There you go changing your argument again. Your claim was that they were "beautiful WMU coeds." I, along with one or two other people, commented on how unlikely it was that they were WMU students. That led to you posting yet another lie by claiming that WMU's enrollment was larger than morganhole's.
I have since further shown how unlikely it was that those make-believe "beautiful . . . coeds" were WMU students.
Why must you continue changing your argument on what you said?
