Your point is to post false information from conspiracy theory sources, and have everyone believe it.
ha ha Hillary's education scandal!
- Thread starter ohio herd
- Start date
Your point is to post false information from conspiracy theory sources, and have everyone believe it.
once again anytime someone posts the truth you immediately try to dismiss it. Newsflash there is a reason why liberal news outlets are taking a beating and conservative ones are taking prisoners. People have figured out that libs can't be trusted! To be honest, I could care less what you think of my sources EG. They are way more reliable than yours.
Yeah thegatewaypundit is a fantastic source if you like the national enquirer........http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...beating-husband-bill-clinton-violent-assault/
and 98percentapproval.com is a website created by trumps attorneys.
Yeah your sources are top notch.
Far as I know, yeah. Skip that and let's hear about the wrong doing. And don't start with "he was forced to resign from his position" hogwash.
Hate to burst your bubble but the man behind the story was a Secret Service agent who claims he saw these actions. Either he lied or he told the truth. Please disprove what Trumps attorneys claims.Please dis prove the Clintons part in milking people for money
currently the #1 bestseller on Amazon... and doesn't come out until June 28th..... beating out the new Harry Potter book.............................
http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/books/ref=sv_b_2
http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/books/ref=sv_b_2
Okay, here's how it worked.
Douglas Becker is the cofounder of Laureate. He also has a sister organization, the International Youth Foundation (IYF). The IYF has received funding from the state department for a long time, going back to the end of Clinton's presidency and continuing through Bush and Obama. Where it gets interesting is that when Hillary became SOS, and Bill was hired by the company, the state department significantly increased their funding of the IYF. In 2010, after Bill was appointed honorary chancellor, Hillary had the IYF added to the State Department Global Partnership. That year US government funds jumped to $23MM, out of $28MM in total revenue for the organization.
Douglas Becker is the cofounder of Laureate. He also has a sister organization, the International Youth Foundation (IYF). The IYF has received funding from the state department for a long time, going back to the end of Clinton's presidency and continuing through Bush and Obama. Where it gets interesting is that when Hillary became SOS, and Bill was hired by the company, the state department significantly increased their funding of the IYF. In 2010, after Bill was appointed honorary chancellor, Hillary had the IYF added to the State Department Global Partnership. That year US government funds jumped to $23MM, out of $28MM in total revenue for the organization.
Sure thing on that secret service agent. Bwaahaha
As for the 98%........In a sworn deposition, director of operations Mark Covais conceded that nearly a third of students who took three-day seminars from Trump’s instructors demanded and received refunds before Trump University changed its policy.
The refund rate for the $34,995 program, which according to the lawsuits was tougher on giving money back, was 16%.
If at least 31% of one group and 16% of the other were so instantly dissatisfied that they immediately demanded refunds, how could 98% have been satisfied?
http://time.com/4246394/donald-trump-university-98-percent-approval-lawsuit/
"Please dis prove the Clintons part in milking people for money." You claimed it, you prove it.
"The Clinton campaign disputed Schweizer’s characterization. "This is yet another false allegation in a book that is fast being debunked," said Brian Fallon, a campaign spokesman. "The International Youth Foundation was funded by the Bush administration, well before Hillary Clinton became Secretary of State. In fact, the group's USAID funding actually went down in the year that she arrived at the State Department, not up."
A Bloomberg examination of IYF’s public filings show that in 2009, the year before Bill Clinton joined Laureate, the nonprofit received 11 grants worth $9 million from the State Department or the affiliated USAID. In 2010, the group received 14 grants worth $15.1 million. In 2011, 13 grants added up to $14.6 million. The following year, those numbers jumped: IYF received 21 grants worth $25.5 million, including a direct grant from the State Department."
It doesn't surprise me that funding went up as the economy began to improve. Peter Schweizer (the author of these allegations) himself admitted that he had no “‘direct evidence’ of any impropriety.Furthermore, as could be expected, Schweizer is a GOP political operative and is a former adviser to Sarah Palin. Just another quasi benghazi attempt to derail a clinton run at the presidency.
This post is about the cheating Clintons and how they milked innocent kids out of their milk money. Stay on point EG you are just treading water. The SS Clinton is taking on water and is about to sink!
This thread is about the cheating clintons, yeah...............in your original post in this thread:
"By the way Trump University has a 98% approval rating by the students who went there "
This is the third book written by a former SS agent or White House staffer and all 3 claim the very same things. Maybe it's a vast Secret Service conspiracy.
Thank you for reinforcing my point. I already said that IYF was funded under Bush, but what you laid out shows that funding increased when the Clintons got involved, increasing about 75% from 2010 to 2014 (2014 budget is done in 2013 and expended in 2014) and the funding involved a direct grant from the State Department, something that had not occurred before. In other words, Hillary funneled more money to the organization and the Clinton's got their cut through Bill's $3MM+ a year salary as honorary chancellor.
Boom! Here you go Dherd and EG
STATEMENT REGARDING TRUMP UNIVERSITY
It is unfortunate that my comments have been misconstrued as a categorical attack against people of Mexican heritage. I am friends with and employ thousands of people of Mexican and Hispanic descent. The American justice system relies on fair and impartial judges. All judges should be held to that standard. I do not feel that one’s heritage makes them incapable of being impartial, but, based on the rulings that I have received in the Trump University civil case, I feel justified in questioning whether I am receiving a fair trial.
Over the past few weeks, I have watched as the media has reported one inaccuracy after another concerning the ongoing litigation involving Trump University. There are several important facts the public should know and that the media has failed to report.
Throughout the litigation my attorneys have continually demonstrated that students who participated in Trump University were provided a substantive, valuable education based upon a curriculum developed by professors from Northwestern University, Columbia Business School, Stanford University and other respected institutions. And, the response from students was overwhelming. Over a five year period, more than 10,000 paying students filled out surveys giving the courses high marks and expressing their overwhelming satisfaction with Trump University’s programs. For example:
Former student Tarla Makaeff, the original plaintiff in the litigation, not only completed multiple surveys rating Trump University’s three-day seminar “excellent” in every category, but also praised Trump University’s mentorship program in a glowing 5 plus minute video testimonial. When asked “how could Trump University help to meet [her] goals”, she simply stated “[c]ontinue to offer great classes.” Once the plaintiffs’ lawyers realized how disastrous a witness she was, they asked to have her removed from the case. Over my lawyers’ objections, the judge granted the plaintiffs’ motion, but allowed the case to continue.
Art Cohen, a lead plaintiffs in the litigation, completed a survey in which he not only rated Trump University’s three-day seminar “excellent” in virtually every category, but went so far as to indicate that he would “attend another Trump University seminar” and even “recommend Trump University seminars to a friend.” When asked how Trump University could improve the seminar, Mr. Cohen’s only suggestion was to “[h]ave lunch sandwiches brought in” and make the lunch break 45 minutes.
Former student Bob Giullo, who has been critical of Trump University in numerous interviews and negative advertisements from my political opponents, also expressed his satisfaction, rating Trump University’s programs “excellent” in every category. When asked how Trump University could improve its programs, Mr. Giullo simply asked that students be provided “more comfortable chairs.”
Indeed, these are just a few of literally thousands of positive surveys, all of which can be viewed online at www.98percentapproval.com.
For those students who decided that Trump University’s programs were not for them, the company had a generous refund policy, offering a full refund to any student who asked for their money back within 3 days of signing up for a program or by the end of the first day of any multi-day program, whichever came later.
Normally, legal issues in a civil case would be heard in a neutral environment. However, given my unique circumstances as nominee of the Republican Party and the core issues of my campaign that focus on illegal immigration, jobs and unfair trade, I have concerns as to my ability to receive a fair trial.
I am fighting hard to bring jobs back to the United States. Many companies – like Ford, General Motors, Nabisco, Carrier – are moving production to Mexico. Drugs and illegal immigrants are also pouring across our border. This is bad for all Americans, regardless of their heritage.
Due to what I believe are unfair and mistaken rulings in this case and the Judge’s reported associations with certain professional organizations, questions were raised regarding the Obama appointed Judge’s impartiality. It is a fair question. I hope it is not the case.
While this lawsuit should have been dismissed, it is now scheduled for trial in November. I do not intend to comment on this matter any further. With all of the thousands of people who have given the courses such high marks and accolades, we will win this case!
Donald J. Trump
Nothing to see time to move on boys!
STATEMENT REGARDING TRUMP UNIVERSITY
It is unfortunate that my comments have been misconstrued as a categorical attack against people of Mexican heritage. I am friends with and employ thousands of people of Mexican and Hispanic descent. The American justice system relies on fair and impartial judges. All judges should be held to that standard. I do not feel that one’s heritage makes them incapable of being impartial, but, based on the rulings that I have received in the Trump University civil case, I feel justified in questioning whether I am receiving a fair trial.
Over the past few weeks, I have watched as the media has reported one inaccuracy after another concerning the ongoing litigation involving Trump University. There are several important facts the public should know and that the media has failed to report.
Throughout the litigation my attorneys have continually demonstrated that students who participated in Trump University were provided a substantive, valuable education based upon a curriculum developed by professors from Northwestern University, Columbia Business School, Stanford University and other respected institutions. And, the response from students was overwhelming. Over a five year period, more than 10,000 paying students filled out surveys giving the courses high marks and expressing their overwhelming satisfaction with Trump University’s programs. For example:
Former student Tarla Makaeff, the original plaintiff in the litigation, not only completed multiple surveys rating Trump University’s three-day seminar “excellent” in every category, but also praised Trump University’s mentorship program in a glowing 5 plus minute video testimonial. When asked “how could Trump University help to meet [her] goals”, she simply stated “[c]ontinue to offer great classes.” Once the plaintiffs’ lawyers realized how disastrous a witness she was, they asked to have her removed from the case. Over my lawyers’ objections, the judge granted the plaintiffs’ motion, but allowed the case to continue.
Art Cohen, a lead plaintiffs in the litigation, completed a survey in which he not only rated Trump University’s three-day seminar “excellent” in virtually every category, but went so far as to indicate that he would “attend another Trump University seminar” and even “recommend Trump University seminars to a friend.” When asked how Trump University could improve the seminar, Mr. Cohen’s only suggestion was to “[h]ave lunch sandwiches brought in” and make the lunch break 45 minutes.
Former student Bob Giullo, who has been critical of Trump University in numerous interviews and negative advertisements from my political opponents, also expressed his satisfaction, rating Trump University’s programs “excellent” in every category. When asked how Trump University could improve its programs, Mr. Giullo simply asked that students be provided “more comfortable chairs.”
Indeed, these are just a few of literally thousands of positive surveys, all of which can be viewed online at www.98percentapproval.com.
For those students who decided that Trump University’s programs were not for them, the company had a generous refund policy, offering a full refund to any student who asked for their money back within 3 days of signing up for a program or by the end of the first day of any multi-day program, whichever came later.
Normally, legal issues in a civil case would be heard in a neutral environment. However, given my unique circumstances as nominee of the Republican Party and the core issues of my campaign that focus on illegal immigration, jobs and unfair trade, I have concerns as to my ability to receive a fair trial.
I am fighting hard to bring jobs back to the United States. Many companies – like Ford, General Motors, Nabisco, Carrier – are moving production to Mexico. Drugs and illegal immigrants are also pouring across our border. This is bad for all Americans, regardless of their heritage.
Due to what I believe are unfair and mistaken rulings in this case and the Judge’s reported associations with certain professional organizations, questions were raised regarding the Obama appointed Judge’s impartiality. It is a fair question. I hope it is not the case.
While this lawsuit should have been dismissed, it is now scheduled for trial in November. I do not intend to comment on this matter any further. With all of the thousands of people who have given the courses such high marks and accolades, we will win this case!
Donald J. Trump
Nothing to see time to move on boys!
Yeah, because the numbers don't include those who weren't aware that trump changed policy that you only had 3 days to request a refund.
maybe he can google it wait Google is on Hillarys team
https://www.rt.com/usa/345749-assange-us-google-clinton/
https://www.rt.com/usa/345749-assange-us-google-clinton/
No, because it lacks the key element. It's not about helping out a company or cause you are supportive of, it's about the self enrichment created by the assignment of those funds. If the company had not hired Bill as an apparent precursor to the increased funding, and the quid pro quo with the company donating back to the Clinton Foundation had not occurred, then your Bush Haliburton comment would be appropriate.
The Bush family was already wealthy. The Clintons were not and decided to use government dollars to build their wealth.
I've never seen conservatives gnash their teeth so much over a link to a source.
http://time.com/4246394/donald-trump-university-98-percent-approval-lawsuit/
http://time.com/4246394/donald-trump-university-98-percent-approval-lawsuit/
Wow. It's amazing how terrible you are in your picks of sources. rt.com = russian government funded. You guys really are putin lovers. And one of the sources in the article.....Julian Assange. Far out.
No, what it's about is you believe it's worse for the clintons to make money from a college than it is for halliburton to make money from a unnecessary war. How many people killed due to the clinton association with Laureate compared to how many killed due to halliburtons association with bush and cheny?
Is it true? Once again EG every time you hear the truth you attack the source - priceless!
Haliburton is not running for President of the United States. How many people were killed because of Trumps University EG? See 2 can play that game.
Is it true? I don't know. You don't know. But you believe it. And you believe it because you went to a website funded by the russian government and took the word of a man that is wanted by the U S on charges of espionage, conspiracy, theft of government property and computer fraud in the leaking of 250,000 classified military and diplomatic documents. All the while you gnash your teeth because of a private server that has not, as far as we know, been compromised.
she broke the law. Don't worry nothing will happen to her. Maybe the guy who is wanted by us is telling the truth. You do realize the Govt has covered up 1 or 2 things over the years? Try the assassination of JFK for starters.
