Why does it always have to be basketball vs football? Both are average currently. Neither should be.
I think it comes down to whats used to "be critical" of either sport:
In basketball, its, "Dan needs to do better" "We're young and have to develop." "The season is early, hopefully we can recover." "I liked the effort by ______ we just need to execute better."
Vs.
"Doc needs to be fired" "MU is accepting of mediocrity" "Isaiah Green is TERRIBLE! AWFUL!" "This team is PATHETIC!!!"
There are literal threads dedicated to questioning everything about the football program over a 10 pt loss to someone but there is relatively little pessimism over a 30 pt loss in basketball.
One is not nearly as brutal as the other.
When people like goddamn Sam attempt to find optimism in a major letdown football season, he's ridiculed by everyone on here by being a Doc defender.
Leftygolfer basically says, 'I won't blame the coaching staff for our relative lack of prepararion and inexcusable blowout losses. Thats on the players! Its their fault! Not Dan's and they'll learn their lesson someday!'
Whats the difference between the two? Not much. Both are admitting the teams are not as good as they could be but also trying to find positives within.
Except one is being accepted as a status quo for criticism while the other sounds like a presidential tweet.
I have said Dan is on course to have a 2016 football season this year...so far its looking like it. But there aren't any "Fire Dan" threads. No pessimistic comments reading like its Doomsday or anything. Its hopeful posts and accepted positive notes from the losses.
Yet, even when the football team wins, its never enough and treated as such...as though MU can't simply win, it has to have a criteria of winning and unless it fits that exact list, it doesn't count.
MU fans might be the only fans that complain when their football team wins...but are totally silent in criticism when MU basketball wins an ugly game against a terrible lower level program.