ADVERTISEMENT

Cheryl Mills: State Department Official Had 148 Phone Messages from Clinton Foundation

andy4theherd

Platinum Buffalo
Gold Member
Sep 1, 2007
15,652
3,018
113
Mills, who was Hillary Clinton's chief of staff when she was Secretary of State, received the messages from the foundation's Chief Operating Officer Laura Graham from 2010 to 2012, Fox News reported.


probably just harassing her about making a one-time donation like those "Fraternal Police" guys that call you at dinner time every night...

probably.........
 
Did Faux news discover any evidence of wrong doing?

A review of Hillary Clinton’s just-released schedules find that 85 of 154 people outside the government who met with Clinton at the State Department had first given money to the Clinton Foundation.

probably just another coincidence.... probably.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Walter Brennaneer
My my. How far the left has come. It seems like yesterday we continually heard the cries of corruption when it came to the Cheney/Haliburton relationship.

Hillary makes those accusations of impropriety look Busch league.
 
A review of Hillary Clinton’s just-released schedules find that 85 of 154 people outside the government who met with Clinton at the State Department had first given money to the Clinton Foundation.

probably just another coincidence.... probably.....

Waiting for evidence of wrongdoing or unethical conduct.......
 
Why don't you just type "derby derp derp"? It would have the value.

Just for fun, news comes out that Trumps #1 guy had taken 100+ calls from an organization that Trump had publicly said he was putting up a Chinese Wall to and then over half his private meetings were with people associated with that organization. You would be saying what? Would you be defending him?
 
Why don't you just type "derby derp derp"? It would have the value.

Just for fun, news comes out that Trumps #1 guy had taken 100+ calls from an organization that Trump had publicly said he was putting up a Chinese Wall to and then over half his private meetings were with people associated with that organization. You would be saying what? Would you be defending him?

Because the cons on here type that for you.
 
No need asking Greed hypothetical questions here. He will ask a hypothetical in reply and demand you answer his first Change the premise of the discussion, refuse to answer your question because you didn't provide a link to his rebuttal hypothetical, then alter the context of any comment you offer, before claiming he knows more than you (even if you are a professional in the subject matter being discussed).

Bottom line here .......he has no choice but support corruption. His hero Bernie even took a huge pay off after his charade run. Greed's even more pissed lately because Bernie didn't send his $20 donation back to him when he dropped out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
Only In extragreeds world is being late for work unethical but using the office of sec of state to fill coffers of personal foundation is not.

Only idiots like you think it's ethical to show up for work late and charitable foundations are a bad thing.
 
Only idiots like you think it's ethical to show up for work late and charitable foundations are a bad thing.
never said anything about charitable organizations being a bad thing. This is what you do. You completely change the argument from a singular organization to encompass all charities. You are incapable of havi an honest discussion about anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio herd
never said anything about charitable organizations being a bad thing. This is what you do. You completely change the argument from a singular organization to encompass all charities. You are incapable of havi an honest discussion about anything.

Is the Clinton foundation the personal foundation you're talking about?
 
ha ha I just Googled this headline Andy and it came up in the results column- LOL

Pullman Square has hit the big time!

By the way is there no tipping point with this woman? I mean every month there is something else.Though some may debate if there is no irrefutable evidence that Clinton was running a “pay-to-play” operation at the State Department, this latest revelation adds to the ever-growing mountain of circumstantial evidence that she is not honest.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: andy4theherd
14095785_629459890569616_1895923484948966130_n.jpg
 
ha ha I just Googled this headline Andy and it came up in the results column- LOL

Pullman Square has hit the big time!

By the way is there no tipping point with this woman? I mean every month there is something else.Though some may debate if there is no irrefutable evidence that Clinton was running a “pay-to-play” operation at the State Department, this latest revelation adds to the ever-growing mountain of circumstantial evidence that she is not honest.

There is evidence that the candidate you're voting for is a lying, cheating, russian loving flip flopper.
 
You're the definition of gullible.

easily persuaded to believe something; credulous

if that were even remotely true you, Dtard, and the mainstream media would have convinced me to put an "I'm with her" rainbow colored sign in my front yard...
 
easily persuaded to believe something; credulous

if that were even remotely true you, Dtard, and the mainstream media would have convinced me to put an "I'm with her" rainbow colored sign in my front yard...

Not when trump talks louder. The gullible follow loud.
 
Libs are still crying about Chenney/Haliburton while having a nothing to see here attitude toward SoS Clinton/CGF. Ridiculous.
 
that's what is scary...

deny
justify
accept
Either the Clinton's just happen to be the shinning light of ethics in a sea of Democrat corruption or they're two attorneys who have become quite adept at exploiting policies (or outright ignoring safeguards) that allow them benefit financially at the expense of our government. At this point, what does it matter because their supporters seem to want them to get away with it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT