Based on bylaw B-10.7.2(e), the architect and/or chairman of this board has ultimate bet ruling authority. As a result, I have spent the last week spending substantial time going through the HN archives to research any bet regarding E.T. and the next presidential election.
The first bet that was both offered and accepted for the 2024 election was back in 12/20. As you can see, there was no mention of the Democratic candidate. The bet was only that trump would win in a landslide:
MIchigan also made the bet very clear by reiterating it on the same day, and once again, there was a mention of trump but not requirement of the Democratic nominee:
But then just over three years later, Michigan tried changing the bet that he both offered and agreed to with E.T. by trying to dictate who E.T..'s candidate was, which was not the original bet:
Exactly a month ago today, Michigan confirmed that he agreed to the "original" bet, because E.T. kept copying-and-pasting Michigan's original bet. As mentioned, the original bet was the one back in 12/20 which is posted above:
The first/original bet and the most recent one accepted by Michigan both had no restriction on E.T.'s candidate, just that if trump was running, he would win in a landslide. As a result, since that hasn't happened, E.T. is entirely permitted to regain his normal posting privileges. I would like to warn the deplorables to not misrepresent a bet in the future. This is your one and only warning, as a fellow deplorable has a history of posting forged receipts to lie about him fulfilling his end of a losing bet on here.
Congratulations and welcome back, E.T. God speed.
The first bet that was both offered and accepted for the 2024 election was back in 12/20. As you can see, there was no mention of the Democratic candidate. The bet was only that trump would win in a landslide:
MIchigan also made the bet very clear by reiterating it on the same day, and once again, there was a mention of trump but not requirement of the Democratic nominee:
But then just over three years later, Michigan tried changing the bet that he both offered and agreed to with E.T. by trying to dictate who E.T..'s candidate was, which was not the original bet:
Exactly a month ago today, Michigan confirmed that he agreed to the "original" bet, because E.T. kept copying-and-pasting Michigan's original bet. As mentioned, the original bet was the one back in 12/20 which is posted above:
The first/original bet and the most recent one accepted by Michigan both had no restriction on E.T.'s candidate, just that if trump was running, he would win in a landslide. As a result, since that hasn't happened, E.T. is entirely permitted to regain his normal posting privileges. I would like to warn the deplorables to not misrepresent a bet in the future. This is your one and only warning, as a fellow deplorable has a history of posting forged receipts to lie about him fulfilling his end of a losing bet on here.
Congratulations and welcome back, E.T. God speed.
