ADVERTISEMENT

Let's be perfectly clear... libs don't give a rat a** about the Supreme Court decision.

Our president murdering our Supreme Court Justices is an official act now?

Democrats and their bleaters are bat shit crazy. Anyone voting for these idiots needs their head examined.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rvntx
Like you, her opinion is among the minority who think that.

You're wrong, dumbass.
Moron, she concurred with the decision. Since I know you don't know what that means, she agreed with the court's ruling, so she wasn't in the minority, moron.
 
Moron, she concurred with the decision. Since I know you don't know what that means, she agreed with the court's ruling, so she wasn't in the minority, moron.
So you think she believes a president now has the power to accept bribes and assassinate Supreme Court Justices?

The court's decision confirmed the law.

It didn't create any.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 19MU88
So you think she believes a president now has the power to accept bribes and assassinate Supreme Court Justices?

The court's decision confirmed the law.

It didn't create any.
You should try reading to answer your own questions.

The decision prohibits a prosecutor from introducing testimony or evidence related to a president pardoning a person while at the same time receiving a bribe. Sure, you can normally prosecute the payment/quid aspect. But the prosecutor can't allow testimony from the president, his allies, or other evidence about the pardoning aspect.

So if you're sitting on a jury, you can hear all about the payment/quid aspect, but you will have no way to link that to the pardoning aspect since the prosecutor, as Coney Barrett (one of trump's justices) said, is "hamstrung" from doing that.

It's absurd.
 
You should try reading to answer your own questions.

The decision prohibits a prosecutor from introducing testimony or evidence related to a president pardoning a person while at the same time receiving a bribe. Sure, you can normally prosecute the payment/quid aspect. But the prosecutor can't allow testimony from the president, his allies, or other evidence about the pardoning aspect.

So if you're sitting on a jury, you can hear all about the payment/quid aspect, but you will have no way to link that to the pardoning aspect since the prosecutor, as Coney Barrett (one of trump's justices) said, is "hamstrung" from doing that.

It's absurd.

Wrong. Like the bleating soldier you are, you're falling for the left's fear mongering.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
You should try reading to answer your own questions.

The decision prohibits a prosecutor from introducing testimony or evidence related to a president pardoning a person while at the same time receiving a bribe. Sure, you can normally prosecute the payment/quid aspect. But the prosecutor can't allow testimony from the president, his allies, or other evidence about the pardoning aspect.

So if you're sitting on a jury, you can hear all about the payment/quid aspect, but you will have no way to link that to the pardoning aspect since the prosecutor, as Coney Barrett (one of trump's justices) said, is "hamstrung" from doing that.

It's absurd.

Stop being a pussy

Chief Justice John Roberts chided the liberal justices for 'fear mongering'

Justices claim immunity ruling allows presidents to poison staff, have Navy SEALs kill political rivals

 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
Stop being a pussy

Chief Justice John Roberts chided the liberal justices for 'fear mongering'

Justices claim immunity ruling allows presidents to poison staff, have Navy SEALs kill political rivals

This tells you where the liberals minds are as it relates to their political rivals doesn't it? Is there any doubt about what they claim a president (from their rival party) will/would do, is exactly what they will do.
 
Stop being a pussy

Chief Justice John Roberts chided the liberal justices for 'fear mongering'

Justices claim immunity ruling allows presidents to poison staff, have Navy SEALs kill political rivals

Liberal justices? Moron, one of your own spoke out against it. Why are you and Roberts ignoring that? Stop getting all of your news from one source - especially one that has recently had to admit multiple times that they purposely misreport things - and you won't look so dumb.
 
Liberal justices? Moron, one of your own spoke out against it. Why are you and Roberts ignoring that? Stop getting all of your news from one source - especially one that has recently had to admit multiple times that they purposely misreport things - and you won't look so dumb.

All of that and you're still wrong. Kills you doesn't it?

Pussy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WVUSerg and 19MU88
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT