ADVERTISEMENT

BREAKING NEWS ! WAPO CNN MSNBC NYTIMES CBS NBC ABC ALL REPORTING BUZFEED STORY INCORRECT

dherd

Platinum Buffalo
Feb 23, 2007
11,203
556
113
Less than 24 hours after the news site BuzzFeed reported that the president instructed his personal attorney to lie to Congress about his push for a Moscow real estate project, special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s office put out a statement firmly disputing the reporting.

THANK GOODNESS WE GOT THE TRUTH. ON THIS STORY RE SUBORNING PERJURY.

SO FAR NO DENIAL FROM SPECIAL COUNCIL ON ANY REPORTS FROM MAJOR NEWS ORGS.
.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...directed-cohen-to-lie/?utm_term=.3db818bf6bec
 
WE'LL SEE HOW IT ALL SHAKES OUT - YOU STICK WITH TRUMP FOR THE TRUTH - I'LL STICK WITH
THE NATIONAL PRESS FOR THE TRUTH.
BUZZFEED IS STANDING BY ITS STORY.
WE WILL SEE IF OTHER NEWS ORGS CAN CONFIRM IT, AND WHAT COHEN SAYS
IN THREE WEEKS WHEN HE TESTIFIES TO CONGRESS (IF TRUMP DOES NOT INTIMIDATE THE WITNESS INTO NOT TALKING BY THREATENING HIS FATHER IN LAW AS HE HAS DONE THE PAST FEW DAYS)

“BuzzFeed’s description of specific statements to the special counsel’s office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen’s congressional testimony are not accurate,” said Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller.

DOES NOT SAY TRUMP DIDNT TELL HIM TO LIE, AND DOESNT SAY IT DIDNT COME FROM ANOTHER OFFICE LIKE SDNY FOR EXAMPLE.
 
Last edited:
WE'LL SEE HOW IT ALL SHAKES OUT - YOU STICK WITH TRUMP FOR THE TRUTH - I'LL STICK WITH
THE NATIONAL PRESS FOR THE TRUTH.
BUZZFEED IS STANDING BY ITS STORY.
WE WILL SEE IF OTHER NEWS ORGS CAN CONFIRM IT, AND WHAT COHEN SAYS
IN THREE WEEKS WHEN HE TESTIFIES TO CONGRESS (IF TRUMP DOES NOT INTIMIDATE THE WITNESS INTO NOT TALKING BY THREATENING HIS FATHER IN LAW AS HE HAS DONE THE PAST FEW DAYS)

“BuzzFeed’s description of specific statements to the special counsel’s office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen’s congressional testimony are not accurate,” said Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller.
if that is the case, then mueller's office has a leak.

I have a feeling old mueller is on thin ice when the new AG starts next week.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
WE'LL SEE HOW IT ALL SHAKES OUT - YOU STICK WITH TRUMP FOR THE TRUTH - I'LL STICK WITH
THE NATIONAL PRESS FOR THE TRUTH.
BUZZFEED IS STANDING BY ITS STORY.
WE WILL SEE IF OTHER NEWS ORGS CAN CONFIRM IT, AND WHAT COHEN SAYS
IN THREE WEEKS WHEN HE TESTIFIES TO CONGRESS (IF TRUMP DOES NOT INTIMIDATE THE WITNESS INTO NOT TALKING BY THREATENING HIS FATHER IN LAW AS HE HAS DONE THE PAST FEW DAYS)

“BuzzFeed’s description of specific statements to the special counsel’s office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen’s congressional testimony are not accurate,” said Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller.

DOES NOT SAY TRUMP DIDNT TELL HIM TO LIE, AND DOESNT SAY IT DIDNT COME FROM ANOTHER OFFICE LIKE SDNY FOR EXAMPLE.
The mueller statement just says that the buzzfeed characterization of every bit of proof they offered in their article is basically wrong. But yeah keep waiting until someone else verifies it

While you wait here’s the New York Times verifying something... and it’s not the buzzfeed story.
 
In court documents, Cohen admitted that he briefed Trump on his ongoing negotiations with Russian officials about the proposed deal and said that he had consulted with Trump’s team before his false testimony before Congress. But those documents did not indicate that Trump played a direct role in his false testimony.

NOW IS THAT THE RUSSIAN DEAL THAT TRUMP HAS BEEN DENYING FOR 3 YEARS?
 
The real VICTIMS in this whole fiasco is the press. How dare Muellers office push back on fake news.



 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
Dtard read something on BuzzFeed, which is the equivalent in reporting to Bleacher Report (where any hack with a keyboard can write stuff) and started shouting praises to Allah.

He also text his ISIS buddies. BTW, I heard they wouldn't take Dtard, because he has one leg way shorter than the other, and has to wear a shoe with the thick sole.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WV-FAN
oh, goodie - the urinator is back - losts of fun ahead with puddles.
 
oh, goodie - the urinator is back - losts of fun ahead with puddles.

Does my urination excite you? Thinking about collecting it in used bottles to store in your closet? Usually you just store/collect your own, but I guess your psychosis is worsening.
 
I’m curious how Buzzfeed broke the article. Was it...”Ten Things in the Mueller Report That Can Bring Down the Presidency,” listicle? What a freaking joke. Only in today’s world do you have to run every source through bias check sites and fact checkers before you know what to believe. And then you have to bias and fact check the fact check sites as well. These are the sites that consistently are rated among the highest for accurate ratings of news sources and fact checking...

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/
https://www.politifact.com/
https://www.factcheck.org/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/?utm_term=.487a02c58d7d
https://www.opensecrets.org/

If you run Buzzfeed through mediabiasfactcheck.com you get the following...

Left-Center Bias Lean
Mixed Factual Reporting

Also Fox...

Moderate to Strong Right Bias
Mixed Factual Reporting

CNN...

Moderate to Strong Liberal Bias
Mixed Factual Reporting

I personally only allow sites that are rated “Highly” for factual reporting into my news feed. I’m okay with left-center, right-center, and “least-biased” rated sites.


The sad thing about all of this is it is obscuring the fact that yesterday morning before this Buzzfeed thing broke, there was enough factual reporting and indictments and prosecutions within the Trump inner circle to give a very clear picture about this presidency. A day later one story has shifted sentiment. But before you gloat too much, remember that in the era of the 24 hour news cycle, a story breaking today or tomorrow can shift everything again. Don’t be blinded by this fool’s gold. Trump is still the same lying megalomaniac that he was yesterday morning.

Kudos to Mueller for setting the record straight. But I have to say after reading a few of the comments here, I don’t know how you can think that “Mueller is on thin ice.” If anything it legitimizes his quest for the truth. You can’t have it both ways..you can’t believe this is evidence of a witch hunt by Mueller and use his own statement to verify it.
 
Fake news is real. Started with Dan Rather(probably before). Then, these left wing news agencies(i.e. mainstream media) run with it in order to try to get Trump. They are so far in the back pocket of the left it is not funny. There is no longer an independent press in this country.

Mueller had to report the news as being fake because if he didn't he was going to be summarily fired by the new Attorney General. If Mueller would have said nothing and the new AG says, Mr Mueller is this report true? And, if he says "yes" then that means his office leaked it. Mueller had to set the record straight it was either a false story or if it would have been true then he or someone leaked highly confidential material.

I have a feeling Mueller's day may be numbered with the new AG taking over. This bull shit is going to have to end.
 
Fake news is real. Started with Dan Rather(probably before). Then, these left wing news agencies(i.e. mainstream media) run with it in order to try to get Trump. They are so far in the back pocket of the left it is not funny. There is no longer an independent press in this country.

Mueller had to report the news as being fake because if he didn't he was going to be summarily fired by the new Attorney General. If Mueller would have said nothing and the new AG says, Mr Mueller is this report true? And, if he says "yes" then that means his office leaked it.

I have a feeling Mueller's day may be numbered with the new AG taking over. This bull shit is going to have to end.

You're an idiot.
 
You're an idiot.
that's why a former federal judge said the same thing last night.

Mueller had no choice but to either set the record straight or tell the New AG that it is true and it got leaked to the press.
 
probably before would be the correct answer. Extra began spouting out the fake news back in 1965.
Cronkite was actually the first with interjecting his opinion on the Vietnam war. Reporters went from sharing facts to giving their opinions and then it went to making shit up to get a story.
 
that's why a former federal judge said the same thing last night.

Mueller had no choice but to either set the record straight or tell the New AG that it is true and it got leaked to the press.

Like I said, you'r an idiot. You agree with cheetos that this entire thing is a witch hunt led by a crooked special investigator, but as soon as he says something you agree with you swallow it hook, line, and sinker.
 
Like I said, you'r an idiot. You agree with cheetos that this entire thing is a witch hunt led by a crooked special investigator, but as soon as he says something you agree with you swallow it hook, line, and sinker.
I think it is a witch hunt. Mainly because the Democrats lost and Comey got fired which pissed the FBI off. I have never really commented on Mr Mueller much. That being said, he had no choice to make an announcement if it was false. If it would have been true he and his office were in deep trouble.
 
I think it is a witch hunt. Mainly because the Democrats lost and Comey got fired which pissed the FBI off.

Just like I said^^^
The US shouldn't investigate the russian meddling in the election. Everyone knows this. We should simply ignore that the Australian intelligence agency (a known enemy of the U S) informed us of knowledge that our best friends (Russia) had a larger role in meddling than previously thought. The convictions since then are lies from a witch hunt led by a corrupt fbi. I repeat, you're an idiot.
 
Just like I said^^^
The US shouldn't investigate the russian meddling in the election. Everyone knows this. We should simply ignore that the Australian intelligence agency (a known enemy of the U S) informed us of knowledge that our best friends (Russia) had a larger role in meddling than previously thought. The convictions since then are lies from a witch hunt led by a corrupt fbi. I repeat, you're an idiot.
go ahead and investigate it. what do you have on Trump? Nada

we mess in other people's elections as well.
 
Rich. Mueller being accused of running a witch hunt after the following...


Jailed:

Cohen
Papadopoulos
Zwaan
Pinedo


Convicted:

Manafort



Pleaded Guilty:

Flynn
Gates


Charged:

13 foreign nationals
3 Russian companies
12 GRU Russian Intelligence officers

And a Partridge in a pear tree.
 
go ahead and investigate it. what do you have on Trump? Nada

we mess in other people's elections as well.
Frankly, I'm all for putting every President through this from now on. To this same extent with the same broad net. Especially if they've served as an elected official. And all their cohorts are fair game with no statute of limitations.
 
Rich. Mueller being accused of running a witch hunt after the following...


Jailed:

Cohen
Papadopoulos
Zwaan
Pinedo


Convicted:

Manafort



Pleaded Guilty:

Flynn
Gates


Charged:

13 foreign nationals
3 Russian companies
12 GRU Russian Intelligence officers

And a Partridge in a pear tree.
Don't forget the multiple firings & resignations within the "intelligence" communities. This isn't a shot at you, GK, but no one ever brings these up. The more that comes out about Ohr's testimony, the worse it looks for them.
 
Don't forget the multiple firings & resignations within the "intelligence" communities. This isn't a shot at you, GK, but no one ever brings these up. The more that comes out about Ohr's testimony, the worse it looks for them.

I seldom take replies to me as shots. I’m not that thin skinned. If I was I certainly wouldn’t post my position on global warming and our president on this board with the overwhelming amount of Trump supporters and deniers. I’ve raised the ire of both sides over the years so I certainly don’t post looking for validation. If you disagree (and you really didn’t in this case) let me have it. I just hope that the disagreement is backed by thoughtful and fact based arguments.


I’d be interested in you listing those in the intelligence agencies that you reference for fairness. I know of the two agents (lovers) tweeting obvious anti trump stuff to each other causing dismissal. But What are the resignations and what did they resign for?
 
Rich. Mueller being accused of running a witch hunt after the following...


Jailed:

Cohen
Papadopoulos
Zwaan
Pinedo


Convicted:

Manafort



Pleaded Guilty:

Flynn
Gates


Charged:

13 foreign nationals
3 Russian companies
12 GRU Russian Intelligence officers

And a Partridge in a pear tree.
Flynn will ending up getting a pardon dow the road. His case is totally different
 
Flynn will ending up getting a pardon dow the road. His case is totally different

That doesn’t change culpability. He admitted to lying about conversations with the Russian Ambassador. Why would he lie to the FBI, something that is a crime, if there wasn’t a reason to do so?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raoul Duke MU
Rich. Mueller being accused of running a witch hunt after the following...


Jailed:

Cohen
Papadopoulos
Zwaan
Pinedo


Convicted:

Manafort



Pleaded Guilty:

Flynn
Gates


Charged:

13 foreign nationals
3 Russian companies
12 GRU Russian Intelligence officers

And a Partridge in a pear tree.

Yep. 13 Russian (names) we assume actually exist, 2 Russian companies? (Huuuuuuge accomplishment), papadupe (already a free man because he had nothing on trump), Flynn (nothing related to trump), manafort( still no collusion). Zwan & Pinedo (who? Sounds like it may be a case of institutional racism)

You would be better off just saying the Buzzfeed article has merit.
 
I seldom take replies to me as shots. I’m not that thin skinned. If I was I certainly wouldn’t post my position on global warming and our president on this board with the overwhelming amount of Trump supporters and deniers. I’ve raised the ire of both sides over the years so I certainly don’t post looking for validation. If you disagree (and you really didn’t in this case) let me have it. I just hope that the disagreement is backed by thoughtful and fact based arguments.


I’d be interested in you listing those in the intelligence agencies that you reference for fairness. I know of the two agents (lovers) tweeting obvious anti trump stuff to each other causing dismissal. But What are the resignations and what did they resign for?
The Strzok & Page scenario goes far beyond just two lovers tweeting. Their roles in the investigation were pretty extensive. And Strzok was almost as hellbent on removing Trump as Steele was. The more of Ohr's testimony that comes to light, the more the agencies look petty & vindictive. I would consider Comey's dismissal as a huge step in the right direction to clean up the agency. He admitted to leaking info, was guilty of doing the exact same thing he was investigating Clinton for (& even acknowledged it), the shit he allowed Cheryl Mills to get away with in the investigation was questionably absurd, & drafts show he changed his language drastically on his thoughts about Hillary. I don't think it's a stretch to say he specifically worded his response to the severity so it couldn't come back to bite him for engaging in the same activity. A number of his subordinates have resigned.

McCabe's 86'ing was attributed to him lying about leaking info. Baker's now under investigation for leaking info. There are still questions around Campbell's sudden resignation & immediate hiring by CNN. The list goes on.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT