I've answered that question many times...he's a lying coward.Why are you running from the thread where I posted evidence of the bets?
sign here, coward >>>> ________________________Trump in 2024 will be a landslide
sign here, coward >>>> ________________________Trump in a landslide
You failed to post where I accepted and signed. Blame mush for not suiting up for the game. Plus, herdman and serg both wrote that you have no say on the matter.Why are you running from the thread where I posted evidence of the bets?
I did in this thread: https://marshall.forums.rivals.com/threads/ive-made-a-ruling.66571/You failed to post where I accepted and signed. Blame mush for not suiting up for the game. Plus, herdman and serg both wrote that you have no say on the matter.
sign here, coward >>>> ________________________Trump in 2024 will be a landslide
sign here, coward >>>> ________________________Trump in a landslide
A few years ago, you agreed to a self ban and then welched when it was time to pay your debt.I did in this thread: https://marshall.forums.rivals.com/threads/ive-made-a-ruling.66571/
Your original bet, in your words, was if trump is the Republican nominee, he will win in a landslide. There was neither mention in either of those original bets that the Democratic nominee had to be Biden. The bet was only about trump being the candidate and winning in a landslide.
Only later, after you offered the original bet multiple times and had it accepted, did you then try changing it to including Biden. But the original bet had been offered and accepted. Further, you later referenced the "original" bet being the one that was live.
So unless there is other evidence, the ruling is final, and based on the evidence in the link, there is really no way to argue out of that.
You haven't lost until trump doesn't win in a landslide. E.T. hasn't lost based on Biden's resignation, since the original bet never assigned Biden to E.T.
A few years ago, you agreed to a self ban and then welched when it was time to pay your debt.
You were called out for it with multiple posters referring to you as a "welcher" but then you pretended that you never made such a statement and did your typical deflection. @big_country90 Rox @MichiganHerd all called you out for it.
Not surprising you encouraging your old gay uncle to do the same. Like birds of a feather...
sign here, coward >>>> ________________________Trump in 2024 will be a landslide
sign here, coward >>>> ________________________Trump in a landslide
Yes, EG lost already.I did in this thread: https://marshall.forums.rivals.com/threads/ive-made-a-ruling.66571/
Your original bet, in your words, was if trump is the Republican nominee, he will win in a landslide. There was neither mention in either of those original bets that the Democratic nominee had to be Biden. The bet was only about trump being the candidate and winning in a landslide.
Only later, after you offered the original bet multiple times and had it accepted, did you then try changing it to including Biden. But the original bet had been offered and accepted. Further, you later referenced the "original" bet being the one that was live.
So unless there is other evidence, the ruling is final, and based on the evidence in the link, there is really no way to argue out of that.
You haven't lost until trump doesn't win in a landslide. E.T. hasn't lost based on Biden's resignation, since the original bet never assigned Biden to E.T.
You're a stupid bald-faced lying trumptard oath breaker with zero credibility.Yes, EG lost already.
You're a fvcking faggitYou're a stupid bald-faced lying trumptard oath breaker with zero credibility.
sign here, coward >>>> ________________________Trump in 2024 will be a landslide
sign here, coward >>>> ________________________Trump in a landslide