Substantial assistance

[countryroads89]

Mueller letter to judge for sentencing says Flynn offered “substantial assistance.”

Flynn met with Mueller/DOJ 19 times.

Trump twitter meltdown tomorrow.

 

[herdfan06]

I hope out of respect for President George H.W. Bush, he stays off of the Twitter box for the day.

 

[19MU88]

Mueller letter to judge for sentencing says Flynn offered “substantial assistance.”

Flynn met with Mueller/DOJ 19 times.

Trump twitter meltdown tomorrow.

Now you’ve got him!

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

I hope out of respect for President George H.W. Bush, he stays off of the Twitter box for the day.

Nah, he's already been tweeting all morning long. At least it's mostly been about China.

 

[GK4Herd]

Nah, he's already been tweeting all morning long. At least it's mostly been about China.

He’s trying to rally up confidence after fear with tariffs and US/China trade relations has caused the DOW to plunge. Just another day of using his bully iPhone to govern.

 

[i am herdman]

What else would guys have to do if he wasn't ?

 

[ThunderCat98]

Here's my question. Say no charges are brought, do all you libs go along with the Special Counsel's decision, or do we continue to hear about Russian collusion and election interference for years and years to come? I know which one I'm placing my money on.

 

[extragreen]

Would that be similar to hearing "Lock her up, lock her up"? Asking for a friend....

 

[countryroads89]

Here's my question. Say no charges are brought,

Do you really think that's going to happen? LOL!

 

[WV-FAN]

Do you really think that's going to happen? LOL!

well, that answers that question . . .

 

[HerdBuckeye]

Here's my question. Say no charges are brought, do all you libs go along with the Special Counsel's decision, or do we continue to hear about Russian collusion and election interference for years and years to come? I know which one I'm placing my money on.

So say charges are brought are you trumptards going to go along with Mueller?

 

[ThunderCat98]

If charges are brought and he's convicted, it is what it is. What would be the basis to reject that conclusion? That's rhetorical, by the way.

 

[ThunderCat98]

I like how no one has actually answered the question.

 

[ThunderCat98]

Would that be similar to hearing "Lock her up, lock her up"? Asking for a friend....

Exactly! You've between spewing the "Hillary was never charged or convicted" line for two years. Will you apply that same logic to Trump? Of course you won't.

 

[extragreen]

Exactly! You've between spewing the "Hillary was never charged or convicted" line for two years

And it's STILL true, never charged or convicted.

Will you apply that same logic to Trump?

Certainly.

But either way, he will still be a lying, cheating, inexperienced, loud-mouthed coward.

 

[HerdBuckeye]

If charges are brought and he's convicted, it is what it is. What would be the basis to reject that conclusion? That's rhetorical, by the way.

Good. You’re on the record.

 

[ThunderCat98]

Good. You’re on the record.

Ok?

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

Here's my question. Say no charges are brought, do all you libs go along with the Special Counsel's decision, or do we continue to hear about Russian collusion and election interference for years and years to come? I know which one I'm placing my money on.

Contrary to what some of you believe, I am no lib...but I am going to stick with Donald Trump is a no-good SOB that is crooked as the day is long and he has no business being POTUS.

Also, Russian election interference is a fact, regardless of any "collusion". That genie is out of the bottle, and as long as a big chunk of the electorate are certifiable dumbasses there will be no putting it back.