Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And where’s our resident political scientist bashing this resolution, as pointless, like he did the live birth resolution a week or so ago?
Yeah that’s exactly the way you meant it.SOUTH CAROLINA'S SENIOR SENATOR SEEMS GAY TO ME.
WEBSTER:
Definition of gay
(Entry 1 of 3)
1a : happily excited : merry in a gay mood
b : keenly alive and exuberant : having or inducing high spirits a bird's gay spring song
2a : bright, lively gay sunny meadows
b : brilliant in color
3 : given to social pleasures
CONSERVATIVES COMPLAIN ABOUT EVERYTHING - EXCEPT THE THINGS THEY SHOULD
COMPLAIN ABOUT - LIKE RUSSIAN SPIES IN THE WHITE HOUSE - THAT THEY COVER UP.
CONS ARE ALWAYS POOR POWERLESS VICTIMS - EVEN WITH TOTAL CONTROL OF THE U.S. GOVT.
POOR, POOR HAPLESS CONSERVATIVES. = CRY ME A RIVER.
Just trying to figure out your double standards for calling things out.In the words of Roger Daltrey, who the fvck are you? I don't answer to your response time requirements. Ten minutes? GTFO. Shit, I don't even read half of dherd's posts (who does?).
If you truly want my opinion...you should know my opinion on non-binding resolutions, I think they are silly. As silly as you are to not know the "live birth act" was legislation and not a non-binding resolution.
Lindsay Graham gay ?? No way.A resolution that means absolutely NOTHING and a slur towards a sitting senator. Notice how it’s the Dems that make light of Lindsay Graham’s sexuality.
And where’s our resident political scientist bashing this resolution, as pointless, like he did the live birth resolution a week or so ago?
Just trying to figure out your double standards for calling things out.
You’ve got him now !240-0 unanimous vote to release Mueller report. 1 gay senator stops senate vote - what are they afraid we will learn?
ThunderCat98 said:
I'm the dumbest motherfvcker on this board
Having problems with the quote function there, Xenu? Thanks for proving my point.
You have no point. You are an idiot when you daily and purposely overlook the stupidity of your fellow cons AND attempt to defend a poster who has said one thing and only one thing 53 times.
Yeah. I mean it's not like he keeps replying "allahu akbar!" to the same thing over and over. 'Cause that's totally different.