So an armed and violent attempt to overturn a free and fair election against the US government's certified election results is not an existential threat. What meets the bar for you? A successful overturn?
FBI Finds No Coordination in January 6
- Thread starter wvkeeper(HN)
- Start date
Hiding behind semantics? How about this?
The symptoms of Biden's disorder are easy to see and require simple observation.
Have you watched, side by side, videos of Biden from as recently as 2020 to today? The decline is very noticeable and really sad to watch.
Biden has always had an ability to stick his foot in his mouth with gaffes, misstatements, etc. but also had the ability to ad lib his way out of them with charm and humor. The charm and humor have given way to anger and impatience. Is his anger and impatience with himself because part of him is aware of what is going on but he can't respond in the way that he has and know he should?
As I said it is really sad to watch and you can see Jill and his handlers working to protect and shield him.
Simply saying diagnosing Dementia requires more than simple observation. Requires psychological testing. Personality disorders can also require psychological testing to identify. More often than not, it can be diagnosed from a series of interviews. We saw it everyday with Trump.
Last edited:
They both will run and both will have a huge amount of support. Your wishful thinking is that Trump won't run again and you won't have to go back to talking to your therapist about him every session.
One more question. You really haven't observed or noticed any significant deterioration in Joe Biden's mental acuity and/or faculties?
I had forgotten all about that 1972 idiot. He was giving Greed a run for his money as Pullman Village Idiot.
Unlike Greed he was very polite. He was just on a roll that Biden's cognitive problems were the result of his childhood struggles with stuttering...
Unlike Greed he was very polite. He was just on a roll that Biden's cognitive problems were the result of his childhood struggles with stuttering...
extradumbass is pissed because he's being called out thinking the rioters were trying to overthrow the government without using firearms.
Even the dumbest of dumbasses know no one could overthrow the government without a significant amount of people (more than a few hundred) and without the use of firearms.
An unarmed woman got shot in the back of the head. Did she drop her AK-47 and forget she had it?
extradumbass is dumber than the dumbest of dumbasses.
Oh... @extragreen...Why aren't you running your mouth over the FBI investigation saying there is no evidence that it was an insurrection? It's probably why no one was charged with or convicted of an insurrection, you liar.
Even the dumbest of dumbasses know no one could overthrow the government without a significant amount of people (more than a few hundred) and without the use of firearms.
An unarmed woman got shot in the back of the head. Did she drop her AK-47 and forget she had it?
extradumbass is dumber than the dumbest of dumbasses.
Oh... @extragreen...Why aren't you running your mouth over the FBI investigation saying there is no evidence that it was an insurrection? It's probably why no one was charged with or convicted of an insurrection, you liar.
Last edited:
There were firearms at the insurrection. You lying idiot.
It doesn't have to be successful to be an insurrection. You lying idiot.
Play stupid games. Win stupid prizes. You lying idiot.
That was NOT the finding of the FBI investigation. You lying idiot.
Watch the Georgia RICO trial when it starts.
No firearms were used, except for cops using them, dumbass.
It couldn't be successful becauseit wasn't an insurrection, dumbass. No one was charged with it. Damn, you're dumb.
Now it's a game? You're a dumbass.
No one was charged with committing an insurrection or inciting one.
It was an armed insurrection, including firearms. You lying idiot. You don't have to use a firearm to be charged with armed robbery.
It doesn't have to be successful. Retard.
Play stupid games. Win stupid prizes.
Neither were the other 8 insurrectionists removed or barred from office. You stupid lying idiot.
No one brandished a firearm, but for police, who happened to shoot and kill an unarmed woman.
For it to be successful or unsuccessful, it first has to be attempted, dumbass.
How do we know it wasn't an insurrection? No one was charged let alone convicted, dumbass. Damn, you're dumb.
No one played a game, except for Democrats and their bleaters, dumbass.
Key word, "insurrectionists," dumbass.
To be an insurrectionist, you have to commit an insurrection. No one was charged for an insurrection or being an insurrectionist.
They don't hand out fines for speeding to people who aren't speeding.
First they are charged, ticketed and if found guilty, they are fined.
The U.S. Supreme Court is about to teach you a lesson, dumbass.
Last edited:
It was an armed insurrection. You don't have to brandish a firearm to be charged with armed robbery.
We watched it happen. You lying idiot.
Not even one of the past 8 who were disqualified for insurrection were charged or convicted.
It was an insurrection.
You lost. And will lose yet again.
There was an insurrection and your orange jesus engaged in it.
Not even one of the past 8 who were disqualified for insurrection were charged or convicted.
It was an insurrection.
You're wrong if you think I believe your trumptard appointed judges can manage to do the right thing.
Dumbass....Rioters did NOT use firearms. Only the police did. Some possessed a firearm, but no one knew until after they were arrested. You claim "armed" because idiots used inanimate objects that they threw. You are trying to paint a picture of doom and gloom. You're a dumbass. Three people were charged with possession of a firearm onto Capitol grounds. THREE. They did NOT brandish nor did they use them. However, it is against the law to bring a firearm onto government property. Two others were charged with crimes related to firearms, but were not on Capitol grounds. Cops shot an unarmed woman in the back of the head, for crying out loud. I guarantee you, if anyone pulled out a firearm, they wouldn't be alive to have stood trial, dumbass. It was a riot. Period. Not near as bad as the Summer of 2020 riots.
We all watched a riot. We di NOT watch an insurrection. Answer the question, dumbass. Who has been charged with participating in an insurrection? Who has been convicted? If the crime happened, they would have been charged, you lying, numbskull.
Read it and weep, dumbass. It was not an insurrection, according to our governemnt, dumbass.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Words like sedition, treason, and insurrection have been used to describe what happened on Jan. 6, 2021.
Yet, none of the hundreds of people charged in connection with that day have been charged with those specific crimes.
“Those crimes are very, very hard to prove. They require basically an intent to try to frustrate or subvert the government,” said professor of constitutional law at the South Texas College of Law Josh Blackman.
Merriam-Webster defines insurrection as, “an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government.”
The dictionary also provides an ‘essential meaning’ of, “a usually violent attempt to take control of a government.”
Blackman said while the public can debate whether Jan. 6 meets the definition of an insurrection, the law is much more strict.
He said some of the people involved on Jan. 6 may see insurrection charges, but it will require federal prosecutors to prove they went to the Capitol building with the intent of overthrowing our government.
“I don’t think the government wants to bring a case unless they have a rock-solid argument in favor of insurrection,” said Blackman.
“A lot of people on Jan. 6 did not have that intent and probably didn’t even realize exactly what they were doing for a host of reasons,” said Blackman.
However, Blackman said he believes those who entered the Capitol that day are criminally liable, regardless of intent.
“If you smashed a window in the Capitol to break through, it doesn’t really matter what your intent was, you’re liable for a crime,” he said. “I think it’s safe to assume that if you are walking into the Capitol behind a mob of people, you probably weren’t allowed to be there.”
According to the Department of Justice, 725 people have been charged in connection with Jan 6; more than 225 have been charged with assaulting, resisting, or impeding officers; 640 have been charged with entering or remaining in a restricted area; 275 also face charges of obstructing, impeding or influencing an official proceeding.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In other words, you dumbass, no one was charged or found guilty of an insurrection, because there was no evidence, you lying dimwit.
Again, dumbass, this isn't a game of winners or losers. It simply wasn't an insurrection and federal prosecutors admit they didn't have enough evidence to prove it. We are all innocent until proven guilty of any crime, you moronic moron.
Now I understand, being the dumbass you are, will continue to call it an insurrection. That's your right. You're 100% wrong and you look like an idiot making that claim, but it's not against the law to be a dumbass, dumbass.
Prove it. We know you can't and will continue being a dumbass. If the federal government can't prove it, we know a dumbass like you can't, dumbass.
You can bring that up all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that there was no insurrection and the federal government agrees, regardless of what you say, dumbass.
The Snifftard, liberal, Trump-hating, judges are also about to teach you a lesson. They may hate Trump, but they aren't dumbasses like you.
It was an armed insurrection that included firearms.
The total number of people who carried firearms with them that day may not ever be fully accounted for because the majority of those involved in the siege weren’t arrested on-site but were tracked down by law enforcement days, weeks and months later. It was an armed insurrection.
Not even one of the past 8 who were disqualified for insurrection were charged or convicted.
It was an armed insurrection.
It was an armed insurrection.
For good reason, you stupid punk. At least 8 people have been convicted of seditious conspiracy.
They have. See above. moron
It was an armed insurrection.
You lying idiot.
No she didn't get shot in the back of the head. She was trying to breach a secure area. She got FAFOd. Play stupid games win stupid prizes.
Not an insurrection it was a mostly peaceful protest
You're a liar. They didn't go there to overthrow the government.
Three people. Three. Those are the facts. They didn't use firearms and wasn't charged for it either. They were charged with having a gun on government property.
The federal government makes the charges, not you. What you say means about as much as a dung beatle can say.
You are arguing against the facts the DOJ come up with. Your lies are based solely on hatred for Trump and that's just sad.
Dumbass.
You're a lying idiot.
It was an armed insurrection. It was incited by your orange jesus. It has been lawfully found that he engaged in an insurrection by a majority of both the Senate and the House, by the Jan 6 Committee, by a Colorado District Court, a Colorado Supreme Court, and the Maine Sec of State.
Those 3 were the only ones arrested on Jan 6. No one knows how many more had firearms.
You're a lying idiot.
That's your opinion. The facts of the case, disagree with you, so says the DOJ.
The DOJ and the facts are on my side and it's Pedo-Joe's DOJ. They SOOOO wanted it to be an insurrection.
You have a pipe dream. 😂
You say you detest lying but you lie more than anyone on this board. You are a very dishonest person.
Cause and effect. Something liberals and certain "libertarians" can't comprehend. Good read and spot on.
www.jpost.com
Antifa and the Capitol: A tale of two insurrections - opinion
The inexcusable actions of the Capitol rioters were the foreseeable extension of what came before.
www.jpost.com
