All of this is immaterial. Your first reply to this thread used a case where the crime involved an actual federal statute. Your second reply of "evidence" also involved crimes involving federal statute. You obviously were and are going down the road of a
criminal investigation. Your third reply involves possible corruption and blackmailing of a sitting public official...federal crimes.
Now you are seizing on the FBI doing what amounts to a background investigation. And had you bothered to read further than what you thought proved you right, you would have read:
"Here's another way to think about it. In doing background investigations, the FBI is acting as an agent of the White House. That's a separate role from its responsibility to investigate crimes."
" And in this case,
even assuming Ford's allegation to be true, there's no suggestion of a federal crime, quite apart from the statute of limitations issue. So the FBI has no independent authority to open a criminal investigation. Its only role here would be to re-open the Kavanaugh background investigation."
Are you now alleging someone lied to the FBI? The FBI has not questioned him on this matter, there is no lie. While your assumption the Dems want to play a gotcha game is quite possible, that is a very different game than what you have been arguing by using
criminal FBI investigations as your examples. In other words, you are full of shit and attempting to move the goalposts.
You are more dense than a neutron star.