You don't have the ability to ever find "flaws" in my work. Here, let me help you . . . and for everyone else that has read this thread and hasn't noticed BC's horrendous reading comprehension and straw men, please take the time to actually process what you're reading:
Show me anywhere in my two posts in this thread where I claimed that inflation was the result of the tax cuts. Fvck, show where I even remotely alluded to that. You can't. Why can't you? Because I fvcking didn't. In fact, I very cleary stated that "Deplorables don't realize that the tax cuts cheeto keeps pumping actually are meaningless when his
OTHER economic policies make them pay more money."
Do you have any idea what "other" means? That statement clearly shows that it is cheeto's OTHER economic policies that are causing the inflation and making people pay more.
GOD DAMMIT: I AM SO FVCKING SICK OF HAVING TO DUMB THINGS DOWN ON THIS BOARD AND REPEATEDLY GO OVER THINGS BECAUSE PEOPLE LACK BASIC READING COMPREHENSION. Once again, this isn't the case of poor writing, ambigious language being used, or me not being articulate enough. The statement very clearly blames cheeto's "other economic policies" for why they are paying more than they are saving with the tax cuts.
Here is the statement again for you
. . . "Deplorables (also know as the 'we love the uneducated' crowd) don't realize that the tax cuts cheeto keeps pumping actually are meaningless when his other economic policies make them pay more money."
@ohio herd , since you liked BC's post, maybe you can explain how the both of you can be so fvcking dense to totally create and support straw men like that against me?
A family of four in Omaha making $50,000 is considered middle class. A family of four in Omaha making $150,000 is also considered middle class. All other things equal, those incomes allow for far different lifestyles even though both are considered middle class.
Even though both are considered middle class, the tax savings for both would be significantly different. Hence, I couldn't accurately put a number down to represent tax savings for the middle class since there are so many variables in what goes into that. So, yes, $1500 was just a number. The $250 took about ten more seconds of thinking to come up with. I don't pay attention to prices much, but I know that gas has gone up about $.45/gallon over the last handful of months. Assuming a husband and wife each fill up once per week, that means they are spending $80 more per month just on gas. That's nearly $1000 more per year in just additional fuel costs. Now, you don't think inflation will account for an additional thousand or two, at least, for an entire year?
The point remains the same; the uneducated, who cheeto has an overwhelming number of, aren't intelligent enough to realize that tax cuts could easily be offset by inflation costs . . . due to "HIS OTHER ECONOMIC POLICIES."
I can't help it that I am far more well-rounded on numerous topics than you are. You also fail to acknowledge that I spent nearly a decade in the private sector including being a director of a division/partner in a company that increased annual revenue from $25 million to nearly $45 million in my five years there.
Everything I touch turns to gold . . . well, except for music records. Those tend to turn platinum.
You're too dumb to realize - that if you read correctly - nothing I am saying is an economic lesson. Nothing I am saying - assuming you morons know how to read - is disputed. cheeto's policies have and will continue to cause inflation.
