbass. That's what's not getting through your empty skull.

You're being told to stop wasteful and unnecessary spending, dumbass.

You're cutting COSTS not INCOME.

Asking for MORE income is ludicrous when you're WASTING so much money.

Stop being a dumbass, dumbass.
ou're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year.

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production.

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased.

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

What's going on??
 
Oh my. What is the Wayne Co rube debating? Tell me he's not attempting to draw parallels of govt being like a for-profit business. Holy shit.
ou're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year.

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production.

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased.

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

What's going on??
 
  • Haha
Reactions: raleighherdfan
He's saying our government needs more income and the rich should pay it. Just more dumbassery.
ou're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year.

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production.

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased.

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

What's going on??
 
Not high enough. Just think of what we could do as a country. Look at our growth in the last couple of decades. We are basically stagnate
ou're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year.

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production.

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased.

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

What's going on??
 
ou're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year.

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production.

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased.

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

What's going on??
why would you not want to grow more. The US economy could do way better and grow in size. We have given up our industrial base and innovation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
No more proof is needed as to why the hick out Wayne was never able to grow his business beyond the size of a woodshed.

The problem with the situation is that the scenario demonstrates just how unproductive and inefficient the government is. He’s making the case for DOGE and he doesn’t even realize it. There is a reason why guys like Elon build multi billion $$ companies and the hick remained in the woodshed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
why would you not want to grow more. The US economy could do way better and grow in size. We have given up our industrial base and innovation.
The U.S economy has been growing continually, except for the republican recessions, for the last 75 years. You idiot.
 
No more proof is needed as to why the hick out Wayne was never able to grow his business beyond the size of a woodshed.

The problem with the situation is that the scenario demonstrates just how unproductive and inefficient the government is. He’s making the case for DOGE and he doesn’t even realize it. There is a reason why guys like Elon build multi billion $$ companies and the hick remained in the woodshed.
You're an idiot. Either you aren't able to put 2+2 together or you stupidly refuse to answer the question.

You're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year.

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production.

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased.

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

What's going on??
 
If a company has increased productivity the natural occurrence should be a reduction in spending and lower % cost on that production.

It’s basic economics. Increased productivity rarely lowers net income. Increased productivity improves net income by improving efficiencies and eliminating nonproductive parts of the operation.

Your “situation” demonstrates why the govt is broken. Its inefficiencies compound the nonproductive parts of its bureaucracy. Thank you for pointing that out in your example.
 
You're an idiot. Either you aren't able to put 2+2 together or you stupidly refuse to answer the question.

You're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year by 797%

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production by 6%

You've reduced your work force by 9%

Your work force compensation is 5% of your company's income

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased by 13%

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

You think your best move is to reduce income.

What's going on??
 
You're an idiot. Either you aren't able to put 2+2 together or you stupidly refuse to answer the question.

You're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year by 797%

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production by 6%

You've reduced your work force by 9%

Your work force compensation is 5% of your company's income

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased by 13%

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

You think your best move is to reduce income.

What's going on??

What's going on? You're showing everyone how ignorant you are and you're doing a fantastic job.
 
You're an idiot. Either you aren't able to put 2+2 together or you stupidly refuse to answer the question.

You're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year by 797%

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production by 6%

You've reduced your work force by 9%

Your work force compensation is 5% of your company's income

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased by 13%

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

You think your best move is to reduce income.

What's going on??
 
You're an idiot. Either you aren't able to put 2+2 together or you stupidly refuse to answer the question.

You're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year by 797%

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production by 6%

You've reduced your work force by 9%

Your work force compensation is 5% of your company's income

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased by 13%

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

You think your best move is to reduce income.

What's going on??
 
You're an idiot. Either you aren't able to put 2+2 together or you stupidly refuse to answer the question.

You're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year by 797%

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production by 6%

You've reduced your work force by 9%

Your work force compensation is 5% of your company's income

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased by 13%

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

You think your best move is to reduce income.

What's going on??
Are you seriously trying to compare a govt to a for profit business as if they’re the same? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Go back to high school and try again inbred. You just keep demonstrating why govt and it’s bloated bureaucracy is the most inefficient system there is.
 
