ADVERTISEMENT

Buyers Remorse

And we gave weapons to ISIS
LOL

You see no issue with Iran supporting terror "brothers". Gotcha. You know that innocent Iraqis were victims of Iranian sponsored terror long before Americans stepped foot there, right? I remember when Libs laughed at Trump because he confused Kurds with Quds. I'm sure you were one of them. Hell, according to your post you support Quds force.
 
LOL

You see no issue with Iran supporting terror "brothers". Gotcha. You know that innocent Iraqis were victims of Iranian sponsored terror long before Americans stepped foot there, right? I remember when Libs laughed at Trump because he confused Kurds with Quds. I'm sure you were one of them. Hell, according to your post you support Quds force.

If that's the case, why did we invade Iraq, all that did was strengthen Iran. Come on, we are America and we play both sides of wars while our soldiers die for paper glory.
 
That first sentence made no sense at all. And I'm pretty sure it was Obama who strengthened Iran.
 
As a start, in 2003 the United States eliminated Iran’s major border threats: Iraq’s Saddam Hussein to the west and the Taliban in Afghanistan to the east.

Iran supported Shia and Shiite in Iraq prior to 2003, providing funds, training, weapons, logistics... The State Dept reported Iran supported the Taliban in SUTs, and A&E. Same with AQ. So no, Iran already had their dick beaters all over Iraq before 2003.

BTW, Iraq is to the East and Afghanistan is to the West.
 
SUT -Small unit tactics
A&E - Arms and eplosives

Sorry, I speak in acronyms.
 
To add more context, Saddam was Sunni. Iran is mainly Shia. Hence their support of.
 
Simple question.....which is in better shape now than before we invaded, iran or iraq?
 
Iraq fared pretty well. The Dinar was strong as hell the last decade. We paid for and built their entire infrastructure, rebuilt and funded their government and elections, gave them free training and rearmed the entire country (three times, but that's another story), provided security for their elected officials...All while growing Iraq's GDP over 300%. People made a killing in international investments during that time. So there's an argument to be made. Nice try at deflection though.
 
You're deflecting, not me. Are you changing your previous answer of Iran doing better?
 
You're deflecting, not me. Are you changing your previous answer of Iran doing better?

As a start, in 2003 the United States eliminated Iran’s major border threats: Iraq’s Saddam Hussein to the west and the Taliban in Afghanistan to the east.

You're deflecting from this fail. Class is over. Lick your wounds and come back tomorrow.
 
You're deflecting from this fail. Class is over. Lick your wounds and come back tomorrow.

Seriously, you think weakening Iraq didn't play into the hands of Iran?

In what way?

As a start, in 2003 the United States eliminated Iran’s major border threats: Iraq’s Saddam Hussein to the west and the Taliban in Afghanistan to the east.

Simple question.....which is in better shape now than before we invaded, iran or iraq?

Iran, after 3.5 Billion in cash.

Take your own advice. Only don't come back.
 
Ok, foreign policy expert who doesn't know east from west, how is Iran better off? And why?
 
I already told you. The United States eliminated Iran’s major border threats. Al queda is reduced. Taliban reduced.
 
How is Iran's impact reduced when they already support Taliban and AQ? Don't give me an Obama reelection quote, give me something that disputes the State Depts findings.
 
If the sunni taliban and sunni alqueda along with sunni ran iraq were such good buddies with shia iran, then the removal of iraq and afghanistan as border enemies would be false.
 
What you just posted doesnt match anything you just said.

But what the graph does show is White on White crime is getting out of control. Damn Addicts


there is a picture from the FBI crime stats page and a link to a police shooting tracker from the Washington Post. i know it's a lot to ask to interpret more than one source of data, but i assumed your genetically superior brain would handle it with ease...
 
Iran supported Shia and Shiite in Iraq prior to 2003, providing funds, training, weapons, logistics... The State Dept reported Iran supported the Taliban in SUTs, and A&E. Same with AQ. So no, Iran already had their dick beaters all over Iraq before 2003.

BTW, Iraq is to the East and Afghanistan is to the West.

So once again, why didnt we not attack Iran instead of Iraq which was no threat.
 
To add more context, Saddam was Sunni. Iran is mainly Shia. Hence their support of.

And Saddam was also kiling off a bunch of Shia Muslims. So Iran was supporting the suppressed and we find fault. That is so American.
 
Iraq fared pretty well. The Dinar was strong as hell the last decade. We paid for and built their entire infrastructure, rebuilt and funded their government and elections, gave them free training and rearmed the entire country (three times, but that's another story), provided security for their elected officials...All while growing Iraq's GDP over 300%. People made a killing in international investments during that time. So there's an argument to be made. Nice try at deflection though.

Yea thats the least we can do after destroying the country for unnecessary reason while our Soldiers died for Paper Glory
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT