ADVERTISEMENT

Math Help

So, why flip from core to regular if you were just "clarifying"?

Because “core” doesn’t include prices of food or energy...the various things you introduced and claimed “policies” were inflating.

And you’re worried about 1 month data of 2.8%?? Pffft.

In 2011, 6 consecutive months of +3.5%. Where was your concern over “inflation policy”?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
Because “core” doesn’t include prices of food or energy...the various things you introduced and claimed “policies” were inflating.

This is you once again being a liar. I discussed food and energy inflation in my very first post - the original post of this thread. After that, you were the one who selected to use core inflation. Of course, you presented bogus figures on that which I have called you out on.

Now, you're claiming that the only reason you're using regular inflation is because I introduced food and/or energy? In that case, why did you ever use core considering my introduction of food/energy was in the very first post.

Face it . . . you're not only a moron, but you're also an habitual liar. You once again presented false information, then when confronted on it, you tried changing the type of statistic entirely. When asked why you changed it, your excuse made no fvcking sense since my very first post included things (food/energy) that your first statistic excludes.

As I said many posts ago, you either have no clue what you're talking about when it comes to core inflation versus regular inflation (which I believe was the case before you just read up on it) or you're a habitual liar, which I believe also is playing a major part in why you keep switching, presenting false statistics, and making illogical claims.
 
Does Rifle prefer policies that cause deflation?? Still a question he won’t answer.

You have lost all respect from me to answer any of your questions.

You were outed as the biggest liar on the board recently. You have done nothing but lie in this thread. When called out on it, you double-down on your lies and make excuses for your original lie with yet another lie.
 
I discussed food and energy inflation in my very first post - the original post of this thread

Which now actually appear to be worse in 2011 (Obama presidency) than Trump’s currently......where was your concern over “inflationary policies” during that time?

Talk about “failed assertion/argument/logic”

You have lost all respect from me to answer any of your questions.

Someone quick to call others cowards wont back up his own assertions when asked. Not shocking. You opened the door to supporting deflation as a preferred “presidential policy”. We understand why you won’t stand by it now. (Because it’s a stupid position to have)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
Talk about “failed assertion/argument/logic”



Someone quick to call others cowards wont back up his own assertions when asked. Not shocking. You opened the door to supporting deflation as a preferred “presidential policy”. We understand why you won’t stand by it now. (Because it’s a stupid position to have)

This is why you're mocked. You keep making a claim about my "assertion." My assertion had nothing to do with inflation or deflation. It had to do with cheeto's economic policies causing people to pay more than they may even save with the tax cuts.

Are you going to try explaining any of your bogus stats, flipping stats after being called out on them being bogus, or your lies?
 
Exactly. (Aka, INFLATION).

Or are you now admitting you didn’t know what “inflation” means after you used it in your assertion?

But that isn't my assertion, moron. Inflation is taking place. Everyone knows that. That isn't in debate. The assertion was that people could be paying more than they save from the tax cuts. That is what is being debated (see the rest of the thread for proof of that).

Now, are you going to keep running away for why you lied in this thread?
 
man, I haven’t seen a leftist get ass whipped like this in here since Cuntry.

it’s really pathetic
 
But that isn't my assertion, moron. Inflation is taking place. Everyone knows that. That isn't in debate. The assertion was that people could be paying more than they save from the tax cuts. That is what is being debated (see the rest of the thread for proof of that).

Liar.

Everyone here knows your assertion was trying to link inflation (rates) to Trump tax decreases and other policy. After seeing actual inflation rates were higher at points during the last president's administration (reminder: a president that also allowed tax rates to go higher); it's even more evident you're a hypocrite. You had no such concern over "policy" or other cost of goods/tax increases on the avg. guy back then.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88




donald-trumps-hole-1-tee-shot-at-the-2012-att-national-pro-am.gif


NIXRgzc.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio herd
But that isn't my assertion, moron. Inflation is taking place. Everyone knows that. That isn't in debate. The assertion was that people could be paying more than they save from the tax cuts. That is what is being debated (see the rest of the thread for proof of that).

Now, are you going to keep running away for why you lied in this thread?

I'll bite. What specific economic policies has Trump enacted that have increased inflation? Links?
 
Everyone here knows your assertion was trying to link inflation (rates) to Trump tax decreases and other policy.

Yes to other policy. No to tax decreases. I couldn't have made that any more obvious with my next post just an hour later. Again, reading comprehension.


After seeing actual inflation rates were higher at points during the last president's administration (reminder: a president that also allowed tax rates to go higher); it's even more evident you're a hypocrite. You had no such concern over "policy" or other cost of goods/tax increases on the avg. guy back then.


People weren't going around claiming that they were saving so much money by a new tax cut during Obama's administration, so the comment wouldn't have made sense. If people were applauding Obama for saving them money over tax breaks but not acknowledging that his other economic policies helped push higher inflation, it would have made sense to make the comment. But that didn't take place. This isn't rocket science.

Now, are you ever going to answer the questions I have asked you numerous times or are you smart enough to avoid them since they keep exposing more of your lies?
 
People weren't going around claiming that they were saving so much money by a new tax cut during Obama's administration, so the comment wouldn't have made sense. If people were applauding Obama for saving them money over tax breaks but not acknowledging that his other economic policies helped push higher inflation, it would have made sense to make the comment. But that didn't take place. —-Rifle

Of course it’s not rocket science that people weren’t applauding “Obama’s policies” that: increased their taxes, saw 6 consecutive months of higher inflation, and experienced higher avg per gallon gas prices than we are currently seeing compared to “Trump policy”.

Everything you’ve just admitted about “Obama Policy” and the data shown thus far shows exactly why people are actually probably “saving” more $$$ now than before.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
Of course it’s not rocket science that people weren’t applauding “Obama’s policies” that: increased their taxes, saw 6 consecutive months of higher inflation, and experienced higher avg per gallon gas prices than we are currently seeing compared to “Trump policy”.

.

Exactly. Hence there wasn’t reason to make the same comment, which was in response to your hypocrite claim.

My god, you can’t even follow your own words.

actually probably .

Actually probably? Well, which one is it? They actually are or probably are?

So the experts at lunch allow you to talk? If so, is it just for their own entertainment like we did when we’d ask Fever questions on here just to hear how stupid he’d sound?

Still refusing to answer the questions about your lies?
 
Exactly... you understand what inflation is now? Or, exactly...you just figured out that the basis for you creating this thread has no merit?

You make no sense.

Are you still a coward who refuses to acknowledge and discuss your lies, bogus statistics, switching what statistic you wanted to look at, and more lies in this thread?

We already know the answer to that, liarherdfan.
 
Exactly....you prefer a deflationary economic policy?? Exactly...Obama’s “inflation policy” hit levels higher than Trumps??? Or....exactly....you still can’t name a single specific Trump policy that has increased inflation to the level of Obama’s (while you said nothing)????
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
Exactly....you prefer a deflationary economic policy?? Exactly...Obama’s “inflation policy” hit levels higher than Trumps??? Or....exactly....you still can’t name a single specific Trump policy that has increased inflation to the level of Obama’s (while you said nothing)????

I’ll answer those as soon as you stop being a coward and answer the questions I have repeatedly asked you.

Why do you keep hiding, liar?

boom roasted

Do you ever get tired of being a cheerleader? Do you ever wish you could make a post that people actually didn’t laugh at you about, dork?
 
I’ll answer those as soon as you stop being a coward and answer the questions I have repeatedly asked you.

Why do you keep hiding, liar?



Do you ever get tired of being a cheerleader? Do you ever wish you could make a post that people actually didn’t laugh at you about, dork?

do you ever get tired of being a fraud? slow night playboy? some day you will be the debater you want to be. rule #1 name call you lose. pathetic
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT