Joe Biden
- Thread starter Herd Fever
- Start date
The party of diversity just added another OLD WHITE MALE to their list of potential presidential candidates. Between Biden and Hillary and Bernie they have been inside the belt way for almost 100 combined years. Yep they sure do know the plight of us common folk in fly over country.
With the republican presidential field in the shape that it is, I don't believe I'd say much about the democrat field.
Well, what the democrats meant was that there are no good white people in the republican party.
I don't think Hillary is done but I have to wonder if Biden jumping into the race has anything to do with insider knowledge prior to Hillary's testimony on Thursday.
I have to agree with Herdman though. Biden will give us some entertainment value, he's the white Herman Cain.
I have to agree with Herdman though. Biden will give us some entertainment value, he's the white Herman Cain.
I'm no fan of hers but she did surprisingly well during the debate. She usually isn't that good in a forum setting. She might crumble when she's challenged by an opponent and has to think on the fly. Head to head debating is out of her comfort zone.
Seriously???? The Benghazi committee is responsible for identifying her private email server but that's where it ends. If you don't know the difference between the two investigations you might want to quit blindly supporting her and the Democrat talking points.
...and then made a big deal out of it, even though they knew that the former secretary of state did the same thing.
Deflection and half-truths are all you have. You don't know the differences between two different investigations, and like most of the public, don't care to learn. That's why people think Hillary's email and server is no big deal and applaud Bernie Sanders and his now famous quote. Hillary broke the law, you not caring doesn't change that fact.
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer —
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer —
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
§ 798. Disclosure of classified information
(a) Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates,furnishes, transmits, or otherwise
makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to
the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the
detriment of the United States any classified information—(1) concerning the nature, preparation, or use of any code, cipher, or cryptographic system of the United States or any foreign government;or (2) concerning the design, construction, use, maintenance, or repair of any device, apparatus, appliance used or prepared or planned for use by the United States or any foreign
government for cryptographic or communication intelligence purposes; or (3) concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government; or (4) obtained by the processes of communication intelligence from the communications of any foreign government, knowing the same to have been obtained by such processes—Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(a) Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates,furnishes, transmits, or otherwise
makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to
the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the
detriment of the United States any classified information—(1) concerning the nature, preparation, or use of any code, cipher, or cryptographic system of the United States or any foreign government;or (2) concerning the design, construction, use, maintenance, or repair of any device, apparatus, appliance used or prepared or planned for use by the United States or any foreign
government for cryptographic or communication intelligence purposes; or (3) concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government; or (4) obtained by the processes of communication intelligence from the communications of any foreign government, knowing the same to have been obtained by such processes—Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
Not yet. And she probably won't be with the way Barry's justice dept is run. Eg let me ask you a question do you always drive the speed limit?
Wait a minute. Didn't you say Hillary broke the law? But she's not been charged. Is this another conservative pre-emptive strike?
What do you not understand about an ongoing investigation?
Nixon was involved in Watergate beginning in June '72, investigations started in February of '73, House Judiciary Committee voted to impeach Nixon in July of '74 and ended with him resigning in August of 1974.
The FBI started its investigation into Gen. Petraeus in the summer of 2012. In April 2013 the FBI seized classified info from Petraeus' home. In March of 2015 Petraeus was charged and then pleaded guilty during a court date in April 2015.
She may never be charged due to who she is, but that doesn't mean she shouldn't be. And it sure as hell doesn't mean she's innocent.
Nixon was involved in Watergate beginning in June '72, investigations started in February of '73, House Judiciary Committee voted to impeach Nixon in July of '74 and ended with him resigning in August of 1974.
The FBI started its investigation into Gen. Petraeus in the summer of 2012. In April 2013 the FBI seized classified info from Petraeus' home. In March of 2015 Petraeus was charged and then pleaded guilty during a court date in April 2015.
She may never be charged due to who she is, but that doesn't mean she shouldn't be. And it sure as hell doesn't mean she's innocent.
Republicans are breaking ranks on both investigations.......HRC is going to be the Dem nominee.
Bush, Rubio, etc. better get on the ball.......She will crush Trump/Carson in the general election. I can't imagine what she would do to either of those guys in a head to head debate.
Bush, Rubio, etc. better get on the ball.......She will crush Trump/Carson in the general election. I can't imagine what she would do to either of those guys in a head to head debate.
Tell that to Charles McCollough, the Inspector General of Intelligence. He's the guy who reviewed her emails and found Top Secret material. He's also the guy who referred the case to National Counterintelligence and Security Center and the FBI.
It was not referred as a criminal case.
Were any emails labelled classified or top secret. No.
Emails Originated In State Dept. System, And Questions About Retroactive Classification Would Have Occurred Regardless Of Clinton's Server Use.
It Remains Unclear Whether Material In Two Emails Should Be Retroactively Classified.
So far, you have nothing Mr. Gowdy.
Hillary rarely if ever answers a hard question. Loves to play the victim card whenever the chance presents itself. Interestingly, Bernie didn't work too hard in the debate the other night (he is a puss) but actually jumped in the polls. The only Dems liking Hillary right now are rich democrats.....really RICH democrats. That's the only reason she gets the nomination (if she hangs around). Has nothing to do with her ability or competence. She owes a lot of favors. Money talks, along with being married to Bill.
It's the material that was classified, including KeyHole satellite intel . It doesn't matter if it was marked or not, that's some serious sh*t. All SATINT is highly classified, not if's and's or but's. And if the emails were originated on a State Dept system and ended up in Hillary's unsecured email that's a big deal. Classified material transferred to an unclassified system is called "Spillage", and it's a punishable offense. You don't know a thing about classified material handling and the only thing you can argue with is what the lazy and water carrying media fed you. Pathetic.
I told you exactly what I know and I've given black and white facts. The FBI wouldn't seize four separate servers without cause. There's no arguing she mismanaged classified material, weather she faces the music or not is yet to be seen.
Eg let's say you go to a top secret meeting and you discuss cabinet stains. You then email Someone and say we just talked about this new stain. Would that be classified or not?
