ADVERTISEMENT

Uhhhh ohhhhhh

You forgot to include a couple of quotes. Here, let me help you:


"If the forecast holds, it would be the best quarter since the Great Recession ended in 2009. The previous highest was third quarter of 2014, which hit 5.2 percent."

So, you're that excited to boast about a prediction - a fvcking prediction - that will be .2 better five quarters into his term than what Obama did? Lets not stop there:


"However, the Atlanta Fed's tracker has shown to have reliability issues in the past. In particular, the model's sensitivity to the ISM Manufacturing Index has led the gauge astray multiple times, causing growth to be overstated."

Let me restate what I previously typed: So, you're that excited to boast about a prediction - a fvcking prediction from a system that has a history of greatly overestimating growth - that will be .2 better five quarters into his term than what Obama did?

That's like a team that finished in last place throwing a party when the media selects them to finish in next to last place next year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NutcaseConservative
Stick to coaching. I'm not bragging. This isn't even about Obummer, moron.

Remember when libs mocked the idea of Trump claiming the economy would grow above 4% with his policies?

You pay more attention to boy bands than economics or Fed Reserve predictions. Keep up the good work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SamSwimmer
Stick to coaching. I'm not bragging. This isn't even about Obummer, moron.

Remember when libs mocked the idea of Trump claiming the economy would grow above 4% with his policies?

You pay more attention to boy bands than economics or Fed Reserve predictions. Keep up the good work.
Says Raleigh the expert on everything. Greatest scholar on the planet and not to mention financial guru.

Raleigh is exhausted from day trading penny stocks all day. After his shift at Tudors.
 
Says Raleigh the expert on everything. Greatest scholar on the planet and not to mention financial guru.

Raleigh is exhausted from day trading penny stocks all day. After his shift at Tudors.

Bucky is obsessed with my daily activities. If you want some market insight just ask.

Unfortunately you’re too dumb to understand the difference between trading and investing or up and down on a stock chart.

Doesn’t take an expert bucky. Just someone who has the willingness to work and pay attention.

One of these days you might even realize Tudor’s doesn’t exist in my neck of the woods. Your attempt at mocking even fails miserably.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SamSwimmer
Bucky is obsessed with my daily activities. If you want some market insight just ask.

Unfortunately you’re too dumb to understand the difference between trading and investing or up and down on a stock chart.

Doesn’t take an expert bucky. Just someone who has the willingness to work and pay attention.

One of these days you might even realize Tudor’s doesn’t exist in my neck of the woods. Your attempt at mocking even fails miserably.
I was in your neck of the woods a while back, went to the big rock sports show (gun/fishing/sporting supplies) at the convention center . . . assuming you're in Raleigh, anyhoo. damn, what a drunken couple of days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: raleighherdfan
Stick to coaching. I'm not bragging. This isn't even about Obummer, moron.

Remember when libs mocked the idea of Trump claiming the economy would grow above 4% with his policies?

You pay more attention to boy bands than economics or Fed Reserve predictions. Keep up the good work.
Rifle doesnt like boy bands hes a tyler childers fan now and stapleton. Sturgill simpson if he would listen and he likes to ROCK
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThunderCat98
Bucky is obsessed with my daily activities. If you want some market insight just ask.

Unfortunately you’re too dumb to understand the difference between trading and investing or up and down on a stock chart.

Doesn’t take an expert bucky. Just someone who has the willingness to work and pay attention.

One of these days you might even realize Tudor’s doesn’t exist in my neck of the woods. Your attempt at mocking even fails miserably.
No Raleigh I don’t need your help managing my wealth. I have it taken care of. You think your smarter than the guys at Goldman that’s all I needed to know from day one to know who I was dealing with. A total ass clown know it all who actually knows nothing.
 
No Raleigh I don’t need your help managing my wealth. I have it taken care of. You think your smarter than the guys at Goldman that’s all I needed to know from day one to know who I was dealing with. A total ass clown know it all who actually knows nothing.

keep'm coming bucky. My god...if I "know nothing", that means you're in a world of shit. I cant name one thing you've gotten right during any of our discussions. Keep on obsessing bucky.

Never did I claim I am "smarter" than the guys at goldman. just use some of their strategies. Speaking of "strategy"......you still trying to figure out what that means in relation to govt economic reports?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SamSwimmer
No Raleigh I don’t need your help managing my wealth. I have it taken care of. You think your smarter than the guys at Goldman that’s all I needed to know from day one to know who I was dealing with. A total ass clown know it all who actually knows nothing.

One would think you, having so much in common with Trump (being a real estate tycoon) you would idolize the man. He's done more in real estate before 7am than you will ever accomplish in your lifetime.

Or is that the problem? Jealousy?
 
One would think you, having so much in common with Trump (being a real estate tycoon) you would idolize the man. He's done more in real estate before 7am than you will ever accomplish in your lifetime.

Or is that the problem? Jealousy?
Bahahaha
 
where is HerdBuckeye Tower located? Asking for a friend.
Ohio herd the same guy that said trump was already reducing the debt a couple months after taking office. How many debt ceilings have we already hit since trump took office. Asking for a friend.
 
The U.S. national debt grew by just a bit more than $600 billion in fiscal year 2017, almost half the average annual growth seen in the Obama years.Give it time grasshopper.PS, looked on Google Earth for your tower since you are on the same level as Trump....nothing yet, will try again later.
 
A total ass clown know it all who actually knows nothing.

059.gif
 
Remember when libs mocked the idea of Trump claiming the economy would grow above 4% with his policies?

No. Care to share?

So now you’re basing your argument on a prediction from a source which has a long history of being way off on predictions.

Stick to pretending to be socialize daily with experts on every subject
broached on this board. At least that way, we can call the fabricated acquaintances “morons” instead of directing the comments act you.
 
No. Care to share?

So now you’re basing your argument on a prediction from a source which has a long history of being way off on predictions.

Stick to pretending to be socialize daily with experts on every subject
broached on this board. At least that way, we can call the fabricated acquaintances “morons” instead of directing the comments act you.

Someone as worldly as yourself should be able to google story after story of financial news mocking the idea of Trump economic GDP predictions. You do a great job of normally plagiarizing lists of other anti-Trump liberal talking points from the NYT or WaPo as your own. Look at this as another opportunity.

Man, you're slipping in your rebuttals. I would expect something a little more intelligent than repeating bucky or dtard type effort.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SamSwimmer
Someone as worldly as yourself should be able to google story after story of financial news mocking the idea of Trump economic GDP predictions. You do a great job of normally plagiarizing lists of other anti-Trump liberal talking points from the NYT or WaPo as your own. Look at this as another opportunity.

Man, you're slipping in your rebuttals. I would expect something a little more intelligent than repeating bucky or dtard type effort.

I’m not the one who made the claim. I simply said that I didn’t remember it. If it’s so easy, you should have no problem linking dozens of examples. Go ahead . . .

Keep in mind: you said there were a lot of liberals mocking a 4% prediction. In reality, plenty of left-leaning publications claimed that it is possible for 3%-4% growth. What was mocked was cheeto’s claim of 6%.

But go ahead, lets see your list.
 
One of My favorite things when Raleigh makes a claim then deflects to anyone who challenges him to produce his supporting docs. Good job Raleigh. You never disapppoint.
 
I’m not the one who made the claim. I simply said that I didn’t remember it. If it’s so easy, you should have no problem linking dozens of examples. Go ahead . . .

Keep in mind: you said there were a lot of liberals mocking a 4% prediction. In reality, plenty of left-leaning publications claimed that it is possible for 3%-4% growth. What was mocked was cheeto’s claim of 6%.

But go ahead, lets see your list.
here is an article.

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/30/trumps-hope-for-3-percent-growth-no-longer-looks-so-far-fetched.html

He actually said 4, but added it could go higher

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ter/promise/1414/grow-economy-4-percent-year/
 
One of My favorite things when Raleigh makes a claim then deflects to anyone who challenges him to produce his supporting docs. Good job Raleigh. You never disapppoint.

Priceless, from someone who has yet to post an assertion or “guaranteed” prediction that’s come to fruition.

Keep’m coming bucky.
 
This has cracked me up. His poor kids - could have gotten the Oberlin semester covered with those 2017 gains.



 
Last edited:
Uhhhhhh. Ohhhhhhh. Bucky and former Rifle mad.

This is why I lump you in with all of the other morons on this board.

I asked you to show me all of those liberals mocking cheeto for his 4% claim. I said that they did over the 6% claim, but I couldn’t recall them doing it over 4%. I asked you to show me.

This other moron posts a link showing that some economists - none of which are labeled politically - were skeptical over cheeto’s claim. His “proof” is not only missing any liberal connection that you claimed, but it is also missing any mockery.

Then, you’re dumb enough to think that it somehow validated your claim.
 

This isn’t unbelievable. I’m so sick of morons wasting my time on here due to them not being able to critical read and follow their own argument.

Did you even read your own god damn source? Not only did it not say anything about liberals, but it clearly stated that the claim they were disputing was that the economy would see a growth of 3% annually for ten years as the White House claimed. God damn, the link to that article and a direct quote about that claim is even in your own fvcking source.

Nobody is disputing a 3% growth for a quarter. Nobody is disputing a 3% growth for even a year. What everyone was disputing was the White House release of 3% growth every year for a decade. It even has a direct quote your article about it.

I mean, fvck. Do you guys ever read; real publications, not the USA Today?

I’m going to the college national debate tournament this weekend. Kansas is predicted to win it with Harvard being next up. I think some of you need to make a trip to it next year so that you can be taught by these 19 year olds how to construct and defend an argument.

I’m not even going to bother reading your other attempts from sources, because I’m sure they also say something completely different than what you claimed and what I challenged you on.
 
This is why I lump you in with all of the other morons on this board.

I asked you to show me all of those liberals mocking cheeto for his 4% claim. I said that they did over the 6% claim, but I couldn’t recall them doing it over 4%. I asked you to show me.

This other moron posts a link showing that some economists - none of which are labeled politically - were skeptical over cheeto’s claim. His “proof” is not only missing any liberal connection that you claimed, but it is also missing any mockery.

Then, you’re dumb enough to think that it somehow validated your claim.

Brookings Institute isn't liberal? NYT isn't liberal? Paul Krugman isn't a liberal economist? CNN is "conservative"?

Keep'm coming buckyII.
 
This isn’t unbelievable. I’m so sick of morons wasting my time on here due to them not being able to critical read and follow their own argument.

Did you even read your own god damn source? Not only did it not say anything about liberals, but it clearly stated that the claim they were disputing was that the economy would see a growth of 3% annually for ten years as the White House claimed. God damn, the link to that article and a direct quote about that claim is even in your own fvcking source.

Nobody is disputing a 3% growth for a quarter. Nobody is disputing a 3% growth for even a year. What everyone was disputing was the White House release of 3% growth every year for a decade. It even has a direct quote your article about it.

I mean, fvck. Do you guys ever read; real publications, not the USA Today?

I’m going to the college national debate tournament this weekend. Kansas is predicted to win it with Harvard being next up. I think some of you need to make a trip to it next year so that you can be taught by these 19 year olds how to construct and defend an argument.

I’m not even going to bother reading your other attempts from sources, because I’m sure they also say something completely different than what you claimed and what I challenged you on.

Cool story "all world".

Next thing you'll be telling us is that Brookings is conservative... Oh..you already did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio herd
In the "former rifle" world....FAO economists are "conservative" too....."when pigs fly" isn't mocking either....lmao. Pays to read the internal sources of the stories provided.

bucky just too dumb to read.....period.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT