Kamala Lost Almost 20 Million Votes

[mufan08]

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

I presume those numbers aren't including CA though? Has anyone seen that? if it comes up that makes it look less suspect.

That's my take.

Also that as I had said, she's not an inspiring candidate at all. If she were a Republican and you were a voter that occasionally votes, would you turn out to vote for her? Of course not.

Dems should have picked Governor Andy. Make a clean break from the current administration and pick a charming motherfvcker with a record of economic growth in his state. But no, they got greedy for Biden's war chest.

 

[muthed]

Are we in the same thread? 81-66 = Almost 20

Kamala Lost Almost 20 Million Votes​

Ask rifle. He knows about numbers.

 

[wvkeeper(HN)]

Our media is clueless.

 

[-CarlHungus-]

That's my take.

Also that as I had said, she's not an inspiring candidate at all. If she were a Republican and you were a voter that occasionally votes, would you turn out to vote for her? Of course not.

Dems should have picked Governor Andy. Make a clean break from the current administration and pick a charming motherfvcker with a record of economic growth in his state. But no, they got greedy for Biden's war chest.

We will see soon enough when the final tally comes in.

If it is ~67 million then that 81 number looks out of place. Though I did nerd out and run some stats on it and depending upon whether you include the John Kerry election in your data set it can be within the 1.5 IQR (a crude way to seeing if it is an "outlier") and I think it was about 1.7 standard deviations outside of the mean, which is high but just outside of "statistically significant" difference from the mean (often described as two standard deviations).

The hot takes from blue anon about the low vote tallies this cycle though are cracking me up. They're looking at the same data and concluding 2020 was on the up and up and 2024 is shady.

 

[big_country90]

We will see soon enough when the final tally comes in.

If it is ~67 million then that 81 number looks out of place. Though I did nerd out and run some stats on it and depending upon whether you include the John Kerry election in your data set it can be within the 1.5 IQR (a crude way to seeing if it is an "outlier") and I think it was about 1.7 standard deviations outside of the mean, which is high but just outside of "statistically significant" difference from the mean (often described as two standard deviations).

The hot takes from blue anon about the low vote tallies this cycle though are cracking me up. They're looking at the same data and concluding 2020 was on the up and up and 2024 is shady.

As of right now (2:35 pm eastern), California has about 54% of its vote counted. Democrats have 5.6 million votes and Republicans have 3.9 million votes. Just double that and you have between 9- 10 million more votes coming.

I would say in total, you may have 12-13 million votes left count nationwide. Trump will end up winning the popular vote by about 3 million.

 

[19MU88]

That's my take.

Also that as I had said, she's not an inspiring candidate at all. If she were a Republican and you were a voter that occasionally votes, would you turn out to vote for her? Of course not.

Dems should have picked Governor Andy. Make a clean break from the current administration and pick a charming motherfvcker with a record of economic growth in his state. But no, they got greedy for Biden's war chest.

They just needed a pandemic, loosened rules, ballots and vans!!

Based on your comments it seems you are dumb enough to think those "occasional" voters turned out for Joe to the tune of 81 million in 2020. Stick to storm chasing and weather.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

They're looking at the same data and concluding 2020 was on the up and up and 2024 is shady.

I don't agree with that.

Based on your comments it seems you are dumb enough to think those "occasional" voters turned out for Joe to the tune of 81 million in 2020.

Being in a goddamn national emergency tends to make average people want to vote. Even more so when they can do it from the comfort of their homes that they are now working from or not leaving much.

Stick to storm chasing and weather.

Stick to drooling on yourself.

 

[19MU88]

I don't agree with that.

Being in a goddamn national emergency tends to make average people want to vote. Even more so when they can do it from the comfort of their homes that they are now working from or not leaving much.

Stick to drooling on yourself.

You are mad. And still clueless.

 

[-CarlHungus-]

I gotta say I’m a sucker for LoTR memes.