ADVERTISEMENT

We just took out 62 terrorists in Somalia

And this is typical behavior of a Leftist. Dtard isn't a liberal, he's a Leftist. He can't separate his delusion from reality to make logical statements. His hate for others who do not think like him is only surpassed by the irony in how tolerant he and other Leftists claims to be.

^^^43% of the republican party believe obama is muslim as of 2015
 
so you would allow 75% of the world to come right in.

Did someone say that? Here's what I ACTUALLY said:

"Unlike you, I believe that food, clothing, and the right to seek a safe place to live should fall under human rights and is in fact a viable reason."

Viable reason for what? Answer: SEEKING asylum. Not necessarily granting it.
 
Ignorance. Or, according to rifle in the most counterintuitive thing I've ever read on this board, it's because he wanted to "save" her life.

Are you truly this delusional? Why would a father put his daughter through that and risk her life? Obviously, the situation must have been much worse at home, right? Exactly.

Or take the words of the 9 year old who was recently interviewed by border patrol. When asked why she came, she said she would do it all over again (the long journey). When questioned as to why she would choose to do it all over again, she said it was because she would at least have some say/control in how she died with this instead of dying back home at somebody else's control.

Again, Tier Three, pretend to be a little intelligent for a minute. The father, as anyone who makes that trek knows, was aware of the dangers of that long journey. Do you think he would put his life and his daughter's life in jeopardy unless they faced extreme safety issue at home?
 
how, exactly, is the united states government or the president of the united states responsible for this child's death?
 
Going to port of entry. And more would do that if those ports didn't have a 12 day wait time. What would be the proper thing for the U S to do to remedy that problem?
Increase number of people to process applications. All should do that. People have no right to break the law entering into our country. No matter what the circumstances
 
anybody that would like to answer would be fine, specifically those who have made the claim.

Well, I didn't make that claim, but let me help educate you.

cheeto and the U.S. government is aware that immigrants are trying to escape legitimate dangers in their homelands. As a result, they are embarking on perilous journeys for thousands of miles. This includes stretches in very rough terrain, dangerous environments, and limited food/water.

These immigrants facing real danger are trying to abide by U.S. law and claim asylum at a port of entry. However, as I detailed months ago, cheeto has instructed border patrol to make this nearly impossible. Before being able to step on U.S. soil at a border entry, they are forcefully being turned away. They are told to come back in a couple of weeks. cheeto has done this to dissuade future immigration.

Now, you have people already who are exhausted with no money, no food, no water, no shelter, and potentially with serious medical conditions as a result of the journey having to wait weeks to follow U.S. law . . . then, when they come back weeks later, they are told the same thing. That puts some culpability on cheeto's shoulders.

At some point, the real threats and need for surviving pushes them to cross illegally . . . or, at best, at another border entry which means another long journey across rough terrain. And as those alternative border entries get much busier, as has been the case since cheeto instructed border patrol to turn people away from being able to claim asylum at major points of entry, cheeto has refused to increase staffing at those alternative locations. So a crossing that used to have four border employees to service 100 people per day continues to only have four border employees to service 2000 people per day. So when emergencies take place, like with the little girl, they are ill-prepared to be able to handle the situation. Again, that puts some culpability on cheeto's shoulders.

But this sh!t isn't new. I went over this months ago when I described the catch-22 that cheeto was purposely setting up that makes doing the legal thing nearly impossible for those wanting to do right by U.S. law.
 
Well, I didn't make that claim, but let me help educate you.

cheeto and the U.S. government is aware that immigrants are trying to escape legitimate dangers in their homelands. As a result, they are embarking on perilous journeys for thousands of miles. This includes stretches in very rough terrain, dangerous environments, and limited food/water.

These immigrants facing real danger are trying to abide by U.S. law and claim asylum at a port of entry. However, as I detailed months ago, cheeto has instructed border patrol to make this nearly impossible. Before being able to step on U.S. soil at a border entry, they are forcefully being turned away. They are told to come back in a couple of weeks. cheeto has done this to dissuade future immigration.

Now, you have people already who are exhausted with no money, no food, no water, no shelter, and potentially with serious medical conditions as a result of the journey having to wait weeks to follow U.S. law . . . then, when they come back weeks later, they are told the same thing. That puts some culpability on cheeto's shoulders.

At some point, the real threats and need for surviving pushes them to cross illegally . . . or, at best, at another border entry which means another long journey across rough terrain. And as those alternative border entries get much busier, as has been the case since cheeto instructed border patrol to turn people away from being able to claim asylum at major points of entry, cheeto has refused to increase staffing at those alternative locations. So a crossing that used to have four border employees to service 100 people per day continues to only have four border employees to service 2000 people per day. So when emergencies take place, like with the little girl, they are ill-prepared to be able to handle the situation. Again, that puts some culpability on cheeto's shoulders.

But this sh!t isn't new. I went over this months ago when I described the catch-22 that cheeto was purposely setting up that makes doing the legal thing nearly impossible for those wanting to do right by U.S. law.
does it make you tingle inside everytime you type "cheeto"?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT