House Democrats will subpoena Mueller if report is not made public, Schiff says

[dherd]

WHY WOULD CROOKED DONALD TRUMP AND HIS AG BITCHES NOT WANT IT RELEASED IF THEY DID NOTHING WRONG THERE IS NOTHING TO HIDE.

Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) said Sunday that House Democrats will subpoena special counsel Robert S. Mueller III to testify before Congress if his report on Russian interference in the 2016 campaign is not made public.

Schiff, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said on ABC News’s “This Week” that Democrats will also subpoena Mueller’s report and are prepared to go to court against the CROOKED DONALD TRUMP administration.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...07b06d0257b_story.html?utm_term=.e5bcc206a55c

 

[19MU88]

That should finish him off

 

[ThunderCat98]

You've got him now?

 

[dherd]

"IF THEY HAVE THE GOODS ON YOU JUST SAY SOMETHING STUPID - MY FOLLOWERS ARE DUMB AS DIRT - THEY PROVE IT EVERY DAY."
CROOKED DONALD TRUMP 4/1/16

http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/do...national-security-adviser-michael-flynn/3336/

 

[Marc22]

WHY WOULD CROOKED DONALD TRUMP AND HIS AG BITCHES NOT WANT IT RELEASED IF THEY DID NOTHING WRONG THERE IS NOTHING TO HIDE.

Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) said Sunday that House Democrats will subpoena special counsel Robert S. Mueller III to testify before Congress if his report on Russian interference in the 2016 campaign is not made public.

Schiff, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said on ABC News’s “This Week” that Democrats will also subpoena Mueller’s report and are prepared to go to court against the CROOKED DONALD TRUMP administration.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...07b06d0257b_story.html?utm_term=.e5bcc206a55c

You’ve got him now!

 

[dherd]

PALM BEACH, Fla. (AP) — CROOKED DONALD TRUMP said he received a $17 million insurance payment in 2005 for hurricane damage to Mar-a-Lago, his private club in Palm Beach, but The Associated Press found little evidence of such large-scale damage.

Two years after a series of storms, the real estate tycoon said he didn’t know how much had been spent on repairs but acknowledged he pocketed some of the money. Trump transferred funds into his personal accounts, saying that under the terms of his policy, “you didn’t have to reinvest it.”

CROOKED DONALD TRUMP description of extensive damage does not match those of Mar-a-Lago members and even Trump loyalists. In an interview about the estate’s history, Trump’s longtime former butler, Anthony Senecal, recalled no catastrophic damage. He said Hurricane Wilma, the last of a string of storms that barreled through in 2004 and 2005, flattened trees behind Mar-a-Lago, but the house itself only lost some roof tiles.

“That house has never been seriously damaged,” said Senecal, discussing Mar-a-Lago’s luck with hurricanes. “I was there for all of them.”

 

[Bankerreturns]

That should get him impeached. You got him now.

 

[herdfan06]

That should finish him off

I am pretty sure Stormy Daniels already did...

 

[Herdfaninnoke]

Is this the same Schiff that was recorded colluding with a supposed Russian intelligence official? The one that turned out to be a radio host.

 

[extragreen]

The call was first reported in The Atlantic's Jan/Feb 2018 issue, where a spokesman for Schiff said: "Before agreeing to take the call, and immediately following it, the committee informed appropriate law-enforcement and security personnel of the conversation, and of our belief that it was probably bogus."
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...omise_him_naked_photos_of_trump_from_fsb.html

 

[Herdfaninnoke]

And your point is? Listen to the interview and the dumbass you all are following. Hilarious!!

 

[19MU88]

The call was first reported in The Atlantic's Jan/Feb 2018 issue, where a spokesman for Schiff said: "Before agreeing to take the call, and immediately following it, the committee informed appropriate law-enforcement and security personnel of the conversation, and of our belief that it was probably bogus."
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...omise_him_naked_photos_of_trump_from_fsb.html

Oh that clears it up moron

 

[extragreen]

And your point is? Listen to the interview and the dumbass you all are following. Hilarious!!

Oh that clears it up moron

It's not collusion, morons, if the communication is done overtly and legally. So,yeah, that should clear it up.

 

[herd66]

Thank God almost 70% of the people of WV dis agree with most of you.Go ahead and kill babies ,marry homos and lesbians.Do not believe in Christ and agree with the Socialist Demos and have fun until you die .

 

[countryroads89]

Thank God almost 70% of the people of WV dis agree with most of you.Go ahead and kill babies ,marry homos and lesbians.Do not believe in Christ and agree with the Socialist Demos and have fun until you die .

Hello! It's 2019, dumbass.

 

[herd66]

Why did you post a picture of yourself?

 

[herdfan429]

It's not collusion, morons, if the communication is done overtly and legally. So,yeah, that should clear it up.

So how were the trump meetings illegal? Was Hillary covertly paying for her oppo research to a foreign nation then collusion?

 

[extragreen]

Thank God almost 70% of the people of WV dis agree with most of you

That "almost 70%" voted for a man who is a pathological liar, thrice married wife cheater (all 3 of them), totally inexperienced, Constitutionally illiterate, who won't know Jesus until he meets him. Now, go ahead and thank God for cheetos.

 

[extragreen]

So how were the trump meetings illegal?

I didn't say they were.

Was Hillary covertly paying for her oppo research to a foreign nation then collusion?

Hillary didn't pay a foreign nation for opposition research as far as I know. She paid the law firm Perkins Coie, who retained Fusion GPS after they quit doing research against cheetos after initially being funded by a conservative political website ( The Washington Free Beacon).

 

[countryroads89]

So how were the trump meetings illegal?

52 USC 30121

(a) ProhibitionIt shall be unlawful for—
foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make—
(A)
a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;
(B)
a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or
(C)
an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or
(2)
a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.
foreign national” means—
(1)
a foreign principal, as such term is defined by section 611(b) of title 22, except that the term “foreign national” shall not include any individual who is a citizen of the United States; or
(2)
an individual who is not a citizen of the United States or a national of the United States (as defined in section 1101(a)(22) of title 8) and who is not lawfully admitted for permanent residence, as defined by section 1101(a)(20) of title 8.

In layman's terms - it is unlawful to accept a contribution (any thing of value) from a foreign national (an individual who is not a citizen of the United States) in connection with a federal election.

 

[HerdBuckeye]

Hello! It's 2019, dumbass.

You guys elected this blind retard. Pretty much summarizes the right of this board.

 

[herdfan429]

I didn't say they were.



Hillary didn't pay a foreign nation for opposition research as far as I know. She paid the law firm Perkins Coie, who retained Fusion GPS after they quit doing research against cheetos after initially being funded by a conservative political website ( The Washington Free Beacon).

Yeah they didn’t continue the free beacons oppo research so that’s a non argument. You mean to tell me the Hillary campaign had NO idea what Perkins Coie was doing?

52 USC 30121

(a) ProhibitionIt shall be unlawful for—
foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make—
(A)
a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;
(B)
a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or
(C)
an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or
(2)
a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.
foreign national” means—
(1)
a foreign principal, as such term is defined by section 611(b) of title 22, except that the term “foreign national” shall not include any individual who is a citizen of the United States; or
(2)
an individual who is not a citizen of the United States or a national of the United States (as defined in section 1101(a)(22) of title 8) and who is not lawfully admitted for permanent residence, as defined by section 1101(a)(20) of title 8.

In layman's terms - it is unlawful to accept a contribution (any thing of value) from a foreign national (an individual who is not a citizen of the United States) in connection with a federal election.

So you’re saying Hillary using foreign sources was illegal?

 

[countryroads89]

So you’re saying Hillary using foreign sources was illegal?

Hillary met with Russians? Hillary shared election-related data with Russians?

What part of the statute is too difficult for you to understand?

 

[extragreen]

You mean to tell me the Hillary campaign had NO idea what Perkins Coie was doing?

As far as I can tell, that's irrelevant.^^^

The difference is that the Hillary campaign was paying to have the opposition research done, which is legal as long as it's paid for with legally raised campaign contributions. With trump, an attempt was made by a foreign government official to illegally CONTRIBUTE information. That's the difference as far as I can tell.

 

[herdfan429]

Hillary met with Russians? Hillary shared election-related data with Russians?

What part of the statute is too difficult for you to understand?

Hillary used foreign sources to gain an advantage during an election. The exact same thing you are claiming trump has done

 

[countryroads89]

Hillary used foreign sources to gain an advantage during an election. The exact same thing you are claiming trump has done

Hillary hired an AMERICAN firm.

The trump campaign met with Russians.
The trump campaign shared data with Russians.
The trump campaign had over one hundred contacts with Russians.
The trump campaign encouraged the leaking of information stolen from a hacked email account.

 

[herd66]

Hillary covered up for her whoremongering husband who had sexual affairs while he was president.

 

[herdfan429]

Hillary hired an AMERICAN firm.

The trump campaign met with Russians.
The trump campaign shared data with Russians.
The trump campaign had over one hundred contacts with Russians.
The trump campaign encouraged the leaking of information stolen from a hacked email account.

Contact is not illegal. You said so yourself.

 

[mlblack16.]

52 USC 30121

(a) ProhibitionIt shall be unlawful for—
foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make—
(A)
a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;
(B)
a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or
(C)
an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or
(2)
a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.
foreign national” means—
(1)
a foreign principal, as such term is defined by section 611(b) of title 22, except that the term “foreign national” shall not include any individual who is a citizen of the United States; or
(2)
an individual who is not a citizen of the United States or a national of the United States (as defined in section 1101(a)(22) of title 8) and who is not lawfully admitted for permanent residence, as defined by section 1101(a)(20) of title 8.

In layman's terms - it is unlawful to accept a contribution (any thing of value) from a foreign national (an individual who is not a citizen of the United States) in connection with a federal election.

LMFAO!!!

Nice copy/paste job. GTFO!

 

[countryroads89]

LMFAO!!!

Nice copy/paste job. GTFO!

Um yeah, I copied the law since numbnuts didn’t understand what is and what is not legal. What did you want me to do?

 

[herdfan429]

Um yeah, I copied the law since numbnuts didn’t understand what is and what is not legal. What did you want me to do?

The statute also said Hillary mishandled classified material but luckily not one prosecutor on earth would take that case

 

[mlblack16.]

The statute also said Hillary mishandled classified material but luckily not one prosecutor on earth would take that case

Hell no. Not unless they want to find themselves falling down a dark stairwell onto some bullets.

 

[19MU88]

Contact is not illegal. You said so yourself.

Not to mention the Russians were connected to HRCs lackeys creating the dossier

 

[countryroads89]

The statute also said Hillary mishandled classified material but luckily not one prosecutor on earth would take that case

Huh? You obviously don’t understand statute means law.

 

[herdfan429]

Huh? You obviously don’t understand statute means law.

Yeah I do, just a different statute that I didn’t link to but since you’re the legal scholar I’m sure you can look up which one