GK,
I heard an interview not too long ago that they asked Earl Woods years ago how many majors he thought Tiger would win. This was when Tiger had just turned Pro. He said 14 majors.
Tiger won 14 and some people think he was happy doing that and Jack's record was not really his inner drive. He wanted to meet his father's expectations.
Nobody knows but Tiger but that is a school of thought.
I agree with the post 2009 comments. I think he doesn't get enough credit for those years because the haters, as well as a media who smells blood, found a chink in his armor....the lack of major victories. That's really all they have. I
If people are going to refer to Tiger as the greatest golfer who ever played the game, that's pretty much the accepted benchmark.....the lack of major victories. That's really all they have. I
Oh bullshit. No child wants to disappoint their parents but this effed up notion that Tiger, a grown man & billionaire, couldn't take control of his life & had to satisfy his dad's ambition is insane. I refuse to believe Tiger's that weak of a person.I've never heard that. He certainly spent a life trying to live up to his father's expectations. I think Tiger, deep down, wants both the total victories and the majors, but like most of us when we age come to grip with the fact that our childhood dreams are seldom met and that happiness comes in conceding that although we came up a little short of our own dreams, we've done enough. Tiger has done enough.
Oh bullshit. No child wants to disappoint their parents but this effed up notion that Tiger, a grown man & billionaire, couldn't take control of his life & had to satisfy his dad's ambition is insane. I refuse to believe Tiger's that weak of a person.
Who said he was weak? He's the opposite of weak. You're reading way too much into my comments. Tiger was raised to be the best on the planet. Those are some lofty goals to pursue. Of course that effects the way he thinks and behaves as an adult.
As far as the "Tiger, a grown man & billionaire, couldn't take control of his life & had to satisfy his dad's ambition," comments...that's just hyperbole to create an argument where none exists. Read my post. I clearly state...
"Tiger's fall, from a personal standpoint, is of his own making."
Not to deny you your faux outrage, but you're making way too many assumptions about the way I think. Tiger is a flawed individual. We all are. And from a personal standpoint, he might be coming to grips with that for the first time in his life. I hope he finds it. That's just me I guess...one of those awful people that hopes that everyone comes to a peace in their life. But if you enjoy the outrage, have at it. I won't try to argue with you.
This is what you consider to be "outrage"? Wow. Calm down, GK. Your "faux outrage" defending Tiger is borderline insanity. INSANITY I SAY.
Right. Other than the little fact that I have zero problems stating when the best ever in other sports aren't white - & are usually black athletes. But somehow Tiger supporters think golf is different.Let's be honest and you all know me, I don't buy into the politically correct nonsense and race baiting.
Why were people against Tiger? Because he was a black guy in a lilly white sport and was on a pace to break the iconic Jack Nicklaus's records. Plain and simple.
That's what I've been saying for a while. Absolutely no shame in that either.Well at worst he is second best ever.
We're all brought up to be the best in the world. What parent raises their kid to be half-ass at something?
Unfortunately not "all".........and way too many.
That's part of the problem today.....Too much sh1tty parenting!