Name any accomplishment of Hillary Clinton please!
- Thread starter ohio herd
- Start date
And I'll interpret your nonsense. "I either didn't read the link provided by extra, or I didn't like what I read, so I'll change the subject.
Looking at page 18 looks like 2 line items are money going directly to charity.
Direct program expenditures -- approx. 33.7 mil
UNIT AID commodities expense -- about 14.2 mil
That totals 47.9 mil of 248.2 mil collected That is less than 20% collected that actually helps someone. not a very high percentage. How much went it the Clinton's pocket I have no idea. I would bet 20% of collections to a charity going to actually help people is not a number that would be high on the list of effective charitable organizations.
And before anyone says there are costs to running a charity, I agree, but 80% of the money seems a little high to me.
Direct program expenditures -- approx. 33.7 mil
UNIT AID commodities expense -- about 14.2 mil
That totals 47.9 mil of 248.2 mil collected That is less than 20% collected that actually helps someone. not a very high percentage. How much went it the Clinton's pocket I have no idea. I would bet 20% of collections to a charity going to actually help people is not a number that would be high on the list of effective charitable organizations.
And before anyone says there are costs to running a charity, I agree, but 80% of the money seems a little high to me.
You should have used the link I provided. Here, I'll give it again
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/06/where-does-clinton-foundation-money-go/
This charity is a money laundering entity for the world's corrupt. For which the Clinton's take a nice commission.
Clinton Development Initiative staff in Africa train rural farmers and help them get access to seeds, equipment and markets for their crops.
All of which costs nickels and pennies in Africa. How many are actually on these "staffs"? Interesting that a majority of this money ends up in Africa.......where it really can never be accounted for. Hell most of the Aids/HIV therapies alone are already donated to Africa by the manufacturers.
MONEY LAUNDERING..........
- Clinton Climate Initiative staff help governments in Africa and the Caribbean region with reforestation efforts, and in island nations to help develop renewable energy projects.
- Staff at the Clinton Health Access Initiative, an independent, affiliated entity, work in dozens of nations to lower the cost of HIV/AIDS medicine, scale up pediatric AIDS treatment and promote treatment of diarrhea through life-saving Zinc/ORS treatment.
- Clinton Health Matters staff work with local governments and businesses in the United States to develop wellness and physical activity plans.
All of which costs nickels and pennies in Africa. How many are actually on these "staffs"? Interesting that a majority of this money ends up in Africa.......where it really can never be accounted for. Hell most of the Aids/HIV therapies alone are already donated to Africa by the manufacturers.
MONEY LAUNDERING..........
watch the Clinton Cash video and pay particular attention to the parts about the Nigerian government. that is why this stuff is "going" to Africa. their buddies over there can account for anything they want to say...
Eh, that 20% is better than what the tea party PACs did with their money. Pick your poison: launder money from the rich or steal it from the elderly and white poor.
"Daniel Borochoff, president and founder of CharityWatch, told us by phone that its analysis of the finances of the Clinton Foundation and its affiliates found that about 89 percent of the foundation budget is spent on programming (or “charity”), higher than the 75 percent considered the industry standard."
You should have used the link I provided. Here, I'll give it again
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/06/where-does-clinton-foundation-money-go/
You should have used the link I provided. Here, I'll give it again
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/06/where-does-clinton-foundation-money-go/
Borochoff is on the take... pure and simple.
"30% of the ENTIRE CharityWatch budget went directly to Mr. Borochoff. Additional benefits brought his total income to more than $1.3 million..."
"You accounted for $2,611 in parking fees as program services in 2012."
"It’s extremely rare for a Wikipedia user to get blocked from adding or editing page content. Yet apparently they blocked you for lack of neutrality, as well as inappropriate self-promotion of both your organization and yourself."
http://charity-news.org/index.php/open-questions-for-daniel-borochoff/
Yeah, like the Clintons can't influence the review. It's why the other group issued an avoid stamp only to back off and then just say they weren't going to rate them.
just imagine having a job in which you "rate" charities... now image you earn $1.3 million doing so.............
Of course you would. You can create a T-shirt with her face on it and a caption under it that says, "I put my noodle in a golden doodle! Go Chelsea!"
