ADVERTISEMENT

FBI Says No to Investigation

The accused is a sitting US Circuit Court judge. The FBI would absolutely be the lead investigatory agency in this matter.
Thank you counselor! are you another lib that took the LSAT? I realize dems think the FBI is freely available to engage in democrat political activities and corruption...but that is changing now. Trump is fixing this country and this judge is just another step!
 
As criminal matter, you are dead wrong. I'd suggest linking the statute you think applies or STFU.

This is taken directly from the FBI's web site:

The Bureau’s Public Corruption program focuses on:
  • Investigating violations of federal law by public officials at the federal, state, and local levels of government
Although this allegation does not fit the public corruption category, it is an alleged crime by a sitting US Official and would be treated in the same manner.

You think a state or local law enforcement agency is going to investigate an alleged crime by a sitting US Circuit Court judge? You are an idiot.
 
This is taken directly from the FBI's web site:

The Bureau’s Public Corruption program focuses on:
  • Investigating violations of federal law by public officials at the federal, state, and local levels of government
Although this allegation does not fit the public corruption category, it is an alleged crime by a sitting US Official and would be treated in the same manner.

You think a state or local law enforcement agency is going to investigate an alleged crime by a sitting US Circuit Court judge? You are an idiot.

You see that part I bolded? Tell us what federal law he is alleged to have violated.

You don't even know the difference in federal vs state law, but are trying to argue a matter directly involving the difference in the two...or you can't read well (which is plausible). Now who is the idiot?
 
You see that part I bolded? Tell us what federal law he is alleged to have violated.

You don't even know the difference in federal vs state law, but are trying to argue a matter directly involving the difference in the two...or you can't read well (which is plausible). Now who is the idiot?

I'll take this one. Easy, Cuntry is the idiot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raoul Duke MU

You do understand the FBI's involvement is because these people held political office at the time the alleged offenses occurred, thereby making the alleged conduct potential public corruption and/or civil rights violations, right?

Which is wholly different from the Kavanaugh thing.

The FBI does, however, perform the background review for SCOTUS nominees, meaning they could look into the allegations for this purpose, but not for the purpose of bringing federal criminal charges. Any potential criminal charges would fall on State or local officials and law enforcement.

You continue to prove, over and over, you are the most ignorant person that posts here. How's the sciatica holding up, grandpa?
 
You see that part I bolded? Tell us what federal law he is alleged to have violated.

You don't even know the difference in federal vs state law, but are trying to argue a matter directly involving the difference in the two...or you can't read well (which is plausible). Now who is the idiot?


But but but but but

LMAO!
 
"The FBI could certainly investigate Ford's claim."

Thanks!

Let me break it down further for you.

Lying to the FBI is a crime. The victim/accuser/female welcomes an investigation by the FBI. The accused, the POTUS and the witness do NOT want the FBI to investigate. Lying to the FBI is a crime.

Get it now?

All of this is immaterial. Your first reply to this thread used a case where the crime involved an actual federal statute. Your second reply of "evidence" also involved crimes involving federal statute. You obviously were and are going down the road of a criminal investigation. Your third reply involves possible corruption and blackmailing of a sitting public official...federal crimes.

Now you are seizing on the FBI doing what amounts to a background investigation. And had you bothered to read further than what you thought proved you right, you would have read:

"Here's another way to think about it. In doing background investigations, the FBI is acting as an agent of the White House. That's a separate role from its responsibility to investigate crimes."

" And in this case, even assuming Ford's allegation to be true, there's no suggestion of a federal crime, quite apart from the statute of limitations issue. So the FBI has no independent authority to open a criminal investigation. Its only role here would be to re-open the Kavanaugh background investigation."

Are you now alleging someone lied to the FBI? The FBI has not questioned him on this matter, there is no lie. While your assumption the Dems want to play a gotcha game is quite possible, that is a very different game than what you have been arguing by using criminal FBI investigations as your examples. In other words, you are full of shit and attempting to move the goalposts.

You are more dense than a neutron star.
 
All of this is immaterial. Your first reply to this thread used a case where the crime involved an actual federal statute. Your second reply of "evidence" also involved crimes involving federal statute. You obviously were and are going down the road of a criminal investigation. Your third reply involves possible corruption and blackmailing of a sitting public official...federal crimes.

Now you are seizing on the FBI doing what amounts to a background investigation. And had you bothered to read further than what you thought proved you right, you would have read:

"Here's another way to think about it. In doing background investigations, the FBI is acting as an agent of the White House. That's a separate role from its responsibility to investigate crimes."

" And in this case, even assuming Ford's allegation to be true, there's no suggestion of a federal crime, quite apart from the statute of limitations issue. So the FBI has no independent authority to open a criminal investigation. Its only role here would be to re-open the Kavanaugh background investigation."

Are you now alleging someone lied to the FBI? The FBI has not questioned him on this matter, there is no lie. While your assumption the Dems want to play a gotcha game is quite possible, that is a very different game than what you have been arguing by using criminal FBI investigations as your examples. In other words, you are full of shit and attempting to move the goalposts.

You are more dense than a neutron star.

I quoted your own source.

Thanks again!

"The FBI could certainly investigate Ford's claim."
 
You're bad for the forum, and totally ruin it.


You are the biggest pussy I have ever seen.

143-61067-babycrt-1412618128.jpg
 
You are the biggest pussy I have ever seen.
No, a pussy is someone like yourself. You know the kind, the braggart who posts on the internet about being smarter than everyone else, can beat everybody else's ass, makes more money than everybody else, gets more pvssy than everybody else, tells everybody else they're stupid. Who does that remind you of, asshole?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
I quoted your own source.

You did, as it explained the FBI conducts a background check on all appointees. The FBI has already completed a background check on Kavanaugh. However, you could have mentioned background checks earlier, but you kept linking to criminal cases. It's obvious you are referring to a criminal investigation, which they cannot do in the case; otherwise you are saying the FBI should do something they already have done, which makes zero sense.

Why be so hardheaded when you know you are wrong? It is that hard to use some goddamn logic?
 
No, a pussy is someone like yourself. You know the kind, the braggart who posts on the internet about being smarter than everyone else, can beat everybody else's ass, makes more money than everybody else, gets more pvssy than everybody else, tells everybody else they're stupid. Who does that remind you of, asshole?

Yags?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
I'm still trying to understand how the FBI would even investigate this. Something tells me democrats fully understand how ridiculous it is to even suggest it but they're beyond desperate at this point.
 
I'm still trying to understand how the FBI would even investigate this. Something tells me democrats fully understand how ridiculous it is to even suggest it but they're beyond desperate at this point.

Yeah, there is no precedent for this, right?

Like Bush directed in 1991?

“In 1991, when Hill’s allegations were made public, the FBI became involved at the direction of the White House.”
 
Yeah, there is no precedent for this, right?

Like Bush directed in 1991?

“In 1991, when Hill’s allegations were made public, the FBI became involved at the direction of the White House.”
Big difference between the two scenarios. It's adorable you can't tell the difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
Yeah, there is no precedent for this, right?

Like Bush directed in 1991?

“In 1991, when Hill’s allegations were made public, the FBI became involved at the direction of the White House.”
Are you seriously that dense that you can’t see how different that situation is from this one? Here let me break it down for you. One allegedly happened while they were teenagers at a party. The other allegedly happened while the parties involved were employed by the federal government. See the difference?!?!
 
Are you seriously that dense that you can’t see how different that situation is from this one? Here let me break it down for you. One allegedly happened while they were teenagers at a party. The other allegedly happened while the parties involved were employed by the federal government. See the difference?!?!

He clearly doesn't.
 
30 some years ago , that's all they come up with. Touchdown trump. Game over .Spike the ball. The one lady that sits on the court, the woman who really had helped women and gays claimed Abraham Lincoln smacked her on the butt. Liberals chanting in dc .Dig him out .Dig him up . Again
 
30 some years ago , that's all they come up with. Touchdown trump. Game over .Spike the ball. The one lady that sits on the court, the woman who really had helped women and gays claimed Abraham Lincoln smacked her on the butt. Liberals chanting in dc .Dig him out .Dig him up . Again
giphy.gif
 
No, a pussy is someone like yourself. You know the kind, the braggart who posts on the internet about being smarter than everyone else, can beat everybody else's ass, makes more money than everybody else, gets more pvssy than everybody else, tells everybody else they're stupid. Who does that remind you of, asshole?

Christoph-Waltz-Ta-Da-GIF.gif
 
Fords lawyer sent a list of demands to judiciary committee. Those include Kavanaugh testifying first among other things. That should absolutely be a nonstarter
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThunderCat98
Fords lawyer sent a list of demands to judiciary committee. Those include Kavanaugh testifying first among other things. That should absolutely be a nonstarter

If he didn’t do it and isn’t afraid of perjuring himself, he should have no problem testifying first.

The thing is, he told a few whoppers during his earlier testimony and Leahy knows it.
 
GOP has offered to let her testify on Wednesday instead of Monday. Now apparently her lawyers are saying that can’t happen because Dr Ford doesn’t want to fly. This is a damn joke especially since there was an offer for senate staffer to fly to California
 
The united states gov on hold because of this woman. I bet it was consensual. Picture I saw she was on top. Can't rape the willing. Lol
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT