ADVERTISEMENT

InSight

GK4Herd

Moderator
Moderator
Aug 5, 2001
17,350
12,089
113
It’s kind of sad how little attention that yesterday’s Mars landing is getting among the general population. The science involved in safely landing these robotics on Mars surface is unbelievably complicated and difficult. The lander has to hit the upper atmosphere at such a precise angle to be successful. If it’s too shallow it skips off. If it’s too steep it burns up. It has to slow its speed from 12000 mph down to 5 mph before it reaches the surface. NASA calls the trek from the upper atmosphere to the surface, “Seven Minutes of Terror.”

https://www.theverge.com/2018/11/26...s-lander-landing-success-supersonic-parachute


Unlike the previous rover missions, InSight will be stationary. It will be taking measurements to learn about Mars core. Our core is molten and spins creating the magnetic field necessary to protect us from the radiation of the sun. Mars core cooled and hardened at one point and after it lost its magnetic field the sun’s radiation stripped it of much of its atmosphere and water. But it is believed that before that Mars was much like Earth. This is why Mars is of interest to scientist...the possibility that evidence of prior life might exist.

Yet no one is talking about it.
 
It’s kind of sad how little attention that yesterday’s Mars landing is getting among the general population. The science involved in safely landing these robotics on Mars surface is unbelievably complicated and difficult. The lander has to hit the upper atmosphere at such a precise angle to be successful. If it’s too shallow it skips off. If it’s too steep it burns up. It has to slow its speed from 12000 mph down to 5 mph before it reaches the surface. NASA calls the trek from the upper atmosphere to the surface, “Seven Minutes of Terror.”

https://www.theverge.com/2018/11/26...s-lander-landing-success-supersonic-parachute


Unlike the previous rover missions, InSight will be stationary. It will be taking measurements to learn about Mars core. Our core is molten and spins creating the magnetic field necessary to protect us from the radiation of the sun. Mars core cooled and hardened at one point and after it lost its magnetic field the sun’s radiation stripped it of much of its atmosphere and water. But it is believed that before that Mars was much like Earth. This is why Mars is of interest to scientist...the possibility that evidence of prior life might exist.

Yet no one is talking about it.
Mars? Meh, show me the water & then bring me their seafood. I bet space tuna is delicious.

To be fair, that landing was boring as hell. To watch what, two engineers do a three second handshake? The science behind all this is amazing but this is America baby, you gotta promise someone could die or at the very least a big ass explosion.

I'm still amazed every time Tesla lands a rocket it doesn't get more coverage.
 
It’s kind of sad how little attention that yesterday’s Mars landing is getting among the general population. The science involved in safely landing these robotics on Mars surface is unbelievably complicated and difficult. The lander has to hit the upper atmosphere at such a precise angle to be successful. If it’s too shallow it skips off. If it’s too steep it burns up. It has to slow its speed from 12000 mph down to 5 mph before it reaches the surface. NASA calls the trek from the upper atmosphere to the surface, “Seven Minutes of Terror.”

https://www.theverge.com/2018/11/26...s-lander-landing-success-supersonic-parachute


Unlike the previous rover missions, InSight will be stationary. It will be taking measurements to learn about Mars core. Our core is molten and spins creating the magnetic field necessary to protect us from the radiation of the sun. Mars core cooled and hardened at one point and after it lost its magnetic field the sun’s radiation stripped it of much of its atmosphere and water. But it is believed that before that Mars was much like Earth. This is why Mars is of interest to scientist...the possibility that evidence of prior life might exist.

Yet no one is talking about it.

A stationary lander just isn't as sexy as a rover, for whatever reason.

Plus we've had the capability to put a lander on mars, albeit nowhere near as reliably, for about 45+ years now. While I'm personally intrigued, I can understand the general public not being as enthralled with this one.

Until we land something again in a new manner ala the sky crane, I doubt the public will get too worked up over mars again till we start seriously discussing sending people there .
 
I just hope Arnold is alive to see it.

Too late for this fvcker...

HSIr.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThunderCat98
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT