ADVERTISEMENT

Energy-Positive Nuclear Fusion Accomplished

HerdandHokies

Platinum Buffalo
Feb 3, 2007
13,797
3,089
113
A link below but as usual for articles describing scientific discoveries it’s overhyping something that doesn’t need overhyped. But it’s still a major breakthrough that deserves to be celebrated.

For the first time we have created nuclear fusion in a lab that has positive energy produced. Some energy was shot into plasma, and more energy came out. We thought, but didn’t know, that this would be possible for us to do.

The (big) caveat is that the entire apparatus requires more energy than it produces. Mainly the containment field, but overall the test did not generate power, so it isn’t a matter of just scaling it up and having a power station. The containment tech needs refined as well as the energy capture. So we’re still, optimistically, a decade + from being able to really harness it.

But it’s still a huge deal. Before this we didn’t know for sure that it was possible for us to do, which hampered research. Now we do, and it looks like something that may be possible within some of our lifetimes. Fusion plants would be a game changer. We have the deuterium to run fusion plants to supply our power needs for longer than the sun will continue to burn.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Raoul Duke MU
I honestly thought this was going to be posted hours ago on here. If this does not bring @GK4Herd back, I do not know what will.
 
A link below but as usual for articles describing scientific discoveries it’s overhyping something that doesn’t need overhyped. But it’s still a major breakthrough that deserves to be celebrated.

For the first time we have created nuclear fusion in a lab that has positive energy produced. Some energy was shot into plasma, and more energy came out. We thought, but didn’t know, that this would be possible for us to do.

The (big) caveat is that the entire apparatus requires more energy than it produces. Mainly the containment field, but overall the test did not generate power, so it isn’t a matter of just scaling it up and having a power station. The containment tech needs refined as well as the energy capture. So we’re still, optimistically, a decade + from being able to really harness it.

But it’s still a huge deal. Before this we didn’t know for sure that it was possible for us to do, which hampered research. Now we do, and it looks like something that may be possible within some of our lifetimes. Fusion plants would be a game changer. We have the deuterium to run fusion plants to supply our power needs for longer than the sun will continue to burn.

This is a real solution for green energy. Not the government-forced, premature, collapse-of-civilization solar and wind movement they’re pushing now.
 
I only care about how long before it translate to a more efficient heat pump.
 
This is a real solution for green energy. Not the government-forced, premature, collapse-of-civilization solar and wind movement they’re pushing now.
…just a front for centralization of power.

If they were serious they would have pumped up nuclear and quit flying to Davos in private jets.

Climate change is one thing. Proposed “solutions” is another.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT