Oh man 30 days!?!?! For a process crime at that?!?!! Mueller sure is tightening the noose around trump
I’m sure he is. My point is if he was seeking collusion charges having these guys plead out to lying doesn’t exactly help fill his witness list wth credible people.Personally, I think Mueller is better than what you think he is.
I’m sure he is. My point is if he was seeking collusion charges having these guys plead out to lying doesn’t exactly help fill his witness list wth credible people.
If they're pleading to lying, then that means he's finding the truth.
Oh man 30 days!?!?! For a process crime at that?!?!! Mueller sure is tightening the noose around trump
Then why hasn’t huma abedin been charged? Look at the end of the day it’s a process crime that is selectively enforced. With what we know mueller is just dropping crumbs for you resistance types to get their hopes up. Does he have something on trump, I doubt it, and this type of stuff lends more credence to my point of view than your sidesLying to investigators is still a felony. This guy was a small, incidental fish caught along the way.
this type of stuff lends more credence to my point of view than your sides
When you have no rebuttal resort to grammar attacksWhy do so many of you wing nuts struggle with whether or not to use an apostrophe?
Lying to the fbi
her and mills stated to the fbi they didn’t know about Clinton’s private server yet emails show they were acutely aware of said email. That is a lie the exact same charge as FlynnLink?
I tried to find a crime by abedin and couldn't.
her and mills stated to the fbi they didn’t know about Clinton’s private server yet emails show they were acutely aware of said email. That is a lie the exact same charge as Flynn
Then go fvcking find one. It’s not on politicfact or snopes so you won’t believe it anywayI didn't ask for your opinion, I asked for a link.
Then go fvcking find one. It’s not on politicfact or snopes so you won’t believe it anyway
Nope I have links but you can use the google and find them just as easily as I did. You will completely ignore them even though many of them have primary sourced evidence such as fbi statements and copies of said emails.I'm guessing that means you can't find a link to back up your statement.
Nope I have links but you can use the google and find them just as easily as I did. You will completely ignore them even though many of them have primary sourced evidence such as fbi statements and copies of said emails.
Last October, Mueller brought the first indictments against former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and his deputy, Richard Gates. Notably, none of the indictments were linked to the campaign, let alone Trump. So we move forward and then, in November, came the disclosure of plea agreements with former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn and former campaign foreign policy adviser George Papadopolos. However, these pleas were for making individual false statements to federal investigators. Neither the charges nor the narratives in the filings tied Trump or his campaign to any criminal act. Later indictments involving lawyer Alex van der Zwaan and internet operator Richard Pinedo involved a false statement and a single count of identity fraud, again unrelated to Trump or his campaign. Nevertheless, commentators insisted Mueller was just laying the groundwork for his major filing.Sorry guys he is not in trouble because he didnt do anything wrong.
Learn to google
Figure out how to google firstLearn the difference between fact and opinion.
Figure out how to google first
Why do so many of you wing nuts struggle with whether or not to use an apostrophe?