At least six of those seven schools have better football facilities, so your "amazing" comment really doesn't amount to much comparing to those schools.
Now, if you want to look at schools with similar budgets, then fine. But listing a bunch of schools that have bigger budgets and better facilities doesn't prove anything. Further, there are two important aspects you are misrepresenting in looking at football facilities. One, you are trying to compare football facilities of schools in relation to their budget. But those budget numbers you are looking at includes all sports spending. It isn't just football spending. Also, many schools sponsor more sports than we do. So, you can say "look, our budget is lower than Towson's, yet we have a lot better football facilities so that is amazing." In reality, Towson sponsors three more sports than Marshall, so their expenses probably will be more.
To logically reach the conclusion you are trying to, it would be important to either 1) look at the football budgets instead of the overall budget or at least 2) compare the budgets and number of sports each school sponsors.