I read it, I comprehend just fine, but unlike you I am not a simple minded sucker for propaganda lies looking for anything
bogus or not to support my illogical logic. and since your such a wiz at reading comprehension be sure to hit the links for a little depth.
Look at this: since his election win, the Trump rally has added $4.1 trillion to the nation's wealth. Anyone with a 401k, an IRA, college savings, retirement savings, mutual funds. Anyone with a dime in the market has taken a piece of that $4 trillion.
Also, during this presidency, 5 American companies have emerged as global technology leaders. You know their names: Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Microsoft and Facebook. It’s a technology world, and American companies have seized the future.
The argument here, such as it exists, is that these companies have suddenly became “global technology leaders” in the last six months, and that this is a credit to Trump? I don't even know where to begin with that logic. I seem to remember iPods being around more than a decade ago.
And this is hardly the first time bogus numbers and logic have been used to argue for Trump's successes.
See here.
And here. And
here, at the 100-day mark, when Conway emphasized that no president since 1900 had ever installed a Supreme Court justice in his first 100 days as Trump had. (Never mind that no one had entered office with a vacancy since President Chester A. Arthur in 1881 and few other presidents had one in their first 100 days.)
The point isn't to rag on Trump's people here. Some arguments are better than others, and maybe they didn't look at that Examiner story closely. But if the White House and its defenders think there is a good story to tell about what's been happening over the last six months, they should probably tell that story instead of focusing on inflated numbers and suppositions like this.
Not doing so just makes them look like they don't actually have an argument.