I don't see that big a difference here. It's all rich lawyers and business people getting richer off politics. It's a dirty game for most involved.
charitable foundation industry was born out of govts failure to provide unsustainable financial promises and a convoluted tax code hell bent on reducing productivity.
Ok, so let's go with CHARITY NAVIGATOR.
"We spoke by phone with Sandra Minuitti at Charity Navigator, and she told us Charity Navigator decided not to rate the Clinton Foundation because the foundation spun off some entities (chiefly the Health Access Initiative) and then later brought some, like the Clinton Global Initiative, back into the fold. Charity Navigator looks at a charity’s performance over time, she said, and those spin-offs could result in a skewed picture using its analysis model. If the foundation maintains its current structure for several years, she said, Charity Navigator will be able to rate it again.....
....She referred us to page 10 of the 2013 990 form for the Clinton Foundation. When considering the amount spent on “charitable work,” she said, one would look not just at the amount in grants given to other charities, but all of the expenses in Column B for program services. That comes to 80.6 percent of spending. (The higher 89 percent figure we cited earlier comes from a CharityWatch analysis of the Clinton Foundation AND its affiliates.)
This statement alone should be flying the red flags of money laundering. They essentially eliminated the entity that actually provided all that HIV care to dying Africans.
Yep. Why would they spin off one of their major initiatives? Did they all of a sudden not care about aids in Africa anymore? One might surmise that it's akin to companies that are constantly opening and closing shell companies, changing their business, reverse mergers, etc. You see a lot of that on the Vancouver exchange, the world wide home to penny stock scams.
Hey wait, just so happens that one of the foundations largest donors is a billionaire who made his money running penny stock scams in Vancouver. What a weird coincidence.
Hey wait, just so happens that one of the foundations largest donors is a billionaire who made his money running penny stock scams in Vancouver. What a weird coincidence.
Completely agree. Saddam kept Iran in check, even in post gulf war, now look at the instability after he was taken from power. I have always said that it takes evil in that region to control the other evils. He nor Gaddafi tolerated terrorism in their country, they were ruthless about it and kept them out. Some places just aren't meant for democracy.
Yep, and to add to the instability, completely turn his back on Israel, one of two countries (Saudi) that could deter Iran. If we abandon them completely, that region will ignite WW3 and Israel having to defend themselves, with Russian interests going up against US interest since Russia has so much influence there.
I don't know, tell us how blind you are. Yeah, I'm serious.
BTW, still waiting on that link, environmental science guy.
That's because no such information backs your ridiculous statement, Captain Environment.
Mr. you need a link, there is no point in arguing with you, you have no experience or education in the field. That's like hiring a painter to be a lawyer just because they think they know the law. Doesn't matter what you think or what internet site you go to, it doesn't make you any more intelligent than you think you are. What's more ridiculous is you are taking an estimation and using it as a fact. Fact is they can't measure a large event. End of story.
Just to show you yet another example of how we really don't know how much CO2 or other gases are released by volcanoes, well here ya go. They even admit that the estimation changes every decade when they begin to find out more. Now argue that..
http://www.livescience.com/40451-volcanic-co2-levels-are-staggering.html
http://www.livescience.com/40451-volcanic-co2-levels-are-staggering.html
Correct, there is no arguing your point, which is why you haven't provided a link to back up your statement. YOU are the one who said that one volcanic eruption produces more emissions than mankind in all it's history. Evidently you paid way to much for your education, because it didn't take.
Funny thing is, all you do is point out one little thing that someone saying in a fairly diverse and large subject and poke at it while missing the entire discussion. Some people I swear always trying to skate uphill. It isn't just this CO2 thing, its anything anyone brings up. Grand scheme of things, I am right about C02, so is rockdog, in saying humans aren't as omnipotent as lefty's always want us to believe. Olen is right about illegal immigrants. You and datard are the only ones with out there ideas and arguing dumb ass points instead of the discussion. I am stopping with this, I hope you get a life and stop thinking you are spiderman.............
If you're going to hope, hope that someone donates you another brain cell so that once in a while something might click, just by pure coincidence.
Last edited:
