ADVERTISEMENT

No wonder Herdman is so anal today

herdfan06

Platinum Buffalo
Feb 3, 2007
39,912
5,475
113
Porn site xHamster blocks North Carolina users to protest anti-LGBT law

North Carolina has faced widespread outrage after passing a law that requires transgender people to use public restrooms based on the genders listed on their birth certificates, while also prohibiting new anti-discrimination protections for the LGBT community from being passed. Several companies and entertainers have already pledged to boycott North Carolina, and there's now one more to add to the list: the porn website xHamster, which is blocking users in the state from viewing porn until the controversial law is repealed.

As reported by The Huffington Post, North Carolina visitors to the popular site were met with a black screen early Monday afternoon, which xHamster plans to replace with a petition to repeal the law, a spokesperson for the site told the Post.

"We have spent the last 50 years fighting for equality for everyone and these laws are discriminatory which xHamster.com does not tolerate," the spokesperson said in a statement to the Post. "Judging by the stats of what you North Carolinians watch, we feel this punishment is a severe one. We will not standby and pump revenue into a system that promotes this type of garbage. We respect all sexualities and embrace them."

Boycotts have proven to be a popular form of protest against the legislation, with Bruce Springsteen recently canceling a concert in the state to protest the law and PayPal ending its plans to open a global operations center. But although the technique is often used for purposes such as copyright protection, denying users content in the United States as a form of political protest is something seen far less often.
http://www.theverge.com/2016/4/11/11410956/porn-site-xhamster-north-carolina-block
http://www.theverge.com/2016/4/11/11410956/porn-site-xhamster-north-carolina-block
 
Most people really don't understand what NC did(Bruce Springstein). They had to do something.

Who wants a man shitting, pissing, and being in the bathroom with women? Who wants their wife or daughter to go the Y and some freak man can be in the shower or locker room?

The idiots down in Charlotte forced the state's hand.

Bruce Springstein can go back to where he came from. He is an idiot. Play your music and shut your pie hole.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mufan08
Most people really don't understand what NC did(Bruce Springstein). They had to do something.

Who wants a man shitting, pissing, and being in the bathroom with women? Who wants their wife or daughter to go the Y and some freak man can be in the shower or locker room?

The idiots down in Charlotte forced the state's hand.

Bruce Springstein can go back to where he came from. He is an idiot. Play your music and shut your pie hole.

That's exactly what he did. Took his ball and went home. Free market.
 
Most people really don't understand what NC did(Bruce Springstein). They had to do something.

Who wants a man shitting, pissing, and being in the bathroom with women? Who wants their wife or daughter to go the Y and some freak man can be in the shower or locker room?

The idiots down in Charlotte forced the state's hand.

Bruce Springstein can go back to where he came from. He is an idiot. Play your music and shut your pie hole.

just use the bathroom and shut your pie hole.
 
I will. The men's room where men(guys with a pecker) should go.
I'm bet your wife has squated beside more peckers than you realize.

Transsexual man walks into a female bathroom (looking better than half the women in there), goes into a stall, and pulls his pecker out with plenty of women & children in there. Happens every day.


...or would you like a police officer giving everyone a little crotch grab in front of the female restroom facility to make sure everyone is going where they need to go?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raoul Duke MU
I'm bet your wife has squated beside more peckers than you realize.

Transsexual man walks into a female bathroom (looking better than half the women in there), goes into a stall, and pulls his pecker out with plenty of women & children in there. Happens every day.


...or would you like a police officer giving everyone a little crotch grab in front of the female restroom facility to make sure everyone is going where they need to go?

that's what's funny about the whole bill, how do you remotely police it? herdman's wife going to be peeking over the stalls to make sure others in there have a va-jay-jay then dial 911 if they don't?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raoul Duke MU
I'm bet your wife has squated beside more peckers than you realize.

Transsexual man walks into a female bathroom (looking better than half the women in there), goes into a stall, and pulls his pecker out with plenty of women & children in there. Happens every day.

Now there will be FtoM trans, looking totally like dudes, using the women's john in NC. So you all banned something "creepy" to make something even more "creepy" happen. Idiots.
 
Now there will be FtoM trans, looking totally like dudes, using the women's john in NC. So you all banned something "creepy" to make something even more "creepy" happen. Idiots.
Yes. Instead of that FtoM transsexual (who is probably more likely to enjoy the female anatomy) going into the male restroom and looking (or not) at young boys, they're going to be in there looking young girls.


The free market, "government never works" people are often quick to legislate social activity.

And any unwanted sexual offense is an unwanted sexual offense, no matter what the creep has between their legs or what they should have between their legs based on their appearance. Unwanted dick on dick, dick on clit, clit on dick, or clit on clit action harms the mind more than it harms the body. It's about power. Creeps are creeps, no matter what restroom they use.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Raoul Duke MU
I'm bet your wife has squated beside more peckers than you realize.

Transsexual man walks into a female bathroom (looking better than half the women in there), goes into a stall, and pulls his pecker out with plenty of women & children in there. Happens every day.


...or would you like a police officer giving everyone a little crotch grab in front of the female restroom facility to make sure everyone is going where they need to go?

So how many transgenders do you think there are?

And, so what if that happens then why should it be made the "right thing to do"
 


He's doing the same thing as PayPal. I guess you will ecuse paypal since they employ people.

Nope paypal is a hypocrite, just like you. They have business locations in Singapore(maybe other places) that lock queers up.
 
Nope paypal is a hypocrite, just like you. They have business locations in Singapore(maybe other places) that lock queers up.

Nope, North Carolina is an idiot like you. There have been a total of 9 people convicted under Singapore LGBT laws in 6 years.
 
Nope, North Carolina is an idiot like you. There have been a total of 9 people convicted under Singapore LGBT laws in 6 years.

So that makes it right? LMAO

How may people have been convicted of being gay in NC? You don't even know what the NC law is about.
 
So that makes it right? LMAO

How may people have been convicted of being gay in NC? You don't even know what the NC law is about.

Sorry, I thought that the "g" in lgbt stood for gay. I also thought the law in NC was about transgenders, but you start talking about gays in Singapore.
 
As someone who generally supports specific gay rights/privileges....someone is going to have to explain to me why a law that requires someone with a specific gender genetic makeup, use public toilets designated for their gender be considered "discrimination". In fact, there is nothing discriminating about it. Otherwise, what is to stop any man from walking into a women's restroom at anytime claiming the same "discrimination" that he too has a right to use whatever public restroom he wishes.

The whole "how do you police it" argument is as lazy argument against the law as I've read anywhere.
 
As someone who generally supports specific gay rights/privileges....someone is going to have to explain to me why a law that requires someone with a specific gender genetic makeup, use public toilets designated for their gender be considered "discrimination". In fact, there is nothing discriminating about it. Otherwise, what is to stop any man from walking into a women's restroom at anytime claiming the same "discrimination" that he too has a right to use whatever public restroom he wishes.

The whole "how do you police it" argument is as lazy argument against the law as I've read anywhere.

My point exactly. Folks like greed are reading the headlines and not looking at what happened.
 
My point exactly. Folks like greed are reading the headlines and not looking at what happened.

It has absolutely nothing to do with headlines. You whined as usual about an individual (Springsteen) exercising his right to not do business in NC while being silent about a corporation doing the same thing.
 
I was hoping some of the "Legal scholars" on here would answer my question. So I'll ask again.

How is a law that requires an individual with a specific gender genetic makeup, use a public restroom with that gender genetic makeup...discriminatory? Anyone?

"Discrimination" has become such a dumbed down liberal buzzword that no one seems to have the slightest idea what "REAL" discrimination is anymore. Everyone seems so desiring to be labeled a victim of something that actual logic is ignored.

(Never liked Springsteen anyway. No loss on my part)
 
I don't give a shit if it is discrimination or not. Like I said, they went and opened a whole other can of worms, so they are dumbasses.

Pervs and predators come in all gender and sexual flavors. Let the laws already on the books deal with them as needed.

And if I really have to piss or crap and a dude is taking forever in the men's john at the gas station I am still going to use the women's john if it is empty. I am not going to shit my pants because of a dumb law.
 
I don't give a shit if it is discrimination or not. Like I said, they went and opened a whole other can of worms, so they are dumbasses.

Pervs and predators come in all gender and sexual flavors. Let the laws already on the books deal with them as needed.

And if I really have to piss or crap and a dude is taking forever in the men's john at the gas station I am still going to use the women's john if it is empty. I am not going to shit my pants because of a dumb law.

Cool. The non answer I fully expected from "constitutional intellects".

The debate going on doesn't matter that you "don't give a shit". The debate deals with the "feel good" "fairness utopians" saying this law is illegal discrimination against "men" and "women".

So...again....How is a law requiring genetically endowed men to use a legally designated public toilet for genetically endowed men (and vice versa for women) an illegal form of discrimination?
 
Cool. The non answer I fully expected from "constitutional intellects"

And that's the answer I would expect from someone that thinks every law passed requires some great Constitutional debate. Which makes you no smarter than the ones crying discrimination. This one just takes some common sense and thinking about the real reason it was proposed and passed: just to be assholes.
 
It's all about the Religious Right Wing-nuts and ignorant people who have no understanding of what Transgender actually means.

Not to mention the US obsession with bathrooms.....I travelled all over Europe and in many countries there is only one restroom in public areas.......You'd go in and see dudes pissing in the urinals (Or sometimes just a drain) and chicks in the stalls......Men and women washing their hands side by side and no one batted an eye......Except of course the US tourists.

Maybe we should write a law banning Priests, Youth Ministers, Wrestling & Football Coaches from using public bathrooms at all.

Hell, the Mississippi Law is worse.....It's straight out discrimination.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raoul Duke MU
And that's the answer I would expect from someone that thinks every law passed requires some great Constitutional debate. Which makes you no smarter than the ones crying discrimination. This one just takes some common sense and thinking about the real reason it was proposed and passed: just to be assholes.

I don't think it requires a "constitutional debate". That's the fvcking point to my question.

Honestly, most laws are passed "just to be assholes" on some level. Get over it.
 
It has absolutely nothing to do with headlines. You whined as usual about an individual (Springsteen) exercising his right to not do business in NC while being silent about a corporation doing the same thing.
Bruce can do what he wants. He is pretty overrated anyway.
 
And that's the answer I would expect from someone that thinks every law passed requires some great Constitutional debate. Which makes you no smarter than the ones crying discrimination. This one just takes some common sense and thinking about the real reason it was proposed and passed: just to be assholes.

It was passed because of what the city of Charlotte did.
 
It's all about the Religious Right Wing-nuts and ignorant people who have no understanding of what Transgender actually means.

Not to mention the US obsession with bathrooms.....I travelled all over Europe and in many countries there is only one restroom in public areas.......You'd go in and see dudes pissing in the urinals (Or sometimes just a drain) and chicks in the stalls......Men and women washing their hands side by side and no one batted an eye......Except of course the US tourists.

Maybe we should write a law banning Priests, Youth Ministers, Wrestling & Football Coaches from using public bathrooms at all.

Hell, the Mississippi Law is worse.....It's straight out discrimination.

Let's pattern ourselves after Europe. The home of two world wars, ethnic cleansing, and failed economic utopias.

We have had men's and women's rooms in this country for decades and now it is an issue.

Why? Political correctness. They don't want the dude who dresses up like a woman to feel left out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
Yet you support this law. The real reason you asked your question is so you can wag your fingers at those opposed to it.

Would you shit or Piss your pants because of a law? Answer that question.

Would you want your daughter in a bathroom with men? How about the locker at the Y or school?
 
Yet you support this law. The real reason you asked your question is so you can wag your fingers at those opposed to it.

Would you shit or Piss your pants because of a law? Answer that question.

Lmao. It's not finger wagging. It's asking a basic question related to "discrimination" and what it actually is/isn't. Not whether you choose to shit or piss your pants in an emergency situation.

Still no one answering the question......not surprised.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT