ADVERTISEMENT

It is a shame when Hillary Clinton has more balls than most men in politics.

i am herdman

Platinum Buffalo
Gold Member
Mar 5, 2006
88,955
35,014
113
People get on Trump, but can you imagine what she would have done to most Republicans? Destroyed them.

Men, could learn some lessons from Hillary. She is at least tough. I don't like her or agree with her about 98.872345% of the time. But, some of the men we have in politics today are sissies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio herd
People get on Trump, but can you imagine what she would have done to most Republicans? Destroyed them.

Men, could learn some lessons from Hillary. She is at least tough. I don't like her or agree with her about 98.872345% of the time. But, some of the men we have in politics today are sissies.

I believe this is a micro-aggression.
 
It would have been McCain or Romney all over again. Either apologizing to the opponent like McCain or Romney's classy huffing quietly in a corner after the 47% comment.

Trump went down swinging. I question those other 17 losers who played in the primaries. Any politician today who identifies as R and agrees to run for the presidency is signing up for a sure loss. Might as well just put Ls by their names from now on. Rs=Ls. Always lose.
 
George Bush was the last winner we had. That is because they ran Gorebot and that ding dong Kerry. We can't beat the blacks and women. Gay dude is next.
 
Can't beat anybody. That's what this proves. They're so far ahead in the demographics that they can run anything and win. Bernie would have won. Hell, Robert C. Byrd would have won. All it takes is Democrat. That's an automatic win in this thing now.

Not going to change until the giveaways fail. When the checks quit cashin' and the Democrats no longer have any gifts to give, maybe then people will get serious. Until then, we're playing around in a fairy tale. Republicans won't ever rain on that parade now. Too far gone until it fails completely.
 
Can't beat anybody. That's what this proves. They're so far ahead in the demographics that they can run anything and win. Bernie would have won. Hell, Robert C. Byrd would have won. All it takes is Democrat. That's an automatic win in this thing now.

Not going to change until the giveaways fail. When the checks quit cashin' and the Democrats no longer have any gifts to give, maybe then people will get serious. Until then, we're playing around in a fairy tale. Republicans won't ever rain on that parade now. Too far gone until it fails completely.

It is going to fail eventually. You can only give away stuff for so long. One day we will run out of handouts. Might get ugly then.
 
At least we've strategically cordoned them off into their own little war zones.

Something else that isn't going to change is in the nicer neighborhoods the cops notice when the shitty thug cars come in. They pull them over. If you want to keep a place where you can tax the hell out of rich people, you better damn well keep the thugs out. And they do.
 
You morons are going after the poor again when subsidies to the rich are almost double.
 
I said it after the 2012 election, that was really our last shot to turn it around. Now the only thing that gets a conservative back in power is a very unpopular war. Luckily for us, Hitlary is a hawk, so we should have plenty to choose from. Fear is the only thing that will make people look for strong leadership. Hard to change people when they are comfortable.
 
Who are you trying to kid? We both know you have no problem whining about the poor getting everything free while never even thinking about double the money going to the rich.

Gee no, I have not got on the big companies for leaving the country and selling us out. Have you been under a rock?

unfortunately poor people don;t provide jobs nor invent things or bring them to market. Sad, but true.
 
Gee no, I have not got on the big companies for leaving the country and selling us out. Have you been under a rock?

unfortunately poor people don;t provide jobs nor invent things or bring them to market. Sad, but true.

You see, you can't escape degrading the poor even when you try to defend yourself. First the rich don't provide jobs, the poor buy things, and the poor provide labor to make the rich....rich.
 
You see, you can't escape degrading the poor even when you try to defend yourself. First the rich don't provide jobs, the poor buy things, and the poor provide labor to make the rich....rich.

Ok, whatever. I am not degrading anyone. Poor men don't sign paychecks. Doesn't mean I like the rich any better.

But, what Walden says is true. The more dependents that are created the more the hard workers and driven people will make. And, that gap will widen. Look at the inner cities. Look at the places in Appalachia.
 
Doesn't mean I like the rich any better.

I'll believe that when you spend the next several years on this board attacking the wealthy for burdening the hard workers and the driven while taking your hard earned paycheck.
 
I said it after the 2012 election, that was really our last shot to turn it around...Hard to change people when they are comfortable.

2012 was no way no how no matter what, because of Jackie Robinson. If he wanted a third term, he would have gotten it. They would have broke the rules to let him have it. He just evidently doesn't like it and wants to go home.

Yeah, nothing is changing now. We're pushing the envelope. Might as well enjoy the ride. We have won the lottery and we're just trying to see what all we can waste it on at this point. Can't say I blame people really. This is the only life we get. Might as well splurge now, on programs, handouts, electing novelty acts, letting in all the strays of the world, etc.

Ironic though that the people who are OK with saddling the future with that are the first to whine around about global warming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: raleighherdfan
I'll believe that when you spend the next several years on this board attacking the wealthy for burdening the hard workers and the driven while taking your hard earned paycheck.

OK, rich business owners like you don't play their employees a fair wage.

How is that for a start?
 
Herdman, you have to keep in mind that extra is voluntarily stuck Out Wayne. All he sees is struggling white folk getting their benefits each month. This shapes his world view that opportunity for most just doesn't exist while he ignores the fact that those Out Wayne view Huntington as a big, intimidating city. They're not poor and downtrodden because the opportunities aren't there, it's because they don't have the confidence or intelligence to pursue them.

Rather than assigning responsibility where it belongs, he, like most white, holler trash, blames it on the mythical "rich guy getting government subsidies" and a rigged system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: raleighherdfan
OK, rich business owners like you don't play their employees a fair wage.

How is that for a start?

See, you STILL can't make an honest remark against the wealthy. You immediately resort to lying to cover your cowering to the rich.
 
Easy gentlemen. You are hitting a little to close to home for Greed. Once you blow up the premise of his attempt to converse all he has is "moron" claims.

I still think the height of his economic, racial hypocrisy came when he suggested the only way he would hire a black guy is if the government pays him to do it? A classic moment here on Herdnation.
 
X-ter is done here, he hasn't made a decent post in days. Obviously the compulsion to react and post every 30 seconds has taken a heavy toll. Nothing left but a clown stick figure.
 
Easy gentlemen. You are hitting a little to close to home for Greed. Once you blow up the premise of his attempt to converse all he has is "moron" claims.

I still think the height of his economic, racial hypocrisy came when he suggested the only way he would hire a black guy is if the government pays him to do it? A classic moment here on Herdnation.
It was job training not an actual job
 
First the rich don't provide jobs, the poor buy things, and the poor provide labor to make the rich....rich.

This kind of nonsensical economic belief is why Greed's business remains "small time".

Why does he degrade his two man workforce this way? How many poor families actually are able to afford the product he sells?

Guarangoddamntee no poor man is buying new kitchen cabinets from Greed. If a poor man could actually afford to start a cabinet business in the market there to compete against this kind ignorance, Greed would be out of business in 6 months.
 
those Out Wayne view Huntington as a big, intimidating city. They're not poor and downtrodden because the opportunities aren't there, it's because they don't have the confidence or intelligence to pursue them.

My younger days feel the burn on this one. I'd have likely lived my whole life like that if not for wanting to run the score up on the family.

Now that I've taken care of that (pretty low bar really), I can move on to standing around and looking at everything like I'm real old. Evidently not old enough though, as the standing quickly turns into a brisk walk.
 
X-ter is done here, he hasn't made a decent post in days. Obviously the compulsion to react and post every 30 seconds has taken a heavy toll. Nothing left but a clown stick figure.

I'm dealing with cons on here who believe the only meaningful post is that of a conspiracy theory.
 
You've hit that point where you've resorted to chronic lying again. Sales suits you well.

Did you not take away an hourly wage for an employee(s)? I recall you came on here years ago and stated you were taking away an hourly wage and putting them on a production/commissioned based plan. The guy was upset and you asked for advice.
 
Did you not take away an hourly wage for an employee(s)? I recall you came on here years ago and stated you were taking away an hourly wage and putting them on a production/commissioned based plan. The guy was upset and you asked for advice.

How many times have I already explained this to you in response to your lies? You lie and then say "didn't you" ......? I'm not going to answer that again, I'm just going to call you a liar......liar.
 
How many times have I already explained this to you in response to your lies? You lie and then say "didn't you" ......? I'm not going to answer that again, I'm just going to call you a liar......liar.

Well, you came on here and said you took away their hourly wage.
 
That's another lie.....liar.

Did you take away an hourly wage? You went to some sort of commission based or sales based plan for the worker(s).

Everybody knows it that was around this board then. Too bad all those guys got banned. They remember it.
 
Liar liar pants on fire.

Am not.. Are too.

Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me.

Know you are... What am i.

Sez who.

You and your Mother.
 
Did you take away an hourly wage? You went to some sort of commission based or sales based plan for the worker(s).

Everybody knows it that was around this board then. Too bad all those guys got banned. They remember it.

Like I said, I'm not going to re-tell the way it happened. The way you tell it is NOT the way it happened. You are simply a liar, you know you are, I know you are.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT