ADVERTISEMENT

ha ha Hillary's education scandal!

ohio herd

ohio herd

Platinum Buffalo
Gold Member
Aug 28, 2012
9,682
5,779
113
People who live in glass houses should not throw stones I say! Her attempt to attack Trump over his Trump U is a ploy to divert from her own bigger fleecing of poor students in Latin America. I guess it's alright DHERD since she is a Democrat right?

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/06/heres-hillary-university-scandal-no-one-media-talking/

Hillary University: Bill Clinton Bagged $16.46 Million from For-Profit College as State Dept. Funneled $55 Million Back

Clinton is crooked !

By the way Trump University has a 98% approval rating by the students who went there

http://www.98percentapproval.com/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: andy4theherd
The scams they manage through their foundation are endless. Her SOS position helped to hide the international fraud and $$ laundering. These are why she is hiding her emails.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio herd
ohio herd said:
People who live in glass houses should not throw stones I say! Her attempt to attack Trump over his Trump U is a ploy to divert from her own bigger fleecing of poor students in Latin America.
Click to expand...
Politicians use diversion tactics? In other news, college students like to drink alcohol and have sex.
 
ohio herd said:
yes it is true she funneled money into their foundation and yes she is a crook. Why defend her you are voting for Bernie anyway.
Click to expand...

Provide credible links showing hillary is a crook.
Provide credible links showing trump u has a 98% favorabiltiy rating.
No, Breitbart is not a credible link.
 
Are you disputing that Bill Clinton got $16MM from the school, that the state department pumped $55MM in to it, or that the owner of the school was a Clinton foundation donor?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio herd
I was going to look up links to verify, but it says right in the story that Bloomberg already did that. Do you not trust Bloomberg either?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio herd
Rock98Dog said:
Are you disputing that Bill Clinton got $16MM from the school, that the state department pumped $55MM in to it, or that the owner of the school was a Clinton foundation donor?
Click to expand...

I couldn't find a reputable source for the "clinton university" data.

I am disputing that hillary is a criminal.

I am disputing that trump u has a 98% favorabliity rating.
 
extragreen said:
Provide credible links showing hillary is a crook.
Provide credible links showing trump u has a 98% favorabiltiy rating.
No, Breitbart is not a credible link.
Click to expand...
sorry EG we have been down this road before. None of us left you in charge so you don't get to decide what is a credible link. ( says the guy who references Snopes). You think all you have to do is say it is a bad source and the truth will go away. Not working Bloomberg said it so hows that?
 
extragreen said:
I couldn't find a reputable source for the "clinton university" data.

I am disputing that hillary is a criminal.

I am disputing that trump u has a 98% favorabliity rating.
Click to expand...
As the Washington Post reports, “Laureate has stirred controversy throughout Latin America, where it derives two-thirds of its revenue.” During Bill Clinton’s tenure as Laureate’s chancellor, the school spent over $200 million a year on aggressive telemarketing, flashy Internet banner ads, and billboards designed to lure often unprepared students from impoverished countries to enroll in its for-profit classes. The goal: get as many students, regardless of skill level, signed up and paying tuition.
 
ohio herd said:
sorry EG we have been down this road before. None of us left you in charge so you don't get to decide what is a credible link. ( says the guy who references Snopes). You think all you have to do is say it is a bad source and the truth will go away. Not working Bloomberg said it so hows that?
Click to expand...

Neither do you. Which is why I said it's not true. You hack site says Bill Clinton was FORCED to resign. Let's have a credible link to that.
 
extragreen said:
Neither do you. Which is why I said it's not true. You hack site says Bill Clinton was FORCED to resign. Let's have a credible link to that.
Click to expand...
Dont try to change the subject she did all that was listed in the article. PS I like my sources yours are nothing but bush league hows that?
 
ohio herd said:
Dont try to change the subject she did all that was listed in the article. PS I like my sources yours are nothing but bush league hows that?
Click to expand...

No problem. Get used to me telling you it's not true, or asking for credible links. And it's easy to see why you wouldn't appreciate any fact checking site.
 
extragreen said:
No problem. Get used to me telling you it's not true, or asking for credible links. And it's easy to see why you wouldn't appreciate any fact checking site.
Click to expand...

dalai lama 2--You're one ignorant individual. Do you get help in wiping your ass after a dump? I bet so.
 
" Trump is going to win this election."

OHIO HERD - YOUR A VERY FUNNY GUY - IN A STRANGE SORT OF WAY.

http://www.hark.com/clips/syffmcgbgd-hysterical-laugh

th
 
If someone can't connect the very obvious dots with the Clintons using their political influence to make millions from huge international corporations, they're dumb. According to Bernie Sanders, anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: andy4theherd and ohio herd
extragreen said:
What is it that you call people who do things like this that you agree with? Oh yeah, patriots.
Click to expand...


That is not a patriot. Those people are thugs. Difference. I would not want anyone doing this at a Crooked Hillary or Bernie rally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio herd
i am herdman said:
That is not a patriot. Those people are thugs. Difference. I would not want anyone doing this at a Crooked Hillary or Bernie rally.
Click to expand...

You said nothing as trumpenstein instigated violence at his rallies. trump is a thug. And you're an idiot.
 
extragreen said:
Let's cut through it. Have either of the clintons been found guilty in a court of law?
Click to expand...

Yeah, because conviction is an accurate litmus test for determining whether or not someone is engaged in criminal activity.

Hey, eg, what about all those investment bankers and wall street types that continue to fleece the system? Those guys on the up-and-up, or are they criminal assholes that haven't been caught or charged?
 
ThunderCat98 said:
Yeah, because conviction is an accurate litmus test for determining whether or not someone is engaged in criminal activity.

Hey, eg, what about all those investment bankers and wall street types that continue to fleece the system? Those guys on the up-and-up, or are they criminal assholes that haven't been caught or charged?
Click to expand...

So, people are guilty because you say so?

I can't call the financial institutions criminal until they've been convicted. I can say I fully believe them to be very unethical.
 
extragreen said:
So, people are guilty because you say so?

I can't call the financial institutions criminal until they've been convicted. I can say I fully believe them to be very unethical.
Click to expand...
Extra never drives over the speed limit
 
Looks like you cons have run out of content (not that you ever had any).
 
hard to hold a discussion when the Libs IQ is so low they can never understand the point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

andy4theherd

Remember all the posts from Dtard and EG about Trump U?

Replies
2
Views
239
Pullman Square - Non Sports Talk
herdfan06
H
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back