What is your take on all of the hype around Coach Huff and what hes done so far? Myself, I’m pretty amped about it. Care to weigh in?
rifle is my football advisor. He is not available for immediate comment as he is currently in mandatory sensitivity training per guidelines set forth by me.What is your take on all of the hype around Coach Huff and what hes done so far? Myself, I’m pretty amped about it. Care to weigh in?
What is your take on all of the hype around Coach Huff and what hes done so far? Myself, I’m pretty amped about it. Care to weigh in?
I pretty much agree with what you posted. We have no idea, at this point how much Coach Huff will be getting out in the community, etc. once spring ball & the season comes into play. Did Doc or does Dan get out in the "public view" around Huntington?I think he is doing everything right to this point. He is engaging the community, engaging former players, showing his face around town, building excitement, and being the politician that he needs to be. He is also throwing out offers to some big recruits. Even if there isn't a shot in hell in getting some off them, that builds excitement with a fan base and lets them dream for a minute. More, when those big recruits get in trouble/fail out/leave their original powerhouse school, already having built a recruiting relationship makes it easier to get them to transfer to Marshall instead of another P5.
The one concern I have, as I have mentioned before, has been some of his hires. The easiest way for a business to fail is by making bad hires, and I think some of his have been bad.
Care to elaborateI think he is doing everything right to this point. He is engaging the community, engaging former players, showing his face around town, building excitement, and being the politician that he needs to be. He is also throwing out offers to some big recruits. Even if there isn't a shot in hell in getting some off them, that builds excitement with a fan base and lets them dream for a minute. More, when those big recruits get in trouble/fail out/leave their original powerhouse school, already having built a recruiting relationship makes it easier to get them to transfer to Marshall instead of another P5.
The one concern I have, as I have mentioned before, has been some of his hires. The easiest way for a business to fail is by making bad hires, and I think some of his have been bad.
Care to elaborate
thanks, back to you.For anyone else? Sure.
For you? Nope. You’re a conniving little whiny bitch.
Would you elaborate for me? You have the on field and behind the scenes knowledge that few have here. I’m not kissing your ass, but those are just facts. If you could cast some light on this, I’d appreciate it Rifle
Trickett is the hire I was most impressed with.
Maybe he was thinking of his dadWhat makes you impressed with that hire?
Yea @ekal what about Trickett left you the most impressed? Decent hire maybe, but most impressive? You know we hired Clint and not his father Rick. Right?What makes you impressed with that hire?
I like this hire. He coached one of the top TE’s in the country two yrs ago and then was promoted to Co-Offensive coordinator. So he has experience. We didn’t hire him has a coordinator. A WR Coach is used mostly as a recruiter and Clint brings contacts from the Mississippi Jucos and Florida. I think if you read the latest QB commitment article he was being recruited by FAU. As for coaching wideouts that’s seems like a natural fit for an ex D1 QB because you spend a great deal of time practicing and understanding route running and the position. Honestly, for the position he is coaching this is a good hire imo.What makes you impressed with that hire?
A WR Coach is used mostly as a recruiter
and then was promoted to Co-Offensive coordinator. .
Well, like I said, its my impression he was brought in as a recruiter and the QB recruit we signed for 2022 only other offer was FAU(and it was Clint's position at FAU so Im sure he played a role).That's definitely not accurate. You may be thinking of a running backs coach, but even that is quite outdated. Most staffs now have full-time player personnel/off-field recruiting guys which eases the burden off of having "recruiters" as position coaches. Sure, it is important and helps, but the #1 role of a position coach is leading and teaching the room. That's especially true at a position like receiver which requires three to four of your players on the field most plays compared with a running backs coach who usually only has one guy on the field at a time to worry about.
The two easiest positions to coach on offense are running back and tight end (in most offenses). Coaching receivers is not an easy task and should not be given at the FBS level to somebody who has never played nor coached the position.
His old head coach didn't bring him along to his better job. That's not usually a good sign. His new head coach gave him a "promotion" in title, but Mehringer called the plays, not Trickett. That new head coach then let him go a year before his contract expired. The new head coach wanted Trickett gone so much that he was willing to pay him another year not to coach at FAU. Again, that's not a good sign.
Trickett was a QB. He has QB coaching experience at a JUCO. Even with the playing and previous coaching experience, his unit was very bad when he was the QB coach. He didn't do a good job coaching a position that he played and had previously coached, so you think it's a good hire to have him coach a position he has never played, never coached, and that requires three or four of those players on the field on most plays?
An inferior program in our own conference let him go with a full year left on his contract even though he was coaching a position he played and had previously coached. Marshall then hires him (from an inferior program) to coach a position he has neither played nor coached.
Again, he could end up doing fine in that role like he did with tight ends. But there's no reason to take that risk when you have far more experienced coaches who were available and willing.
Charles Huff- Head FB Coach at MarshallThat's definitely not accurate. You may be thinking of a running backs coach, but even that is quite outdated. Most staffs now have full-time player personnel/off-field recruiting guys which eases the burden off of having "recruiters" as position coaches. Sure, it is important and helps, but the #1 role of a position coach is leading and teaching the room. That's especially true at a position like receiver which requires three to four of your players on the field most plays compared with a running backs coach who usually only has one guy on the field at a time to worry about.
The two easiest positions to coach on offense are running back and tight end (in most offenses). Coaching receivers is not an easy task and should not be given at the FBS level to somebody who has never played nor coached the position.
His old head coach didn't bring him along to his better job. That's not usually a good sign. His new head coach gave him a "promotion" in title, but Mehringer called the plays, not Trickett. That new head coach then let him go a year before his contract expired. The new head coach wanted Trickett gone so much that he was willing to pay him another year not to coach at FAU. Again, that's not a good sign.
Trickett was a QB. He has QB coaching experience at a JUCO. Even with the playing and previous coaching experience, his unit was very bad when he was the QB coach. He didn't do a good job coaching a position that he played and had previously coached, so you think it's a good hire to have him coach a position he has never played, never coached, and that requires three or four of those players on the field on most plays?
An inferior program in our own conference let him go with a full year left on his contract even though he was coaching a position he played and had previously coached. Marshall then hires him (from an inferior program) to coach a position he has neither played nor coached.
Again, he could end up doing fine in that role like he did with tight ends. But there's no reason to take that risk when you have far more experienced coaches who were available and willing.
Its my understanding that politics played a role in his leaving FAU. Michael Johnson, Willie Taggart's long-time friend was hired as Co-OC and he brought his stud QB son with him(4 star recruit that was at Penn State).
Bottom line, Saban loved Clint when he was on staff at Bama,
Charles Huff- Head FB Coach at Marshall
Rifle- Out of coaching for several years
I'm backing Huff on his hires until he gives me a reason not to.
I dont think the X's and O's was the issue it was the talent at QB and that problem was solved with the hiring of a coach that could bring his son as QB. I have read in the past that Nick liked Trickett both as a player and a grad assistant(Clint started at QB against Bama one season). Do you think Huff called Nick for before hiring him? I bet so!When the QBs complete 53% of their passes for 140 yards per game, when you flip-flop between who is going to start since you can't coach any of them up, and when you're the QB coach and Co-OC, I have a hard time believing that production wasn't taken into consideration far more than politics.
Further, if he was so valuable as a recruiter, why wouldn't he have been made the TE coach since the TE coach was fired and since he had previously coached that position?
Where are you getting this information? Trickett was "on staff" at Alabama for less than 10 days as a graduate assistant. Saban fell in love with his new graduate assistant in less than 10 days while they were preparing for the national championship game?
Oh, one of the obsessors is back to make this about me instead of trying to stay on topic. Moron.