Heard a good hypothesis on the PGA Tour radio this morning. The tour and the players are trying to bring more emphasis on its two big tournaments(outside of the majors) and the players/tour are trying to get them to equal majors or trying to bring more notoriety to them. The Players Championship and Tour Championship.
The tour doesn't run the majors. Masters, British, US Open, or PGA Championship(which is run by the PGA, not the PGA Tour). They also said there is lockerroom talk among players that many of the tour players now equate pesonally winning those two right near majors. Why? Money, they rank them that way among peers, strength of field, etc.
History judges by majors. The players take in more than that. For example, who had a better career. Matt Kuchar or Orville Moody. Would you rather be Rich Beem or Rickie Fowler? Greg Norman only won 2 majors, but has 88 world wide wins and outside of Tiger Woods has the longest streak of being #1 in the world over a period of time. Where would you rank him? Behind Koepka?