Should Presidents have Full and Total Immunity

[extragreen]

Should Presidents have Full and Total Immunity​

The only correct answer to that question is NO.

 

[19MU88]

Even for events that cross the line?

Just wondering if everybody thinks Biden should be able to “cross the line.”

Are we talking immunity from actual crimes or immunity from lawfare and fascists?

Clearly Biden and HRC don't need it, they don't worry about investigations much less charges or prosecution

 

[HerdandHokies]

Are we talking immunity from actual crimes or immunity from lawfare and fascists?

Clearly Biden and HRC don't need it, they don't worry about investigations much less charges or prosecution

Well according to the gentleman giving his opinion that I’m quoting it would be “full and total immunity.” Sounds like actual crimes to me.

 

[Bobbybbc]

That’s what impeachment is for. You get convicted and removed you are open for prosecution.

The Republicans in the Senate wouldn't impeach Trump no matter what he did. Including murder. He tried a coup and they let him off.

 

[Rock98Dog]

Obama targeted and killed US citizens without due process. It doesn’t get worse than that. It’s way worse than our general that blew up a friendly and his family during the botched Afghan pull out, for example.

Oh, and I like the way our board independent holds on to the debunked “find the votes” narrative even after the transcript of the call was released and the guy on the phone with Trump confirmed he never said that.

 

[SamSwimmer]

Interesting thread to revisit given the recent developments in the case.

 

[GeauxHerd]

Should Presidents have Full and Total Immunity​

The only correct answer to that question is NO.

 

[30CAT]

Should Presidents have Full and Total Immunity​

The only correct answer to that question is NO.

And that makes you, not surprisingly, WRONG.