Ahh so now we are against activist judgesNot some bumble**** judge in Texas.
They like it when THEIR judges are activistsAhh so now we are against activist judges
Yep, you can still get rid of your unwanted children.Well, looks like my fears on the timing were unfounded.
24th trimester abortions are still illegal.Yep, you can still get rid of your unwanted children.
I’m generally against judges making rules up from the bench and I’m pretty sure I’ve mentioned on here that I don’t think RvW was correctly decided. Congress punted on their job for decades and this is exactly what happens.Ahh so now we are against activist judges
Yes. The decision tonight was to stay the ruling, so the Texas ruling doesn’t go into effect until or unless the SCOTUS heard a the case and makes a decision. They could’ve let the decision stand and still chosen to hear it later but they decided the potential harm caused by not staying it made a stay worth it.From what I read this is going to go back to the court later this year.
What is the potential harm?Yes. The decision tonight was to stay the ruling, so the Texas ruling doesn’t go into effect until or unless the SCOTUS heard a the case and makes a decision. They could’ve let the decision stand and still chosen to hear it later but they decided the potential harm caused by not staying it made a stay worth it.
They could also choose not to hear it and for the stay to, well, stay. Given the current circuit split that’s very unlikely.
Women having to use riskier methods of abortion.What is the potential harm?
Why would they have to? Unless the father of their fetus is Tim Murphy or Scott DesJarlais.Women having to use riskier methods of abortion.
Women having to take personal responsibility for spreading their legs and actually carrying a pregnancy to term? Oh, the horror.What is the potential harm?
Women having to use riskier methods of abortion.
Completely agree. Good thing abortion isn’t murder.Or maybe, just maybe, they don’t commit murder. Thoughts?
Completely agree. Good thing abortion isn’t murder.
Is it the same as a miscarriage? No big deal?Completely agree. Good thing abortion isn’t murder.
Nevermind the men that were forced to crawl between those legs against their will and can then walk away from raising the child. Shut up.Women having to take personal responsibility for spreading their legs and actually carrying a pregnancy to term? Oh, the horror.
Don't get them pregnant. Novel idea but workable.Or maybe, just maybe, they don’t commit murder. Thoughts?
That process takes two people.Don't get them pregnant. Novel idea but workable.
By the way, always nice when the mask slips for a second and you all admit that you know a fetus isn’t a human, because that’s insane, and you just want to punish women for having sex.Women having to take personal responsibility for spreading their legs and actually carrying a pregnancy to term? Oh, the horror.
They why attack only one of the two?That process takes two people.
I am fully onboard with going after the men too. It does take two to tango. It would be nice to see a local mobile clinic set up to do vasectomy like they do for neutering cats too. Easily cheaper than paying for WIC and SNAP for 18 years.They why attack only one of the two?
What in the holy fvck are you talking about??? That is one of the dumbest arguments I have ever heard. It is beyond Dtard level bad.By the way, always nice when the mask slips for a second and you all admit that you know a fetus isn’t a human, because that’s insane, and you just want to punish women for having sex.
I doubt it.I am fully onboard with going after the men too.
with mandatory vasectomies at age 15.It would be nice to see a local mobile clinic set up to do vasectomy
At what point does it become a human?By the way, always nice when the mask slips for a second and you all admit that you know a fetus isn’t a human, because that’s insane, and you just want to punish women for having sex.
Why 15? Is that the youngest bull you will allow in the bedroom?I doubt it.
with mandatory vasectomies at age 15.
It allows you 3 more years before your scheduled mandatory vasectomy if the mandate went into effect now.Why 15?
If there are mandatory vasectomies at 15 years old, we no longer have an abortion problem and we are not having this conversation. But cowardly idiots like you would much rather force the women to carry the child and raise it for minimum of 18 years.So outlawing/limiting abortions should result in requiring mandatory vasectomies at 15?? I would ask for an expanded explanation from Greedtard, but fully realize he wouldn’t be able to provide it.
No one is saying she has to carry it, she can put it in a stroller.If there are mandatory vasectomies at 15 years old, we no longer have an abortion problem and we are not having this conversation. But cowardly idiots like you would much rather force the women to carry the child and raise it for minimum of 18 years.
You are a main reason that I am in favor of abortions. I wish your "birthing parent" would have sucked you up in a tube when it was pregnant with you. The world would be a smarter place for it.If there are mandatory vasectomies at 15 years old, we no longer have an abortion problem and we are not having this conversation. But cowardly idiots like you would much rather force the women to carry the child and raise it for minimum of 18 years.
Reminds me of when one of my coworkers told another that he should have been a blowjob.You are a main reason that I am in favor of abortions. I wish your "birthing parent" would have sucked you up in a tube when it was pregnant with you. The world would be a smarter place for it.
That would work, too.Reminds me of when one of my coworkers told another that he should have been a blowjob.
So the 13 year old “woman” has to take responsibility for having sex to the extent of having to go through pregnancy, give birth, and possibly raise a child at that age, yet that same “woman” can’t have the responsibility to make the choice about her own body if she wants to take hormone suppressors.You can believe having an abortion is murdering an innocent life AND think women need to exercise personal responsibility in their sex lives so they don't feel the need to murder their own child.
How so?I doubt it.
with mandatory vasectomies at age 15.