Are you seriously trying to compare a govt to a for profit business as if they’re the same? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Go back to high school and try again inbred. You just keep demonstrating why govt and it’s bloated bureaucracy is the most inefficient system there is.
You're an idiot. Either you aren't able to put 2+2 together or you stupidly refuse to answer the question.

You're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year by 797%

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production by 6%

You've reduced your work force by 9%

Your work force compensation is 5% of your company's income

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased by 13%

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

You think your best move is to reduce income.

What's going on??
 
He has a very, very low I. Q.
You're an idiot. Either you aren't able to put 2+2 together or you stupidly refuse to answer the question.

You're an idiot.

What's the problem with the following situation?....

You have a business that has continued to increase production year after year after year by 797%

You have decreased spending as a percentage of that production by 6%

You've reduced your work force by 9%

Your work force compensation is 5% of your company's income

Your net income as a percentage of that production has decreased by 13%

You have to borrow money to keep the business operating.

You think your best move is to reduce income.

What's going on??
 
Who in their right mind is saying we need higher taxes when we have a terrible spending problem?

The Pentagon failed its 7th consecutive audit (budget: $826B). The Department of Education just failed to receive a clean audit for its 3rd time in a row (budget: $268B). USDA showed significant deficiencies across multiple divisions (budget: $203B). Auditors declined to give a clean opinion to AmeriCorps (budget: $1B).

- $236 Billion in improper payments in federal programs in 2023
- $200 Billion in pandemic relief went to fraud/abuse
- The U.S. failed to track $1 Billion in Ukraine Aid

"In FY2024, U.S. Congress provided $516 billion to programs whose authorizations previously expired under federal law," the DOGE X account posted on Nov. 16. "Nearly $320 billion of that $516 billion expired more a decade ago."

Most federal workers don’t physically show up, yet the cost of maintaining & providing energy for govt office buildings is $15BN/year (not counting billions more spent on office furnishings). The government owns 7,967 vacant buildings.

In 2023 NIH spent $759 million on workforce diversity and outreach, over $611,000 on "Evaluating Microaggressions among Latinx Individuals with Obesity," and $87,944 on the "Role of the estrous cycle and nucleus accumbens signaling on incubation of oxycodone craving in female rats.

The federal government loses between $233 billion and $521 billion each year due to fraud.
Are you one of these fat cats or perhaps an upper class person who got 2 percent tax break on that last massive Trump tax cut?. If not then why are you making such an issue of it.?
 
Are you one of these fat cats or perhaps an upper class person who got 2 percent tax break on that last massive Trump tax cut?. If not then why are you making such an issue of it.?

No I'm one of the average Americans who experienced a tax hike in the midst of the out-of-control spending, waste and fraud. Aren't you sick of it?

I sure am.
 
Are you one of these fat cats or perhaps an upper class person who got 2 percent tax break
You speak of a 2% tax break as too small, but then attempt to say a company making less than 2% on a dollar is gouging?? Do you ever get tired of making an absolute fool of yourself??
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
You speak of a 2% tax break as too small, but then attempt to say a company making less than 2% on a dollar is gouging?? Do you ever get tired of making an absolute fool of yourself??
That is not a good comparison and you know it? Are you saying then it is the middle man who is making a killing on it because I still say it is not the farmer.
 
That is not a good comparison and you know it? Are you saying then it is the middle man who is making a killing on it because I still say it is not the farmer.
Its a perfect comparison when dealing with your idiocy.

The govt is making the killing on it. Sales taxes, transportation taxes, fuel taxes, taxes on sale of feed, fertilizer, etc. The states produce nothing, grow nothing, sell nothing....but reap $billions in income. Yes, Govt is the ultimate "middleman" sucking money out of the producers and sellers pockets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
Its a perfect comparison when dealing with your idiocy.

The govt is making the killing on it. Sales taxes, transportation taxes, fuel taxes, taxes on sale of feed, fertilizer, etc. The states produce nothing, grow nothing, sell nothing....but reap $billions in income. Yes, Govt is the ultimate "middleman" sucking money out of the producers and sellers pockets.
You're an idiot. A lying idiot.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT