So you have no number or measurable expectations.
Is there such a thing? Seems like numbers don't matter at times and this measurement is subjective.
If MU isn't winning the conference then should 8-10 wins a season suffice?
But even those are contested because, "this conference sucks."
Even when MU beat WKU, regardless of how, it wasn't that MU won at all.
More effort has been put into discussing that MU should have lost that game than just seeing that winning was the result.
Goddamn Sam's rants on wvu did have me thinking of how opposite the fanbases are...and which one really is beneficial for a program.
On one end you have a bunch of dumbass hilljack morons who never took academics seriously attending wvu...along with in-state WV residents.
But these idiots have been force fed to support literally anything they can find.
"wvu didn't nearly lose to an FCS team...dem mountainairs beat a very good FCS team!!"
"wvu got smoked by LSU on their own turf on primetime football" "No, look at the offensive yards they put up!!! wvu's offense is insanely good!!"
"Look, I'm optimistic...wvu's is a 9.5% percent chance to beat Baylor!!! Upset city for dem bearz!"
Then you have somewhat level headed WV residents who actually read into their team...albeit, a little too much...because they look into literally every detail of the team to find something to worry about...combined that with a HC they don't like and its poison for fandom.
"MU won 10 games this season! Woohoo!"
"Uhm...those wins were against a schedule ranked in the lower quadrant of the FBS...we really didn't beat anyone."
MU wins CUSA in 2014...
"Well, if you look at the wins and losses of the teams MU played and the ones prior to the departure, MU really isn't that good ya know."
"I can't believe how far MU has fallen...that we could have lost to WKU, and 1st in the east, if the refs paid better attention to MU's mistakes."
It'd be nice to be in the middle of those two fan perspectives.
Won't happen though.