Noo.. Just shows wha they will do to stop an outsider.In before herdman screams at clouds about how this means war
This isn’t making the point you think it isWow ..... only the 2nd time in U.S. history that a sitting or former president has been brought up on criminal charges.
First, the DA is trying to run for higher office. Trying to make a name for himself.This is not because they want him in jail as a primary objective. It’s to guarantee he wins the primary and keep him in the news. It’s a no lose proposition. It’s a good political move.
You and those like you are idiots. Here is the deal. Trump can’t win with only low iq voters like you. He won’t win “main stream” republicans and the middle is trending further and further away from him. He has no shot at winning the presidency. His ego and your ignorance will keep a dem in the White House.First, the DA is trying to run for higher office. Trying to make a name for himself.
Then, the Democrats want to cuff him. They will do anything to get him. They could tell this guy to tone down. The bigger picture is they want to take down anyone from the outside. It makes anyone from outside think twice to run for any kind of office.
They do realize the Republicans will now go after a Democrat somewhere in this manner. They are going to do it to them at some point.
At the end of the day Trump is Biden's chief opponent. Trump is on his way to beig the nominee, like it or not. That makes him Biden's opponent. DeSatnis can't beat Trump and the Dems know they are going to run against Trump. Plain and simple.
America is on tis way to bein destroyed.
You better wake up. This is bigger than Trump. This is a takedown of the system and the takedown of our founding. Stamp our Judeo Christain founding. Stamp out the Constitution. Stamp out the Right To Bear Arms. Go after kids and divide.You and those like you are idiots. Here is the deal. Trump can’t win with only low iq voters like you. He won’t win “main stream” republicans and the middle is trending further and further away from him. He has no shot at winning the presidency. His ego and your ignorance will keep a dem in the White House.
If ever there was a time for a truly viable third party candidate 2024 would be it
This is awesome.. Stamp out the Constitution. .
Your side are corrupt commies and have started a banana republicThis is awesome.
About a year ago, Trump said that he was in favor of eliminating the constitution. Now, Herman is defending Trump by arguing that this is part of eliminating the constitution and isn’t right.
Herman doesn’t realize that trump was mocking him by saying “I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and wouldn't lose any voters, okay?”
Derpy derpy derpYou better wake up. This is bigger than Trump. This is a takedown of the system and the takedown of our founding. Stamp our Judeo Christain founding. Stamp out the Constitution. Stamp out the Right To Bear Arms. Go after kids and divide.
We are headed for a Hard State Corrupt Govt and then the road to Communism. Plain and simple. It is about protecting the state , the govt , at all cost.
I will compare my IQ to yours any day. W2, paycheck, whatever you want.
It is not about Trump. It is about the corrupt govt and the path we are headed.
Fix it now or you will fight your way out of it later.
you are a sheep. if you cant see what they are doing then well, when you are old and sit back and look at what happens to your country you can say I told you so. They are heading to one party ruleDerpy derpy derp
No the difference is I know what they are doing I’m just intelligent enough to know that trump ain’t the one to get us through ityou are a sheep. if you cant see what they are doing then well, when you are old and sit back and look at what happens to your country you can say I told you so. They are heading to one party rule
It's also important to point out that the threshold for gaining an indictment is much easier than gaining a conviction.While the DA is the one who would bring charges… as a reminder about grand jury, it consists of a large number of jurors who sit and hear evidence. That evidence then is voted on by them, whether or not there was enough evidence to allow those charges to go forward. There has to be a majority vote in the affirmative, “a true bill”, for an indictment on charges brought forth.
I guess it could be slightly different in NY than in WV, but I served on the cabell county grand jury for a 16 month term. We had 16 jurors from all different backgrounds who met once a month, every month, for the whole term. The PA just presented the charges, then left the room while voting and deliberation takes places.
This isn’t really all the DA, it is really the jurors who saw and heard enough evidence to say there is enough to go forward with the charges. It’s not guilty or not guilty verdict. It’s a true bill vs not true bill.
I keep thinking about that ham sandwich.It's also important to point out that the threshold for gaining an indictment is much easier than gaining a conviction.
The DA has what we call a friendly grand jury.While the DA is the one who would bring charges… as a reminder about grand jury, it consists of a large number of jurors who sit and hear evidence. That evidence then is voted on by them, whether or not there was enough evidence to allow those charges to go forward. There has to be a majority vote in the affirmative, “a true bill”, for an indictment on charges brought forth.
I guess it could be slightly different in NY than in WV, but I served on the cabell county grand jury for a 16 month term. We had 16 jurors from all different backgrounds who met once a month, every month, for the whole term. The PA just presented the charges, then left the room while voting and deliberation takes places.
This isn’t really all the DA, it is really the jurors who saw and heard enough evidence to say there is enough to go forward with the charges. It’s not guilty or not guilty verdict. It’s a true bill vs not true bill.
It's also important to point out that the threshold for gaining an indictment is much easier than gaining a conviction.
CNN saying 34 counts. If true, that's way more than just Stormy.
It is bigger than Trump. They are going to do it to others.No the difference is I know what they are doing I’m just intelligent enough to know that trump ain’t the one to get us through it
Headed to using the courts and the DOJ to destory political enemies. Others will be next. Straight out the commie playbookThe 34 counts comes from the supposed 34 payments to Stormy. Quite a reach. Also, the election commission said that the payment was legal, and Stormy herself is on record saying the affair never even happened.
So what are we doing here?
Headed to using the courts and the DOJ to destory political enemies. Others will be next. Straight out the commie playbook
This is the beginning. We are headed towards one party rule, the big state govt.
💯It's also important to point out that the threshold for gaining an indictment is much easier than gaining a conviction.
Should have been the 3rd President (current or former) facing criminal charges, but Gerry Ford's pardon of Nixon took care of that.This isn’t making the point you think it is