Raoul, you know good and well

[mlblack16.]

process incomplete as noted by one of your side's star witnesses. are you so stupid that you cannot discern the process from the role? apparently so.

According to the Constitution, impeachment is a process, not a vote.

Impeachment as contemplated by the Constitution does not consist merely of the vote by the House, but of the process of sending the articles to the Senate for trial. Both parts are necessary to make an impeachment under the Constitution: The House must actually send the articles and send managers to the Senate to prosecute the impeachment.

If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all.

For the House to vote “to impeach” without ever sending the articles of impeachment to the Senate for trial would also deviate from the constitutional protocol. It would mean that the president had not genuinely been impeached under the Constitution; and it would also deny the president the chance to defend himself in the Senate that the Constitution provides.

the framers’ definition of impeachment assumed that impeachment was a process, not just a House vote.

Ouch, that one has got to sting.

 

[Chevy1]

What's pretty incredible...and speaks to non-partisan motives of the Constitutional lawyers who testified at the impeachment hearing:

The Dem lawyer claims there is no impeachment without conveying the articles to the Senate

The Republican lawyer says it's still an impeachment without the hand off

 

[WV-FAN]

What's pretty incredible...and speaks to non-partisan motives of the Constitutional lawyers who testified at the impeachment hearing:

The Dem lawyer claims there is no impeachment without conveying the articles to the Senate

The Republican lawyer says it's still an impeachment without the hand off

awww, stfu, we're having fun at greed's expense.

 

[herdfan429]

What's pretty incredible...and speaks to non-partisan motives of the Constitutional lawyers who testified at the impeachment hearing:

The Dem lawyer claims there is no impeachment without conveying the articles to the Senate

The Republican lawyer says it's still an impeachment without the hand off

Every single one of the lawyers were Democrats

 

[Chevy1]

Every single one of the lawyers were Democrats

Yep....but one represented the Republican POV.

Merely stating the Dem rep now sides with the Trumpublican POV.... And the Trumpublican Rep supports a more Dem POV

 

[herdfan429]

Yep....but one represented the Republican POV.

Merely stating the Dem rep now sides with the Trumpublican POV.... And the Trumpublican Rep supports a more Dem POV

Yet that’s not what you stated

 

[Chevy1]

Yet that’s not what you stated

You're picking fly shit out of pepper.

 

[extragreen]

process incomplete as noted by one of your side's star witnesses. are you so stupid that you cannot discern the process from the role? apparently so.

According to the Constitution, impeachment is a process, not a vote.

Impeachment as contemplated by the Constitution does not consist merely of the vote by the House, but of the process of sending the articles to the Senate for trial. Both parts are necessary to make an impeachment under the Constitution: The House must actually send the articles and send managers to the Senate to prosecute the impeachment.

If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all.

For the House to vote “to impeach” without ever sending the articles of impeachment to the Senate for trial would also deviate from the constitutional protocol. It would mean that the president had not genuinely been impeached under the Constitution; and it would also deny the president the chance to defend himself in the Senate that the Constitution provides.

the framers’ definition of impeachment assumed that impeachment was a process, not just a House vote.

You're still wrong.

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.
_____United States Constitution

 

[extragreen]

Ouch, that one has got to sting.

Nope. But the following does....

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.
_____United States Constitution

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

You're right, Mr. Political Scientist. I'm sure all the Dems' attorneys did not know what you clearly understand of the Constitution. They simply weren't aware of the things you claim and that's why they didn't bother using the "official" term bribery.

This process was covered by the media if you bother to dig deeper than just they impeached him. Here's an example:

https://www.rollcall.com/news/congress/house-democrats-abandon-crimes-impeachment-articles

They ARE aware of what I said about the Constitution: "There is no requirement that articles of impeachment cite specific legal codes." That's it. The rest is you being a smartass. It doesn't take a political scientist to know the percentage of people that take the time to read long-form information is low. A journalist can tell you that...and a journalist would also tell you that's why nice simple headlines are good.

The other part I mentioned, looking at Nixon's articles, yes they did that too. It's all out there on Google.

The odd thing here is my opinion is the Democrats kinda fvcked this up (because people don't read shit)....you seem to have skimmed right over that. I am bashing the Dems, the same as you, just on a different point.

You know, you can continue hoping and praying for an impeachment and removal by the Senate, but it's not happening,

When have I ever said that's going to happen? I have been clear: the only way that would happen is if some crazy deal happened where McConnell decided they have had enough of dealing with Trump. And it would take Trump dropping into the 20s in approval ratings. Then it would be a purely political thing, cutting baggage, they don't care what Trump did as long as they get their judges, tax cuts, etc. Nixon's approval ratings dropped into the mid 20s in 1974 (from a high of 66 in January '73!)....there's a lesson to be learned there.

 

[i am herdman]

They would never remove him. He has too much dirt on them all and would expose it.

 

[extragreen]

They would never remove him. He has too much dirt on them all and would expose it.

He's the orange jesus, after all.

 

[extragreen]

Quick question. Why didn't the orange jesus use all that knowledge of all the dirt to keep himself from being impeached?

 

[i am herdman]

Quick question. Why didn't the orange jesus use all that knowledge of all the dirt to keep himself from being impeached?

2nd term

 

[extragreen]

2nd term

Got it, he's saving it up for a rainy day.

 

[Chevy1]

Quick question. Why didn't the orange jesus use all that knowledge of all the dirt to keep himself from being impeached?

Hell, he got impeached trying to dig up dirt on his opponent.

 

[i am herdman]

Got it, he's saving it up for a rainy day.

Nope. He's gonna nail em.

 

[extragreen]

Nope. He's gonna nail em.

Bwaaaahaha !!! You are blinded. Absolutely blinded.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

Bwaaaahaha !!! You are blinded. Absolutely blinded.

It's literally QAnon shit.

 

[mlblack16.]

Quick question. Why didn't the orange jesus use all that knowledge of all the dirt to keep himself from being impeached?

No doubt your descendant's shouted similar questions to Jesus when they asked why He couldn't save himself after being nailed to the cross.

 

[extragreen]

No doubt your descendant's shouted similar questions to Jesus when they asked why He couldn't save himself after being nailed to the cross.

To the best of my knowledge, none of my descendants can time travel.

 

[mlblack16.]

To the best of my knowledge, none of my descendants can time travel.

So your descendants do not date back to when Christ was alive? Did you just spawn out of energy?

 

[extragreen]

So your descendants do not date back to when Christ was alive? Did you just spawn out of energy?

My DESCENDENTS would have to travel BACK in time to say anything to Christ. moron

 

[WV-FAN]

My DESCENDENTS would have to travel BACK in time to say anything to Christ. moron

 

[mlblack16.]

My DESCENDENTS would have to travel BACK in time to say anything to Christ. moron

Score is 1-1 tie. I used descendants instead of ancestors, but you SPELLED IT WRONG ANYWAY, MORON.

DESCENDANTS

So then, your ancestors yelled at and mocked Christ, asking why he didn't just save Himself, amirite?

 

[WV-FAN]

It's literally QAnon shit.

 

[WV-FAN]

Score is 1-1 tie. I used descendants instead of ancestors, but you SPELLED IT WRONG ANYWAY, MORON.

DESCENDANTS

So then, your ancestors yelled at and mocked Christ, asking why he didn't just save Himself, amirite?

 

[extragreen]

Score is 1-1 tie. I used descendants instead of ancestors, but you SPELLED IT WRONG ANYWAY, MORON.

DESCENDANTS

descendant

noun
variants: or less commonly descendent

So, no. I did not SPELL IT WRONG.

_______________________________________

So then, your ancestors yelled at and mocked Christ, asking why he didn't just save Himself, amirite?

Wasn't there, couldn't say.

But I surely am mocking anyone who thinks the liar in chief has dirt on anyone.