Let’s remember that rifle thought a reverse 1 for 10 stock split was beneficial for him and that his stock was increasing 10 fold in value.
Why lie? That wasn't the issue. The question was if a reverse stock would do more than double the stock - if it usually led to a quick surge above and beyond the natural increase based on the reduction of stock.
I’m not changing any discussion. For 15 years we have been discussing economics, politics, finance on this board. You rightfully abstained because you didn’t fully understand those subject, so you corrected peoples’ spelling and grammar, told us about all the pussy you were getting and stuck to other midwit subjects that you fully understood.
Middle-Class Murox, I built this board. Prior to me, it was a bunch of polite bullshit talk. Before me, nobody dared to say something as benign as "Christianity is a fraud," refer to gods as "comic book superheroes," etc. The former board owner sent me multiple messages telling me that I was causing a ruckus due to questioning Christianity on here since it was such a conservative board.
Can you imagine that? This board was so conservative that you couldn't even question Christianity before I came alone and completely changed the dynamics of the board. And like usual, a couple of years down the road, you started riding my coattails and copying me by suddenly expressing similar views on religion.
I abstained from political talk? I was a poly sci major. I would run circles around you based on political theory, political history, world politics, and U.S. political structure. I will get on a three-way video call with you right now with BC as the judge and be able to rattle off more world leaders of each country on a 3-to-1 ratio over you. You can't even name 2/3 of the Supreme Court. And I am willing to put up $10k on any test like that against you, Middle-Class Murox.
Economics? Yes, I abstained from those discussions. Unlike you, I know what my strengths and weaknesses are. Am I well versed on infectious diseases? No. But I am wise enough to know who is and where to get that information. On the other hand, your confirmation bias has led you to think you're an expert by reading bogus information that evolves out of Qanon chats.
It's why you continue to be a coward and won't defend your claim: "Through 9 months we are on pace for the highest all-cause mortality in 30 years."
Just like the last time you made a related bogus claim, you got called out on it, then you hid. You're a blowhard and a fvcking pussy who is afraid to admit that you have no clue what you're talking about and continue to spout bullshit with no true data. Hell, remember the last time you tried it about electricity costs in Europe? You got demolished. Hell, your own source was off on his math by about 10x.
Stop hiding, pussy. Support your claim: "Through 9 months we are on pace for the highest all-cause mortality in 30 years." All you have to do is show the data.