Palestinian reactions to Queers for Gaza

[Raoul Duke MU]

More liberal propaganda that you're selling???

HIV was cross-over, especially in the black community, mainly because of "down-low" sex and shared needles (and the rape of female virgins in certain countries) but we're not supposed to say that...

Fast Facts: HIV in the United States

Information and data on HIV in the United States.

www.cdc.gov

"HIV infections among gay, bisexual, and other men who reported male-to-male sexual contact. In 2021, gay, bisexual, and other men who reported male-to-male sexual contact accounted for 70% (22,400) of the 32,100 estimated new HIV infections and 86% of estimated infections among all men."

But yeah you're correct. I'm a moron and you're a "libertarian"...

The USA is the only nation in the world?

"Globally, heterosexual transmission is the major route of disease spread."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ar...osexual transmission is the,1982 and 1987 (6).

 

[riflearm2]

I was going to add at some point the "non-homosexual" abuse of young boys in certain Islamic societies...

Father Shaughnessy, the Catholic priest at every church in the country, is avoiding this thread for a reason, moron.

If you think this is exclusive to Islam, then you’re far dumber than what the board already thinks.

 

[KyMUfan]

The USA is the only nation in the world?

"Globally, heterosexual transmission is the major route of disease spread."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3307401/#:~:text=Globally, heterosexual transmission is the,1982 and 1987 (6).

Dude... You're really stretching now...

If 90+% of the worldwide adult population is heterosexual don't you think the majority of disease is spread by them???

Likewise there are some diseases that are more symptomatic among gay males - HIV and anal cancer to name a couple.

Your reference and my response was specific to HIV.

Think for a change...

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

If 90+% of the worldwide adult population is heterosexual don't you think the majority of disease is spread by them???

Jeeze, maybe it has something to do with fvcking and bodily fluids, straight or gay.

Your reference and my response was specific to HIV.

The study I linked to is titled:

Heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus infection – Strategies for prevention​

So yes, it is specific to HIV.

Likewise there are some diseases that are more symptomatic among gay males - HIV and anal cancer to name a couple.

Because gay men cannot technically have vaginal sex with each other, and it is easier to transmit HIV via buttsecks due to microscopic anal tearing and the butthole being rich in CD4-T cells, which HIV targets. There is nothing special about a gay man's butt verses a woman's butt....both butts are equally biologically receptive to some HIV.

 

[riflearm2]

. There is nothing special about a gay man's butt verses a woman's butt....both butts are equally biologically receptive to some HIV.

He’s aware of this. It’s why KY is in his name.

 

[30CAT]

That IS bigotry you fvcking moron. It doesn't matter what your comic book says. It is bigotry to claim that homosexual is wrong and "not okay." Face it: your religion is bigoted towards both women and gays.

No it isn't, dumbass. That's like saying if you're against murder, you're a bigot.

It's not a comic book, by definition, dumbass.

I don't have to face your ignorance.

 

[30CAT]

Diseases are not spread by hetero sex?

This reminds me of people thinking HIV was just for the gays.

To steal a phrase from rifle...

"Let me dumb this down for you."

I wasn't talking about spreading a disease. I was talking about getting a disease.

A man and a woman who have never had any sexual contact, their entire lives, can have natural sex, no protection, and never get a disease.

A man and another man under the same circumstances, can catch Hepatitis by sticking one in each other's poop shoot.

Now if it was natural, why would they get a disease from it?

 

[KyMUfan]

Because gay men cannot technically have vaginal sex with each other, and it is easier to transmit HIV via buttsecks due to microscopic anal tearing and the butthole being rich in CD4-T cells, which HIV targets. There is nothing special about a gay man's butt verses a woman's butt....both butts are equally biologically receptive to some HIV.

So please tell me how HIV was introduced to the female population then...

Hmmm... Maybe like this???

HIV was cross-over, especially in the black community, mainly because of "down-low" sex and shared needles (and the rape of female virgins in certain countries) but we're not supposed to say that...

Nothing you can say will change the fact that HIV was, and primarily remains, a gay male disease since in your own words it is easier to be transmitted via anal sex. Female plumbing makes it harder for them to transmit it to each other in the same manner.

But keep trying... And keep telling yourself you're a libertarian while you're at it...

 

[riflearm2]

No it isn't, dumbass. That's like saying if you're against murder, you're a bigot.

You need to stick to things you're smart enough to discuss, such as 1+1.

The very definition of "bigot" means "unreasonably attached to a belief against a group of people" . . . it isn't unreasonable to be against people who commit murder. It is unreasonable to be against a group of people based on who they are attracted to. By definition, you're a bigot, and your religion is sexist and bigoted.

Why would you even dispute that if you truly believe the Bible?

 

[30CAT]

The very definition of "bigot" means "unreasonably attached to a belief against a group of people" . .

Such as MS-13?

And I'm not against a group of people, dumbass. I'm against sin. We are all sinners, but I'm not against us all.

 

[KyMUfan]

Such as MS-13?

And I'm not against a group of people, dumbass. I'm against sin. We are all sinners, but I'm not against us all.

Funny that the guy that is bigoted against various groups of people, including Huntingtonians, would lecture you on being a bigot...

Time is precious. Don't waste it...

 

[extragreen]

I'm against sin...as long as I'm not doing it.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

I wasn't talking about spreading a disease. I was talking about getting a disease.

If you are getting it, someone spread it. You can't go to Walmart and buy some hepatitis off the shelf.

A man and another man under the same circumstances, can catch Hepatitis by sticking one in each other's poop shoot.

If neither man has the hepatitis virus, they will just spontaneously develop hepatitis?

can have natural sex

So no blow jobs?

And who are you to tell two "traditionally" married people they can't do it in the bootie?

 

[KyMUfan]

If you are getting it, someone spread it. You can't go to Walmart and buy some hepatitis off the shelf.

Hmmm... Someone had to originally contract it unless they worked in a Wuhan lab funded in part by Fauci and the NIH...

And who are you to tell two "traditionally" married people they can't do it in the bootie?

Read the story of Sodom and Gomorrah...

You listed some reasons yesterday why the anus was vulnerable to HIV. Those same reasons are why the anus is not made for receptive sex.

And we all know you know everything about an anus because you are one yourself...

Bless your heart...

 

[extragreen]

Hmmm... Someone had to originally contract it unless they worked in a Wuhan lab funded in part by Fauci and the NIH...

The origin of covid 19 is...UNKNOWN.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

Read the story of Sodom and Gomorrah...

A fine fable.....if a gang of men want to butt-rape some man/men in your home, offer them your virgin daughters instead!

 

[30CAT]

If you are getting it, someone spread it. You can't go to Walmart and buy some hepatitis off the shelf.

If neither man has the hepatitis virus, they will just spontaneously develop hepatitis?

You can get Hepatitis from anal sex, even if neither partner has Hepatitis. Hepatitis B & C. Do your research, if you don't believe me. Again. If anal sex is natural, why can you get a disease by doing it? FYI, wearing a condom doesn't make it natural.

You can get a disease from oral sex, even if neither partner has a disease as well. Be it man on woman, woman on man, woman on woman or man on man.

A man nor a woman can get a disease from natural sex, if neither have a disease or infection. Crazy, eh?

Those are facts. So don't try to convince me that same-sex partners, having sex, is natural. It's simply not. God tells us these things for our own good. Does it mean you're going to hell? I haven't a clue. We all sin. God will be the judge. Hate the sin, not the sinner. God loves all of us. Get to know him, would be my best advice!

 

[30CAT]

if a gang of men want to butt-rape some man/men in your home, offer them your virgin daughters instead!

Actually, they did offer their virgin daughters, to no avail. They demanded the men.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

Actually, they did offer their virgin daughters, to no avail. They demanded the men.

Who the hell offers their KIDS? Lot, a Godly man!

 

[30CAT]

And who are you to tell two "traditionally" married people they can't do it in the bootie?

Forgot that comment.

To answer your question, I'm no better or worse than you or anyone. I'm not telling anyone what they can do or say.

I'm only repeating what our creator, God, has said.

If you want to go off on a man or have unnatural sex with your spouse or girlfriend, have at it. It doesn't affect me in the least. I'm just stating some facts, that's all.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

Hepatitis B & C.

Viral diseases are caused by a lack of virus?

Do your research

dO yOuR oWn rEsEaRcH

This shit never fails 🤣

So don't try to convince me that same-sex partners, having sex, is natural

I'm not trying to convince you of any such thing. I'm trying to convince you to mind your own business, and maybe read up some on how viruses work, moron....at least you finally admitted that straight sex can transmit disease, hey we are getting somewhere! Too bad WV schools failed to teach that to you.

 

[30CAT]

Who the hell offers their KIDS? Lot, a Godly man!

They were angels of God. Lot was a man of faith and he was trying to protect the angels. Do you know what happened then?

 

[30CAT]

Viral diseases are caused by a lack of virus?


dO yOuR oWn rEsEaRcH

This shit never fails 🤣

I'm not trying to convince you of any such thing. I'm trying to convince you to mind your own business, and maybe read up some on how viruses work, moron....at least you finally admitted that straight sex can transmit disease, hey we are getting somewhere! Too bad WV schools failed to teach that to you.

Now you're truly showing your ignorance. Funny you say "shit." ...Do yourself a favor and look it up. Anyone reading this thread can do a simple search and see that you're the dumbass here. Or maybe they already know.

I never denied straight sex can spread a disease. However, straight, natural sex, where neither have a disease, is safe from disease.

Mind my own business? 😂 WTF are you talking about? You and your fellow leftists are trying to force us to accept your beliefs as fact. When in fact, they are not. I do mind my own business, until someone forces their business on me. Stop teaching our kids falsities and trying to force those falsities into our lives.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

They were angels of God. Lot was a man of faith and he was trying to protect the angels. Do you know what happened then?

Next, the angels proved they didn't need protection by striking everyone blind.

This whole thing would be like you or I offering up our kids to protect the Navy Seals, with full air support at that, from some crackheads.

Funny you say "shit."

Does your poop have hep virus?

 

[30CAT]

Next, the angels proved they didn't need protection by striking everyone blind.

This whole thing would be like you or I offering up our kids to protect the Navy Seals, with full air support at that, from some crackheads.

That wasn't the point, genius.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

That wasn't the point, genius.

The point is the whole story is bullshit, and doesn't even bother to be logical.

It's a fable. And that's OK! The Bible uses many fables to tell us stuff. Neither you nor I live in a house of straw, but I'm pretty sure no pig ever built a home, much less one made of masonry.

 

[riflearm2]

They were angels of God. Lot was a man of faith and he was trying to protect the angels. Do you know what happened then?

Angels? God? What happened next?

Is this the one where a filmmaker and his crew travel to Skull Island where they encounter prehistoric creatures and capture Kong, the legendary giant gorilla, to take to New York City? Then, when Kong scales a NYC building, he saves the beautiful blonde?

 

[30CAT]

The point is the whole story is bullshit, and doesn't even bother to be logical.

It's a fable. And that's OK! The Bible uses many fables to tell us stuff. Neither you nor I live in a house of straw, but I'm pretty sure no pig ever built a home, much less one made of masonry.

Angels? God? What happened next?

Is this the one where a filmmaker and his crew travel to Skull Island where they encounter prehistoric creatures and capture Kong, the legendary giant gorilla, to take to New York City? Then, when Kong scales a NYC building, he saves the beautiful blonde?

SMH

 

[riflearm2]

SMH

Why do you disapprove of that? Do you think every story and word in the Bible is to be taken literally?

 

[30CAT]

Why do you disapprove of that? Do you think every story and word in the Bible is to be taken literally?

I think the Holy Bible is the word of God. I know there parables, as you should know, but it is accurate.

 

[extragreen]

Who the hell offers their KIDS? Lot, a Godly man!

According to the apostle Peter, Lot was a "just" man. Pretty good testimony coming from a righteous and well connected source.

It is NOT a fable and homosexuality was NOT the reason for destruction of the 2 cities. The Bible tells us the reason:

Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom, pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy.

50 And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me

 

[SamSwimmer]

 

[19MU88]

According to the apostle Peter, Lot was a "just" man. Pretty good testimony coming from a righteous and well connected source.

It is NOT a fable and homosexuality was NOT the reason for destruction of the 2 cities. The Bible tells us the reason:

Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom, pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy.

50 And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me

^^blaspheming sexual deviant with multiple religions^^

 

[extragreen]

I'm a Godless lying trumptard and trump chum addict.