Wade paid for thousands of dollars in plane tickets for Fani
- Thread starter GeauxHerd
- Start date
You're a lying punk. And you continue to prove it. There happens to be more to the Constitution that you want to ignore.
Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection and Other Rights
Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
- Your orange jesus comitted all of that ^^^
That's a lie, judgey. No where has he been charged with or convicted of any of that. There's a reason no one charged him, liar.
We'll need a conviction on that, chief. Which goes back to my question: was he convicted? We only have opinions he committed from weak troglodytes like yourself.
You lose now. You'll lose later.
Sucks to suck.
You're orange jesus has been found to have engaged in an insurrection by 1 district court, a State Supreme Court, and a sec of state. All 3 have found he is disqualified from holding office. You lying idiot.
It's never been needed before. Punk.
Hasn't been required in the past. Punk.
We have decisions by a district court, State Supreme Court, and a sec of state. Idiot.
I have not lost now. The Supreme Court ruling...I have already admitted your conservative Supreme Court will likely rule in your orange jesus' favor. Because they're cowards.
You're a lying idiot. Punk.
Was your orange jesus convicted in his sexual abuse and defamation case? No. Does he have to pay his victim $5 million without a conviction? Moron.
It's all you know. Born loser.
If you want to make this a function of time:
f(greed) = x(loser); where x = time.
Solved: loser for any time x.
You're a lying idiot. magat. You're orange jesus has been found to have engaged in an insurrection by 1 district court, a State Supreme Court, and a sec of state. All 3 have found he is disqualified from holding office. You lying idiot.
Maybe you should switch from making cabinets to coffins. That's how dead your argument is.
Can't answer the question? Punk. Here it is again...
Was your orange jesus convicted in his sexual abuse and defamation case? No. Does he have to pay his victim $5 million without a conviction? Moron.
Settlement ≠ conviction. Big companies have entire legal teams to navigate the myriad of lawsuits from society leeches like yourself who want to get paid. Often it's cheaper to settle than litigate. Especially if you have expensive attorneys—as Trump does. 5 million dollars? That's not a drop in the bucket to him.
I answered your question.
Now answer mine: was Trump convicted of a crime? Yes or no?
You're a liar. Punk. Here's the question...
Was your orange jesus convicted in his sexual abuse and defamation case? Was E Jean Carroll awarded $5 million?
Isn't that going through appeals right now? Plus, he wasn't convicted of sexual abuse. He was found liable (which is stupid) and it has been appealed.
He f*cking doesn't know how the court systems work. He doesn't know how anything works for that matter.
Just glues wood and bleats.
He doesn't know what an appeal is or how the appellate system works (or if it exists).
NO. He was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation and ordered to pay his victim $5 million.
There is now a second case in which the court will decide how much more he will pay for continuing to defame his victim. Liability was determined in the first case. You lying idiot magat.
That's correct. And it cost him $5 million in liability.
He lost that appeal.
Damn, you're a dumbass. How about this article from TODAY saying he is appealing the ruling?
Why lie all the time, liar?
Trump may testify in E Jean Carroll defamation case: What you need to know
Trump has already been fined in one case brought by Carroll. On Monday he might testify in another.
I think we're arguing with a double-digit IQ moron and wasting our time.Damn, you're a dumbass. How about this article from TODAY saying he is appealing the ruling?
Why lie all the time, liar?
Trump may testify in E Jean Carroll defamation case: What you need to know
Trump has already been fined in one case brought by Carroll. On Monday he might testify in another.www.aljazeera.com
@big_country90 is right. We might as well try to talk sense to a wall. He doesn't have the capacity for, well, a lot of things; and is grasp on reality hangs by a thread.
SUPPLY SIDE FAILURE of intelligence.
Patiently waiting for the repetitive "you're an idiot, you're a liar, oath breaker! RHEEEEEEEEEE!" posts that are undoubtedly coming.
If one didn't know better, they would think he's 9, not 79, or whatever age his old decrepit ass is. One thing is for sure, gramp's posts definitely lays out what Arch said above, double digit iq, albeit extremely low double digit.
If one didn't know better, they would think he's 9, not 79, or whatever age his old decrepit ass is. One thing is for sure, gramp's posts definitely lays out what Arch said above, double digit iq, albeit extremely low double digit.
in before "you're a liar! want proof? daddy's here!"
Last edited:
The Supreme Court did not accept the appealDamn, you're a dumbass. How about this article from TODAY saying he is appealing the ruling?
Why lie all the time, liar?
Trump may testify in E Jean Carroll defamation case: What you need to know
Trump has already been fined in one case brought by Carroll. On Monday he might testify in another.
