Hey, look! A jackass that thinks an idea proposed by an extreme fringe group represents the beliefs of conservatives as a whole! Congrats on your moronic post of the day award!Hey look the logical conclusion to all this madness.
Edit: for all the talk about how libs want to control your life or whatever, here it is. The cons want to control sex.
The Heritage Foundation being an extreme fringe group would be super coolHey, look! A jackass that thinks an idea proposed by an extreme fringe group represents the beliefs of conservatives as a whole! Congrats on your moronic post of the day award!
Dude your side is praising a guy the lit himself on fire for Palestine. Both sides have their idiots and idiotic ideasHey look the logical conclusion to all this madness.
Edit: for all the talk about how libs want to control your life or whatever, here it is. The cons want to control sex.
They praise actual terrorists in some cases. Hell they have at least two representatives for sure who do that.Dude your side is praising a guy the lit himself on fire for Palestine. Both sides have their idiots and idiotic ideas
Of course. But one of those on your side is running for president and is supported and defended by a vast majority of cons on this board. He is cowed by and influenced by any powerful authoritarian in other countries, engaged in insurrection and attempted to overturn the results of a free and fair election. While cons complain about non existent voter fraud, the continue to back a scumbag that attempted the largest voter fraud in American history. He suggested the shooting of immigrants and would actually do it if allowed, separated immigrant children from their parents as a deterrent (and some are still separated), attempted to take health insurance from millions of Americans. He actually managed to appoint justices that took away the right of women to make choices about THEIR bodies, stated that he would stand by (in the same way your side is doing right now) while putin invades a NATO nation. And is now claiming he cannot be charged after he leaves office for any of his actions while president. His total absence of morality and ethics creates a stench in America that other countries can smell.Dude your side is praising a guy the lit himself on fire for Palestine. Both sides have their idiots and idiotic ideas
Cons. Always obsessed with other people's genitals.An extreme thought but I think it is safe to say the sexual revolution has been a failure and something needs to be done to reverse these trends.
Increasing STDs
Sexually Transmitted Infections Surveillance, 2022 <B>Error processing SSI file</B><BR>
The most recent statistical data on the three nationally notifiable diseases and more.www.cdc.gov
Increasing abortions
Declining birthrates in developed countries
Declining birth rate in Developed Countries: A radical policy re-think is required
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Increasing sexual mental health issues
Sexual Orientation Identity Change and Depressive Symptoms: A Longitudinal Analysis
Several new studies have documented high rates of sexual identity mobility among young adults, but little work has investigated the links between identity change and mental health. This study uses the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Increasing sexualization of children
From Balenciaga to Disney, companies profit by sexualizing kids – at a horrific price
It's not just Balenciaga. Hypersexualizing kids exploits our most vulnerable population and delays the solutions we need to reduce sex trafficking.www.usatoday.com
Not to mention likely increases in deviant sexual behaviors, human trafficking (particularly children), etc.
Yeah, the Heritage Foundation is not remotely a fringe group. But you got the extreme part right.an extreme fringe group
So can we expect the end of the DNC too?Yeah, the Heritage Foundation is not remotely a fringe group. But you got the extreme part right.
It would be difficult to overstate the influence of HF in the policies of the Reagan Administration, same as in the choosing of officials in the Trump Administration.
This extreme -Puritan shit, even more than MAGA, will be the end of the GOP.
It’s a direct quote from their tweet.Has anyone even confirmed this was actually said or was it taken out of context? By the Rolling Stone no less...
Meanwhile it seems like many trivialize the negative consequences of the Sexual Revolution and we continue to put our young children at further risk with no real attempts to change behavior to a more responsible manner...
Yeah, the Heritage Foundation is not remotely a fringe group. But you got the extreme part right.
It would be difficult to overstate the influence of HF in the policies of the Reagan Administration, same as in the choosing of officials in the Trump Administration.
This extreme -Puritan shit, even more than MAGA, will be the end of the GOP.
Has anyone even confirmed this was actually said or was it taken out of context? By the Rolling Stone no less...
By sexual revolution, you mean that women were allowed to treat the act of sex like men do...at their own discretion.Meanwhile it seems like many trivialize the negative consequences of the Sexual Revolution and we continue to put our young children at further risk with no real attempts to change behavior to a more responsible manner...
MAGA is the extreme puritan shit.This extreme -Puritan shit, even more than MAGA, will be the end of the GOP.
Reagan ain't today's GOP.Reagan won in a landslide.
Is it though? I see it as more of an unholy alliance.MAGA is the extreme puritan shit.
But yeah once the mask is fully off I don’t see the anti-blowjob party doing well
Is it though? I see it as more of an unholy alliance.
Reagan ain't today's GOP.
Kick out EG and give us Rifle and I’ll take it.Kinda like you, H&H and EG being the unholy trinity of Pullman?
Think about when the “again” was that they want to return to and how things were, especially for women, at that time.Reagan ain't today's GOP.
Is it though? I see it as more of an unholy alliance.
Maga IS EXTREME PURITAN SHIT? HAHAHAA. No. There religious folks but, you must not understand. I know biker gang dudes, ex and current military guys that are not saints, swingers(not me smart asses), party animals, dope smokers(plenty of those), drinkers, fornicators, etc. All MAGA? Dudes that would make a sailor blush vote for Trump.MAGA is the extreme puritan shit.
But yeah once the mask is fully off I don’t see the anti-blowjob party doing well
I know hundreds of women literally that vote for Trump and are more entrenched in their support than I am. They would knock you upside the head for saying that.Kick out EG and give us Rifle and I’ll take it.
Think about when the “again” was that they want to return to and how things were, especially for women, at that time.
Kick out EG and give us Rifle and I’ll take it.
Think about when the “again” was that they want to return to and how things were, especially for women, at that time.
I remember when Liberals claimed abortions would be outlawed if RoeVWade was overturned. (The number of abortions has actually gone up).
It’s just much more difficult and expensive for women in many states. So you 1) haven’t actually protected any fetuses and 2) have made things worse for women.I remember when Liberals claimed abortions would be outlawed if RoeVWade was overturned. (The number of abortions has actually gone up).
How has removing a federal law made it more expensive? I never thought it would "save" unborn children. Because I never believed removing RVW would make abortions illegal, the way you pro baby killers claimed.It’s just much more difficult and expensive for women in many states. So you 1) haven’t actually protected any fetuses and 2) have made things worse for women.
But it is only a baby after it has left the birthing person's (mother's) body and taken its first breath of fresh/non-vag air.How has removing a federal law made it more expensive? I never thought it would "save" unborn children. Because I never believed removing RVW would make abortions illegal, the way you pro baby killers claimed.
Because states outlawed it and now women have to travel to other states for abortions (which Texas is trying to stop anyway.) You are not this dense.How has removing a federal law made it more expensive? I never thought it would "save" unborn children. Because I never believed removing RVW would make abortions illegal, the way you pro baby killers claimed.
Because states outlawed it and now women have to travel to other states for abortions (which Texas is trying to stop anyway.) You are not this dense.
Do you believe abortions should be allowed at any point during the pregnancy for any reason?Because states outlawed it and now women have to travel to other states for abortions (which Texas is trying to stop anyway.) You are not this dense.
I would draw the line at general viability, around 28 weeks, but only if there aren’t a thousand hoops laid in front of women who want one to try and delay it. As long as games are being played with access, sure, any time, any reason.Do you believe abortions should be allowed at any point during the pregnancy for any reason?
No. But the Dems right now still have a bigger tent than the GOP...the GOP is actively the running out their more moderate elected officials.Is the DNC the same as it was in 1980?
There's a lot more to that "then" on the populist side than women's rights.Think about when the “again” was that they want to return to and how things were, especially for women, at that time.
I'd be pretty pissed if I had to travel many states away for male health care.More than a third of patients in 2022 had to travel out of state due to restrictions
Viability has change over the years. If general viability becomes "around" 27 weeks, would you then draw the line at 27 weeks?I would draw the line at general viability, around 28 weeks, but only if there aren’t a thousand hoops laid in front of women who want one to try and delay it. As long as games are being played with access, sure, any time, any reason.
You continue to conflate abortions with tubal ligations.Mandatory male vasectomies at age 16... and abortion nearly disappears.
You continue to be an idiot.You continue to conflate abortions with tubal ligations.
To be honest I don’t really care morally about the difference between 4 weeks and 28 or 34 or whatever. But once you can induce and it can live a normal life sure, that’s a route out that can be taken. But again that’s assuming good, quick access to birth control and abortion services.Viability has change over the years. If general viability becomes "around" 27 weeks, would you then draw the line at 27 weeks?