ADVERTISEMENT

Imagine That. Another Group of Democrats Caught Rigging Elections

Kemp in Georgia is a Republican.
Native Americans in North Dakota being denied voting rights is being done by Republicans.
 
I love watching democrats argue how voter ID laws are racist. It warms my heart to watch greeds 1 and 2 argue with a straight face that requiring proof of identity to vote is asking too much.

I adore watching republicans attempt to suppress the votes of the poor by attempting to remedy a nonexistent problem.
 
I love watching democrats argue how voter ID laws are racist. It warms my heart to watch greeds 1 and 2 argue with a straight face that requiring proof of identity to vote is asking too much.
44219818_10210683757924993_8791874990661173248_n.jpg
 
I love watching democrats argue how voter ID laws are racist. It warms my heart to watch greeds 1 and 2 argue with a straight face that requiring proof of identity to vote is asking too much.

You are so ignorant to reality that you claim blacks aren't targeted by police more than any other group in the country. The Proud Boys aren't even dumb enough, ignorant enough, or racist enough to make that claim.

Knowing you believe that, nobody is surprised that you don't have the intelligence to understand how voter ID laws are inherently discriminatory against the poor, many of whom are minorities, due to historically racist policies.
 
You are so ignorant to reality that you claim blacks aren't targeted by police more than any other group in the country. The Proud Boys aren't even dumb enough, ignorant enough, or racist enough to make that claim.

Knowing you believe that, nobody is surprised that you don't have the intelligence to understand how voter ID laws are inherently discriminatory against the poor, many of whom are minorities, due to historically racist policies.
seriously, how so? every single legal american citizen has access to an identification, whether it be a driver license or state issued ID card. and, there is zero, or very minimal, cost to obtain one.

why can't mentally deranged fvcking anti-american pieces of shit liberals just fvcking admit they want illegals to vote so they have a better chance of 2016 never reoccurring? it has not one thing to do with "minorities", "historically racist policies", nor any other "poor". it's about votes from illegals. just fvcking admit it already and stop, for the love of all things american, exploiting minorities and the poor in the pathetic attempt to justify illegals being allowed to vote.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mlblack16.
You are so ignorant to reality that you claim blacks aren't targeted by police more than any other group in the country. The Proud Boys aren't even dumb enough, ignorant enough, or racist enough to make that claim.

Knowing you believe that, nobody is surprised that you don't have the intelligence to understand how voter ID laws are inherently discriminatory against the poor, many of whom are minorities, due to historically racist policies.

Ask any black person and they would tell you that it is racist to assume that they would not have some form of identification.
 
You are so ignorant to reality that you claim blacks aren't targeted by police more than any other group in the country. The Proud Boys aren't even dumb enough, ignorant enough, or racist enough to make that claim.

Knowing you believe that, nobody is surprised that you don't have the intelligence to understand how voter ID laws are inherently discriminatory against the poor, many of whom are minorities, due to historically racist policies.

It’s so easy to get a gun but by god getting an id is so difficult that there is an entire group of people that can’t get one.
 
yep democrats are racist to the bone.The county I reside in is the poorest per -capita in income in the state of Ohio. In the 2016 election our county had the same turnout as the average county in the state. Why is this important? Because the very people the libs say requiring an id to vote hurts turned out and voted. Funny thing is most here, 90% are white. Here is the dilemma, they either have to abandon the poor(black) is disfranchised view or say that poor white people who live out in the hollers can get an id better than blacks who live a couple blocks from where they vote and can register in the large urban cities.
 
Last edited:
voter ID laws are inherently discriminatory against the poor, many of whom are minorities, due to historically racist policies.

Please explain without dragging irrelevant content into your argument.

How and why is asking everyone to provide some type of identification racist? Now, if we only required minorities to provide ID then you would definitely have a valid argument, but, as FAN said, this is really about the Dems needing votes to win and they don't give a shit if the votes come from dead people, let alone illegal aliens.

Rhetorical question: Do you support the right for illegal aliens to vote in elections?
 
With all the illegals voting, Pence couldn't find any. Incompetence on his part?
 
There is nothing more racist that leftist white people claiming voter ID laws are racist just so democrats can cheat in elections. You’re essentially saying minorities aren’t even capable of getting a free government-issued ID. How is that possible? Let’s go to greed 1 and 2 fantasyland and pretend that’s true. How is that person going to vote?

 
There is nothing more racist that leftist white people claiming voter ID laws are racist just so democrats can cheat in elections. You’re essentially saying minorities aren’t even capable of getting a free government-issued ID. How is that possible? Let’s go to greed 1 and 2 fantasyland and pretend that’s true. How is that person going to vote?



First of all, learn the English language.

Secondly, "free government-issued ID" is only available to certain groups in certain areas. I shit you not, I just clicked on a link to a "free ID card" for the state of NC and the link was broken and said "no information is available."

LMAO!
 
First of all, learn the English language.

Secondly, "free government-issued ID" is only available to certain groups in certain areas. I shit you not, I just clicked on a link to a "free ID card" for the state of NC and the link was broken and said "no information is available."

LMAO!

Gee, I wonder who those “certain people in certain areas” are? Uh, maybe minorities in solidly blue districts?
 
LOL looks like the truth has landed a knock out punch here to all the liberals on this board! Like the democrats have always said, vote early and vote often! Yep nothing has changed.
 
Oh look everyone! Polls!

Say, wasn't Hillary leading in the polls (predicting a landslide) all the way up to election night?

LMAO!! GTFO!!


You’re an idiot. Learn which “polls” the article is talking about.

I know elementary kids smarter than you.
 
You’re an idiot. Learn which “polls” the article is talking about.

I know elementary kids smarter than you.
i'd say the type of "poles" your wife leaves snail tracks on in a strip club, but that would insinuate you're hetero, and we all know that's not correct. so, probably more like the "poles" that ram you in the throat and ass on the reg.
 
How and why is asking everyone to provide some type of identification racist?

Ask any black person and they would tell you that it is racist to assume that they would not have some form of identification.

I totally missed this thread last week.

This is a perfect example of two morons struggling with reading comprehension.

I didn't claim in this thread that requiring ID is racist. Try to find where I did in this thread. You can't. What I did claim was that requiring IDs is discriminatory against the poor. I elaborated by stating that the poor is comprised of a disproportionate amount of minorities, much of the time due to inherently racist policies/actions (which I am more than happy to go over with you if you are too blind), so in essence, our current ID laws are racist. Requiring IDs isn't directly racist but is discriminatory against the poor.

seriously, how so? every single legal american citizen has access to an identification, whether it be a driver license or state issued ID card. and, there is zero, or very minimal, cost to obtain one.

I've gone over this before. You can read the link below to get a better idea. Even a Republican like Carl agrees that many parts of the law are wrong.

I have no problem teaching you all things. But if you don't have the ability to retain things for more than a few months or if you don't have the ability to comprehend what you read, then you're just wasting my time:

https://marshall.forums.rivals.com/threads/crowley-loses-ny.39343/
 
Maybe I'm simplifying this, IDK....
"Poor" people generally receive some sort of government assistance. Welfare, food stamps, EBT cards - something. When they enroll for a form of benefits, do they not provide identification? Of course they do.
I'm just using California as an example. We can all agree that overall, California is a left-leaning state and that it has an enormous population that covers almost all demographics and has rural and urban representation within its state lines.
Here are the requirements to receive the Calfresh card in California:
(I just included a few of the requirements, if you would like to see the entire application, here's the link: http://www.cdss.ca.gov/cdssweb/entres/forms/English/CF285.pdf

CalFresh Required Documents
  • Identity of applicant. Birth certificate. Driver's license, Passport ...
  • Social Security Numbers. Only the members are required to be verified in CalFresh. ...
  • Immigration status. All documents and forms must be verified through the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlement (SAVE). ...
  • Residence. Driver's license

I guess what I don't understand is if poor people in California have already managed to jump through the hoops to get their benefits, why would it be an issue to show an ID to vote? Again, I just used Cali as an example, but pretty much every state requires the same info from the poor to give assistance. Poor people have ID.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mlblack16.
Maybe I'm simplifying this, IDK....
"Poor" people generally receive some sort of government assistance. Welfare, food stamps, EBT cards - something. When they enroll for a form of benefits, do they not provide identification? Of course they do.
I'm just using California as an example. We can all agree that overall, California is a left-leaning state and that it has an enormous population that covers almost all demographics and has rural and urban representation within its state lines.
Here are the requirements to receive the Calfresh card in California:
(I just included a few of the requirements, if you would like to see the entire application, here's the link: http://www.cdss.ca.gov/cdssweb/entres/forms/English/CF285.pdf

CalFresh Required Documents
  • Identity of applicant. Birth certificate. Driver's license, Passport ...
  • Social Security Numbers. Only the members are required to be verified in CalFresh. ...
  • Immigration status. All documents and forms must be verified through the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlement (SAVE). ...
  • Residence. Driver's license

I guess what I don't understand is if poor people in California have already managed to jump through the hoops to get their benefits, why would it be an issue to show an ID to vote? Again, I just used Cali as an example, but pretty much every state requires the same info from the poor to give assistance. Poor people have ID.
because that would be true and democrats make up stuff on a daily basis.
 
Maybe I'm simplifying this, IDK....
"Poor" people generally receive some sort of government assistance. Welfare, food stamps, EBT cards - something. When they enroll for a form of benefits, do they not provide identification? Of course they do.
I'm just using California as an example. We can all agree that overall, California is a left-leaning state and that it has an enormous population that covers almost all demographics and has rural and urban representation within its state lines.
Here are the requirements to receive the Calfresh card in California:
(I just included a few of the requirements, if you would like to see the entire application, here's the link: http://www.cdss.ca.gov/cdssweb/entres/forms/English/CF285.pdf

CalFresh Required Documents
  • Identity of applicant. Birth certificate. Driver's license, Passport ...
  • Social Security Numbers. Only the members are required to be verified in CalFresh. ...
  • Immigration status. All documents and forms must be verified through the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlement (SAVE). ...
  • Residence. Driver's license

I guess what I don't understand is if poor people in California have already managed to jump through the hoops to get their benefits, why would it be an issue to show an ID to vote? Again, I just used Cali as an example, but pretty much every state requires the same info from the poor to give assistance. Poor people have ID.

Let me help:

Years ago, I needed my birth certificate for something. I can't remember if it was for a passport or something else, but what I presented was wrong. I presented a birth certificate from the hospital where I was born. It was what my parents had from day one. I was told that I needed the actual something-or-another from the state's vital records division. I had no familiarity with that and just assumed that the document with the "Birth Certificate" and raised seal from my hospital was sufficient.

I had to pay about $40 to get the actual certificate needed. So regardless if I never was given the document or it was simply lost, I am now having to pay to get a document to be able to vote. That's a poll tax.

A few months ago, I had to send a copy of my SS card to a government agency. I couldn't find mine. Though I believe they sent me a replacement for free, I had to have a computer/internet/mailing address to receive it. Those are all burdens and costly for poor people.

And that doesn't take into account all of the other things the poor (who are disproportionately minorities) have to face to obtain these documents.
 
I guess what I don't understand is if poor people in California have already managed to jump through the hoops to get their benefits, why would it be an issue to show an ID to vote? Again, I just used Cali as an example, but pretty much every state requires the same info from the poor to give assistance. Poor people have ID.

It's not an issue. The only reason Democrats want this is so all the degenerate thugs and illegals can line up at the polls without being questioned. This will allow as little effort as needed for people who otherwise would not bother voting.
 
Let me help:

Years ago, I needed my birth certificate for something. I can't remember if it was for a passport or something else, but what I presented was wrong. I presented a birth certificate from the hospital where I was born. It was what my parents had from day one. I was told that I needed the actual something-or-another from the state's vital records division. I had no familiarity with that and just assumed that the document with the "Birth Certificate" and raised seal from my hospital was sufficient.

I had to pay about $40 to get the actual certificate needed. So regardless if I never was given the document or it was simply lost, I am now having to pay to get a document to be able to vote. That's a poll tax.

A few months ago, I had to send a copy of my SS card to a government agency. I couldn't find mine. Though I believe they sent me a replacement for free, I had to have a computer/internet/mailing address to receive it. Those are all burdens and costly for poor people.

And that doesn't take into account all of the other things the poor (who are disproportionately minorities) have to face to obtain these documents.

The poor (regardless of the color of their skin) have already had to jump through those hoops you just listed in order to receive the benefits that they are actively getting. They must have their ID to get them. Zero additional documentation would need to be rounded up. There is no poll tax - in essence, they were charged for applying for benefits. Interestingly enough, no one really has an issue with that occurring.
 
Last edited:
The poor have already had to jump through those hoops you just listed in order to receive the benefits that they are actively getting. They must have their ID to get them. Zero additional documentation would need to be rounded up.

That's a pretty broad, inaccurate narrative. Not all poor receive welfare. Further, even if have received it, regardless of what they showed to get it years ago, it doesn't mean that they still have it (much like I didn't have the certificate from the state vital & records department years ago, much like I didn't have my SS card a few months ago, etc.).
 
That's a pretty broad, inaccurate narrative. Not all poor receive welfare. Further, even if have received it, regardless of what they showed to get it years ago, it doesn't mean that they still have it (much like I didn't have the certificate from the state vital & records department years ago, much like I didn't have my SS card a few months ago, etc.).
Is it more accurate than your assertion that the poor may have a hard time trying to keep track of documents. Be realistic, poor people have Id's. Poor people go to the grocery store and buy beer, they go to the pharmacy and get medicine, and (in this day and age) most have bank accounts (the government requires it for some benefit disbursement). They have to have ID's to accomplish some very basic tasks in today's world.
 
No one in the ghetto buys beer at the grocery store. Hell, most of the time the ghetto doesn't have a grocery store.

You buy beer at the liquor store. Or maybe a bodega. Neither of which are picky about asking for ID.
Hey rifle...here’s someone painting w a broad brush....

Btw, not all poor people live in the ghetto. And those that do actually do have access to grocery stores, don’t be dense. Would you like to soft toss another one?

*A quick google search showed a map with 23 grocery stores inside the 264 loop in Louisville. I’m pretty familiar with the downtown area, there are several areas that would be deemed ghetto. All are within walking distance to at least 1 major grocery store.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ThunderCat98
I totally missed this thread last week.

This is a perfect example of two morons struggling with reading comprehension.

I didn't claim in this thread that requiring ID is racist. Try to find where I did in this thread. You can't. What I did claim was that requiring IDs is discriminatory against the poor. I elaborated by stating that the poor is comprised of a disproportionate amount of minorities, much of the time due to inherently racist policies/actions (which I am more than happy to go over with you if you are too blind), so in essence, our current ID laws are racist. Requiring IDs isn't directly racist but is discriminatory against the poor.



I've gone over this before. You can read the link below to get a better idea. Even a Republican like Carl agrees that many parts of the law are wrong.

I have no problem teaching you all things. But if you don't have the ability to retain things for more than a few months or if you don't have the ability to comprehend what you read, then you're just wasting my time:

https://marshall.forums.rivals.com/threads/crowley-loses-ny.39343/
Yeah, I read all your excuses for illegal votes. You say we are wasting your time? Cool, stop posting . . . except for your female conquests, except we haven't seen one of those in quite some time. Post pussy pics, or go away. Face it, that's all you're good for on this site. Don't take that wrong though, because it is much appreciated.
 
Hey rifle...here’s someone painting w a broad brush....

Btw, not all poor people live in the ghetto. And those that do actually do have access to grocery stores, don’t be dense. Would you like to soft toss another one?

*A quick google search showed a map with 23 grocery stores inside the 264 loop in Louisville. I’m pretty familiar with the downtown area, there are several areas that would be deemed ghetto. All are within walking distance to at least 1 major grocery store.

You might want to check the west end again. You are counting some strange places as grocery stores. And after you do, PM me and let me know when you will be walking to the grocery store there. I can drop you off at W Broadway and S 41st. Say, 11pm, that's a good beer drinking time.

And believe me, I've bought my share of beer in the west end, before Indiana finally pissed off God and started selling beer on Sundays.

You don't be dense...white people buy beer at the grocery store. And box of wine.
 
Is it more accurate than your assertion that the poor may have a hard time trying to keep track of documents.

Is that a question or are you trying to make an argument?

Be realistic, poor people have Id's. Poor people go to the grocery store and buy beer, they go to the pharmacy and get medicine, and (in this day and age) most have bank accounts (the government requires it for some benefit disbursement). They have to have ID's to accomplish some very basic tasks in today's world.

And do you know what they can't do with many of those IDs? They can't vote. They can use state and federal employment IDs for all types of things . . . except voting in some states. They can use student IDs for many things . . . except vote in some states.

No, not all people have IDs. The fact that it costs money to obtain them (either directly for the tangible ID or the process to get it) prohibits them from obtaining IDs.

Btw, not all poor people live in the ghetto. And those that do actually do have access to grocery stores, don’t be dense. Would you like to soft toss another one?

*A quick google search showed a map with 23 grocery stores inside the 264 loop in Louisville. I’m pretty familiar with the downtown area, there are several areas that would be deemed ghetto. All are within walking distance to at least 1 major grocery store.

You're out of your fvcking mind if you think there are grocery stores (not corner stores, grocery stores) anywhere near the same ratio in ghettos than there are other areas. It's as much of an economic factor as anything.


Yeah, I read all your excuses for illegal votes. You say we are wasting your time? Cool, stop posting . . . except for your female conquests, except we haven't seen one of those in quite some time. Post pussy pics, or go away. Face it, that's all you're good for on this site. Don't take that wrong though, because it is much appreciated.

"I can't refute any of the logical points you made, so I am not going to try."
 
You might want to check the west end again. You are counting some strange places as grocery stores. And after you do, PM me and let me know when you will be walking to the grocery store there. I can drop you off at W Broadway and S 41st. Say, 11pm, that's a good beer drinking time.

And believe me, I've bought my share of beer in the west end, before Indiana finally pissed off God and started selling beer on Sundays.

You don't be dense...white people buy beer at the grocery store. And box of wine.
Damn, where to begin w this hyperbole...
Just because the sign out front doesn’t say Walmart or Kroger doesn’t mean they aren’t grocery stores. What does me walking into a grocery store have to do with any part of this discussion? I’ll help you out, nothing. The point was people are asked for ID’s in many, many situations.
Poor people have state issued ID’s whether they use them at Kroger or don’t have to show them at Uncle Tom’s corner market, it doesn’t change the fact that they have them. I deal with some of the poorest of the poor in our region and have yet to come across someone that either didn’t have one or was incapable of getting one within a very short timeframe.

*And for those that aren’t well-versed in the Louisville area, the west end is by no means the only area that can be described as ghetto. Raoul just cherry-picked the area that could somewhat uphold his weak argument that poor people (those that live in the ghetto) don’t have access to a grocery store.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT