1. We recruit Florida extremely heavily. Zero Sun Belt teams located in Florida. We recruit Virginia heavily. Zero Sun Belt teams located in Virginia. We recruit Tennessee heavily. Zero Sun Belt teams from Tennessee.“Southern” conference, close proximity, natural (and former, real) rivals, substantial reduction in travel costs, areas we heavily recruit, better teams, drivable away games.....
Whoa, whoa, whoa. You're using logic and reason. That crap ain't flying around here.“Southern” conference, close proximity, natural (and former, real) rivals, substantial reduction in travel costs, areas we heavily recruit, better teams, drivable away games.....
His post was almost completely false, though.Whoa, whoa, whoa. You're using logic and reason. That crap ain't flying around here.
His post was almost completely false, though.
This. If the leagues and schools really want to maintain some semblance of D1 football, this needs to be done. We can't continue in this shitty league and dole out 3.2 million a year in travel expenses - at least that was the number thrown out on this board a while back.This will never happen, but the Sun Belt and CUSA should just trade teams (East in one conf, West in the other). Saves travel costs. You could probably work it out in a way that both end up about the same.
The problem with Sun Belt is that they have to play a good amount of mid week games as part of their ESPN deal. The upside is that I think every game is at least on ESPN +.
A shakeup by both leagues could in effect make a situation where no one pays extit or entry fees, they just trade members - one for one. I know, it's easier said than done but makes a hell of a lot of sense. jmho.So how many millions do we want to spend leaving CUSA and how many millions do we want to spend joining the Sunbelt? Also how many tournament shares do we want to give up by leaving CUSA?
Also how many tournament shares do we want to give up by leaving CUSA?
Each year the NCAA gives each Conference a share or unit for each win in the tournament. The more wins, the more units. It then combines these units with those earned in the 6 previous tournaments for distribution each year.Right now not too many since CUSA only gets one.
Yep. But these days, we need to have a discussion as to whats best for Marshall's future. It's more than just about football. It's about trying to form a league that makes sense geographically, that cuts down on travel expenses, yet keeps some schools intact and still playing one another. We have no business flying all our teams to Texas 1-2 times a year, just like they don't need to fly here. In an era with less state funding, less university funds being pumped into athletics and an aging, shrinking fan base, Marshall needs to look at all options. It may be that CUSA is the best option, now and in the future. If thats the case, so be it. jmhoI remember when threads like this began when literally any other conference had a good week of football.
A shakeup by both leagues could in effect make a situation where no one pays extit or entry fees, they just trade members - one for one. I know, it's easier said than done but makes a hell of a lot of sense. jmho.
Good point. I’d say it would be a long and drawn out process to determine who goes where. Not sure theYeah, but what is being suggested is one conference gets to load up on the best programs from each conference. Neither will want to be the one left with the rejects and under performers, so how does that get sorted out? Lawsuits, would be my guess.
Not really sure a super league would fly, as you say, those left behind would attempt hold it up in court. That could take some time and major bucks. Which wouldn’t be worth it.Yeah, but what is being suggested is one conference gets to load up on the best programs from each conference. Neither will want to be the one left with the rejects and under performers, so how does that get sorted out? Lawsuits, would be my guess.
The American Athletic Conference doesn't endorse your post.Yeah, but what is being suggested is one conference gets to load up on the best programs from each conference. Neither will want to be the one left with the rejects and under performers, so how does that get sorted out? Lawsuits, would be my guess.
Yep. But these days, we need to have a discussion as to whats best for Marshall's future. It's more than just about football. It's about trying to form a league that makes sense geographically, that cuts down on travel expenses, yet keeps some schools intact and still playing one another. We have no business flying all our teams to Texas 1-2 times a year, just like they don't need to fly here. In an era with less state funding, less university funds being pumped into athletics and an aging, shrinking fan base, Marshall needs to look at all options. It may be that CUSA is the best option, now and in the future. If thats the case, so be it. jmho
Good point. I’d say it would be a long and drawn out process to determine who goes where. Not sure the
Not really sure a super league would fly, as you say, those left behind would attempt hold it up in court. That could take some time and major bucks. Which wouldn’t be worth it.
I still like the idea of an East - West split of the two leagues. That seems very doable geographically. Based on Rhino’s scenario, both would be well balanced as well.
Okay, and what is the future?
If the recent events haven't already shown that every school is out for itself then I don't know what will.
What does MU bring to the table that the Sun Belt doesn't already have?
Mind you, whatever you say, can't be said against MU in the future. See, one moment, MU should go and move up in the world and at the same time is forever stuck being in the worst conference in America.
You can't have it both ways whenever you feel it fits whatever mood you're in.
If MU had, lets say, the metro area and economy of Charlotte or a basketball team who routinely made runs in the NCAA tournament, maybe they'd have something. Academic-wise, MU is pretty solid, but how much does that factor into sports?
The fanbase is so fickle, even if MU did move up and joined the Sun Belt or even the AAC, to offset costs of leaving (because we all know how cheap some posters on here are) and joining a new conference, ticket prices may go up.
Do you think the average joe fan is going to want that?
...this fanbase is divided over hot dogs, I couldn't begin to imagine anythibg substantial like a conference shift.
Don't let this past weekend's results with the SunBelt fool you, they league is no better across the board than C-USA, maybe even less as solid.
Yep. But these days, we need to have a discussion as to whats best for Marshall's future. It's more than just about football. It's about trying to form a league that makes sense geographically, that cuts down on travel expenses, yet keeps some schools intact and still playing one another. We have no business flying all our teams to Texas 1-2 times a year, just like they don't need to fly here. In an era with less state funding, less university funds being pumped into athletics and an aging, shrinking fan base, Marshall needs to look at all options. It may be that CUSA is the best option, now and in the future. If thats the case, so be it. jmho
You mean like sending the teams to Texas Southern or UT Arlington, both in the Sun Belt? Maybe I'm missing something but how would we cut down on travel expenses by going to the Sun Belt? By going to Arkansas instead of Texas? Georgia instead of Florida? Louisiana instead of Mississippi?
Hell, in CUSA football we at least have one game the team buses to in WKU. In the Sun Belt they look to all be plane trips.
While I'd prefer a better (in terms of regional) conference, all these types of questions, discussions, and answers (i'd hope) were had/held/made when MU left the MAC. C-USA was the answer then; but it was a much different perspective of why one would travel far and wide to get to an opponent, New Orleans, Memphis, Tulsa, Orlando... to name a few. Would have, should have, who knows. MU should have bolted C-USA when everyone else left, Sun Belt became better because of Appy State only, kind of like the MAC did because of MU years ago. Without Appy State, the SunBelt isn't a home for us any better than C-USA. The big mistake was not "recruiting" AppyState, regardless of the imbalance in numbers at that time. I don't like losing the two FL schools, it WILL matter over time. As mentioned elsewhere, the travel isn't really a big deal if a school is winning and has 20,000 or plus fans in regular attendance. Don't let this past weekend's results with the SunBelt fool you, they league is no better across the board than C-USA, maybe even less as solid. The whole issue can be remedied by C-USA casting off two really bad schools in Texas, Rice and UTEP; move to twelve and move on. I can suspect that the SunBelt has no vision of taking anyone out of C-USA except the two FL schools, Marshall and perhaps (yes) ODU.
I am advocating an eastern based league and a western based league by taking teams from each conference and forming two new leagues based on geography. See Rhinos post above. Something like that. It’s not hard to figure out geographically.You mean like sending the teams to Texas Southern or UT Arlington, both in the Sun Belt? Maybe I'm missing something but how would we cut down on travel expenses by going to the Sun Belt? By going to Arkansas instead of Texas? Georgia instead of Florida? Louisiana instead of Mississippi?
Hell, in CUSA football we at least have one game the team buses to in WKU. In the Sun Belt they look to all be plane trips.
I am advocating an eastern based league and a western based league by taking teams from each conference and forming two new leagues based on geography. See Rhinos post above. Something like that. It’s not hard to figure out geographically.
We don’t need to fly to Texas or La multiple times a year.
I am for a hybrid league. The SB offers nothing and vice versa. The Belt and CUSA are basically one in the same, although right now, the Belt is hotter. We'll never be moving up, you can close that conversation unless you or someone else wants to take Chris Clines place - and thats the type of donor it will take. At this point, we just need to do the best we can. Win games, take care of our business, and see where the chips fall.
you and I see this for what it is. Any realignment short of a new east/west configuration will never happen. The only reason I think this has a chance is due to the high cost of travel and wear and tear on a person. COVID has changed thingsI am advocating an eastern based league and a western based league by taking teams from each conference and forming two new leagues based on geography. See Rhinos post above. Something like that. It’s not hard to figure out geographically.
We don’t need to fly to Texas or La multiple times a year.
These threads, which, in deed, start every time a G5 team not in CUSA has a nice week, are really tiresome.
Sadly, its a case of guilty by association. The glory days we keep puffing our chests about ended 18 years ago.Semantic arguments about which G5 conference we "need to get in" are ridiculous. All of these conferences are made up of the same #90 - #120, bottom tier, truthfully FCS, trash programs, with 1-2 exceptions per conference, per season.
Marshall should just focus on "not being trash."