And just like that... they like it.
They are insane lunatics.If anyone with an 'R' after their name said that, they would be accused of inciting violence.
The double standard is ludicrous.
Theoretically you can kiss my ass, woman.
Dictator of DeathI guess if Trump is reelected he will have to come up with a catchy name for his assassination squad. Maybe the “Elimination Force.”
Her, Rifle, and Sotomayor 🤣🤣🤣
But hot damn a map with cross hairs on it is just inciting violence everywhere
Hey, Tier Three- Why don't you jump into the other thread and help your fellow deplorables out. It's pretty damning when Coney Barrett says the exact same thing I did.Her, Rifle, and Sotomayor 🤣🤣🤣
It's pretty damning when Coney Barrett says the exact same thing I did.
Moron, she concurred with the decision. Since I know you don't know what that means, she agreed with the court's ruling, so she wasn't in the minority, moron.Like you, her opinion is among the minority who think that.
You're wrong, dumbass.
So you think she believes a president now has the power to accept bribes and assassinate Supreme Court Justices?Moron, she concurred with the decision. Since I know you don't know what that means, she agreed with the court's ruling, so she wasn't in the minority, moron.
You should try reading to answer your own questions.So you think she believes a president now has the power to accept bribes and assassinate Supreme Court Justices?
The court's decision confirmed the law.
It didn't create any.
You should try reading to answer your own questions.
The decision prohibits a prosecutor from introducing testimony or evidence related to a president pardoning a person while at the same time receiving a bribe. Sure, you can normally prosecute the payment/quid aspect. But the prosecutor can't allow testimony from the president, his allies, or other evidence about the pardoning aspect.
So if you're sitting on a jury, you can hear all about the payment/quid aspect, but you will have no way to link that to the pardoning aspect since the prosecutor, as Coney Barrett (one of trump's justices) said, is "hamstrung" from doing that.
It's absurd.
You should try reading to answer your own questions.
The decision prohibits a prosecutor from introducing testimony or evidence related to a president pardoning a person while at the same time receiving a bribe. Sure, you can normally prosecute the payment/quid aspect. But the prosecutor can't allow testimony from the president, his allies, or other evidence about the pardoning aspect.
So if you're sitting on a jury, you can hear all about the payment/quid aspect, but you will have no way to link that to the pardoning aspect since the prosecutor, as Coney Barrett (one of trump's justices) said, is "hamstrung" from doing that.
It's absurd.
It's one thing to be an ideologue but to be so invested that you are happy to make a fool of yourself? Just amazingWrong. Like the bleating soldier you are, you're falling for the left's fear mongering.
This tells you where the liberals minds are as it relates to their political rivals doesn't it? Is there any doubt about what they claim a president (from their rival party) will/would do, is exactly what they will do.Stop being a pussy
Chief Justice John Roberts chided the liberal justices for 'fear mongering'
Justices claim immunity ruling allows presidents to poison staff, have Navy SEALs kill political rivals
Justices claim immunity ruling allows presidents to poison staff, have Navy SEALs kill political rivals
Liberal Supreme Court justices suggested the Trump immunity ruling allows for a president to assign a Navy SEAL team to assassinate a political rival or to poison a cabinet member.www.foxnews.com
Liberal justices? Moron, one of your own spoke out against it. Why are you and Roberts ignoring that? Stop getting all of your news from one source - especially one that has recently had to admit multiple times that they purposely misreport things - and you won't look so dumb.Stop being a pussy
Chief Justice John Roberts chided the liberal justices for 'fear mongering'
Justices claim immunity ruling allows presidents to poison staff, have Navy SEALs kill political rivals
Justices claim immunity ruling allows presidents to poison staff, have Navy SEALs kill political rivals
Liberal Supreme Court justices suggested the Trump immunity ruling allows for a president to assign a Navy SEAL team to assassinate a political rival or to poison a cabinet member.www.foxnews.com
Liberal justices? Moron, one of your own spoke out against it. Why are you and Roberts ignoring that? Stop getting all of your news from one source - especially one that has recently had to admit multiple times that they purposely misreport things - and you won't look so dumb.